Re: using natd to load balance port 80 to multiple servers

2004-10-26 Thread .
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ] > Stephane Raimbault wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > I'm currently using a freebsd box running natd to forward port 80 to > > several (5) web servers on private IP's. > > > > I have discovered that natd doesn't handle many requests/second all that >

George White is out of the office.

2004-10-26 Thread GEWhite
I will be out of the office starting 10/26/2004 and will not return until 11/01/2004. I will respond to your message when I return. If it is urgent please contact Heinz Ambach @ X4212 or Christine lovett @ X4409. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http

Re: PPTP/PPPoE mpd/poptop performance

2004-10-26 Thread Pawel Malachowski
On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 07:29:25PM +0300, Petri Helenius wrote: > Although I'm not expert on mpd, I couldn't resist mentioning that not > all MHz are created equal and you probably achieve more performance > difference by carefully choosing a well performing NIC than the absolute > MHz on the b

Re: PPTP/PPPoE mpd/poptop performance

2004-10-26 Thread Petri Helenius
Pawel Malachowski wrote: Hello, I would like to ask people using mpd about performance on particular hardware setups. I am interested in the numbers of sessions (probably PPTP with weak encryption) and total bandwith, that can be achieved with, e.g.: . 300MHz CPU, . 1GHz CPU, . 2GHz CPU. Althoug

Re: PPTP/PPPoE mpd/poptop performance

2004-10-26 Thread Iasen Kostov
Pawel Malachowski wrote: Hello, I would like to ask people using mpd about performance on particular hardware setups. I am interested in the numbers of sessions (probably PPTP with weak encryption) and total bandwith, that can be achieved with, e.g.: . 300MHz CPU, . 1GHz CPU, . 2GHz CPU. Won't PPPo

PPTP/PPPoE mpd/poptop performance

2004-10-26 Thread Pawel Malachowski
Hello, I would like to ask people using mpd about performance on particular hardware setups. I am interested in the numbers of sessions (probably PPTP with weak encryption) and total bandwith, that can be achieved with, e.g.: . 300MHz CPU, . 1GHz CPU, . 2GHz CPU. Won't PPPoE behave better than PPT

Re: SCTP in KAME / Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing itwithsomething simpler

2004-10-26 Thread Peter Lei
SUZUKI Shinsuke wrote: On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 19:58:32 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED](Peter Lei) said: While the SCTP API hasn't gone through last call, it's fairly stable and we have both "converted" many applications from TCP to SCTP using the sockets API, as well as had portability between the KAME SCTP

Re: SCTP in KAME / Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing itwithsomething simpler

2004-10-26 Thread Randall Stewart
SUZUKI Shinsuke wrote: On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 19:58:32 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED](Peter Lei) said: While the SCTP API hasn't gone through last call, it's fairly stable and we have both "converted" many applications from TCP to SCTP using the sockets API, as well as had portability between the KAME SCTP