Re: Global (non _KERNEL) place for sockaddr_union?

2004-09-19 Thread Brooks Davis
On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 05:39:38AM +0200, Max Laier wrote: > On Monday 20 September 2004 04:28, Brooks Davis wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 02:50:40AM +0200, Max Laier wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/71836 is the symptom. Now > > > I am looking for a

Re: Global (non _KERNEL) place for sockaddr_union?

2004-09-19 Thread Max Laier
On Monday 20 September 2004 04:28, Brooks Davis wrote: > On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 02:50:40AM +0200, Max Laier wrote: > > Hi, > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/71836 is the symptom. Now > > I am looking for a clean solution to it. What is needed is an include > > file that defin

Re: Global (non _KERNEL) place for sockaddr_union?

2004-09-19 Thread Brooks Davis
On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 02:50:40AM +0200, Max Laier wrote: > Hi, > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/71836 is the symptom. Now I am > looking for a clean solution to it. What is needed is an include file that > defines union sockaddr_union in a way that is useable from kernel and

Global (non _KERNEL) place for sockaddr_union?

2004-09-19 Thread Max Laier
Hi, http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/71836 is the symptom. Now I am looking for a clean solution to it. What is needed is an include file that defines union sockaddr_union in a way that is useable from kernel and userland. Historically it seems that this union first apeared in co

[no subject]

2004-09-19 Thread Jose M Rodriguez
Can someone take a look on PR bin/67550? The protocol correctness maybe not important, but the tftp blocksize option speed up our net boots a lot. thanks in advance, -- josemi -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ ___ [E