I seem to have a little concern in one specific early-sanity check in the
ip_fastforward() function of the latest 5.3 code base:
/*
* Is first mbuf large enough for ip header and is header present?
*/
if (m->m_len < sizeof (struct ip) &&
(m = m_pullup(m
James wrote:
>
> I seem to have a little concern in one specific early-sanity check in the
> ip_fastforward() function of the latest 5.3 code base:
>
> /*
> * Is first mbuf large enough for ip header and is header present?
> */
> if (m->m_len < sizeof (struct ip)
System: FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE, cvsup'ed today.
I have bge0 interface and vlan0 configured on it:
-
bge0: flags=8943 mtu 1500
options=1a
vlan0: flags=28943 mtu 1500
vlan: 100 parent interface: bge0
I configure bridge between vlan0 and another physical interface (bge1),
bu
Good Morning!
I have a simple tunnel established between two FreeBSD machines. The
tunnel is encrypted using IPSEC and Racoon. Prior to 5.3-*, I have never
experienced any issues with it.
Using the same configuration in 5.3-*, the tunnel is still established and
simple traffic can be sent across
