Re: time

2004-10-11 Thread Eli Dart
In reply to Mike Silbersack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : > > On Mon, 11 Oct 2004, Eli Dart wrote: > > > > >> Is there a way to change the time_wait timeout value in FreeBSD? > > > > sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.msl= > > > > The default is 3 (30 seconds). > > > > --eli > > That may have othe

Re: IP options broken for raw sockets on cred downgrade (was: Re: why required root privileges to set multicast options now?)

2004-10-11 Thread Christian S.J. Peron
First off, allow me to apologize for the delay, I have been away for Thanks giving weekend. This patch looks like it fixes most of the problems. I should have thought of this when I committed the credential checks, sorry about that! I am testing this patch right now, and I will report any success

Re: time

2004-10-11 Thread Mike Silbersack
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004, Eli Dart wrote: In reply to Omer Faruk Sen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : According to the very old article stated http://www.totse.com/en/technology/computer_technology/162444.html there is no way to tune time_wait timeout in FreeBSD. But since it is very old article my question is thi

Re: IP options broken for raw sockets on cred downgrade (was: Re: why required root privileges to set multicast options now?)

2004-10-11 Thread Robert Watson
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004, Robert Watson wrote: > > This appears to have been introduced as a result of changes to permit > > root to bind raw sockets in jail. In particular, the likely control > > flow path to get the above errors was to perform setsockopt() on a UDP > > socket, which probaly works i

IP options broken for raw sockets on cred downgrade (was: Re: why required root privileges to set multicast options now?)

2004-10-11 Thread Robert Watson
On Sun, 10 Oct 2004, Robert Watson wrote: > On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > FreeBSD 5.3-BETA7 Sun Oct 10 18:50:14 OMSST 2004 > > > > ospfd (net/quagga from ports) run with credentials of quagga:quagga and > > unable to set multicast options now. > > > > OSPF: can't setsockop

Re: time

2004-10-11 Thread Eli Dart
In reply to Omer Faruk Sen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : > According to the very old article stated > http://www.totse.com/en/technology/computer_technology/162444.html there is > no way to tune time_wait timeout in FreeBSD. But since it is very old > article my question is this: > > Is there a way t

Re: new ng_device

2004-10-11 Thread Julian Elischer
Gleb Smirnoff wrote: Same problem. The attachments. One day you are going to remember to attach the attachments.. then we WILL be surprised :-) On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 02:30:28PM +0400, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: T> Here is a major rewrite of ng_device. The main T> differencies with current one are: T>

Re: new ng_device

2004-10-11 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
Same problem. The attachments. On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 02:30:28PM +0400, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: T> Here is a major rewrite of ng_device. The main T> differencies with current one are: T> T> - one dev per node T> - locking T> - read queue implemented using struct ifqueue, thus T> reducing number

Current problem reports assigned to you

2004-10-11 Thread FreeBSD bugmaster
Current FreeBSD problem reports Critical problems Serious problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description --- o [2002/07/26] kern/41007 net overfull traffic on third and fourth adap o [2002/10/21] kern

time

2004-10-11 Thread Omer Faruk Sen
According to the very old article stated http://www.totse.com/en/technology/computer_technology/162444.html there is no way to tune time_wait timeout in FreeBSD. But since it is very old article my question is this: Is there a way to change the time_wait timeout value in FreeBSD? ---

new ng_device

2004-10-11 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
Here is a major rewrite of ng_device. The main differencies with current one are: - one dev per node - locking - read queue implemented using struct ifqueue, thus reducing number of reads/writes to temporary buffers. A more detailed list of differencies is attached. A test program also attache