On 11 Feb, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> "Li, Qing" wrote:
>>
>> http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/464113
>>
>> http://www.linuxsecurity.com/content/view/104980/98/
>>
>> Ran the packet tests against FreeBSD 5.3 and 6-CURRENT and both
>> respond to the SYN+FIN packets wit
I recently noticed that libfetch often splits HTTP GET requests across
multiple packets as a result of calling writev() for each line of the
header. A simple request ends up on the wire as:
13:19:42.647461 216.69.71.45.1390 > 216.69.64.149.80: S 1287054177:1287054177(0) win
57344 (DF)
0x000
CHOI Junho wrote:
Again, I know what is tux and why there is no such experiment on
FreeBSD.
As I mentionned earlier.
This is not totally true.
An in-kernel httpd was implemented using the netgraph ksocket node to
open a socket in the kernel.
The httpd was I believe implemented as a netgraph modul
"Li, Qing" wrote:
>
> http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/464113
>
> http://www.linuxsecurity.com/content/view/104980/98/
>
> Ran the packet tests against FreeBSD 5.3 and 6-CURRENT and both
> respond to the SYN+FIN packets with SYN+ACK.
This is expected behaviour beca
http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/464113
http://www.linuxsecurity.com/content/view/104980/98/
Ran the packet tests against FreeBSD 5.3 and 6-CURRENT and both
respond to the SYN+FIN packets with SYN+ACK.
Should I file a PR if there isn't one already ?
Hello,
ifconfig fxp0 inet 10.0.0.1/24
ifconfig fxp0 inet add 10.0.1.1/24
both
arp -s 10.0.0.2 1:1:1:1:1:1 pub
arp -s 10.0.1.2 1:1:1:1:1:1 pub
work.
however
arp -s 10.0.0.2 auto pub
works, but
arp -s 10.0.1.2 auto pub
fails with no interface found for 10.0.1.2.
Tested with FreeBSD 4.10-STABL
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 06:20:21PM +0900, CHOI Junho wrote:
>
> Anyone knows about kernel-mode httpd/ftpd for FreeBSD? (just like tux
> of linuxI searched several times but failed.
>
Hiten Pandya played with that a while ago, the outcome is here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~hmp/code/fritz.tgz
From: Gleb Smirnoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: kernel mode httpd/ftpd for FreeBSD?
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 13:43:52 +0300
> Junho,
>
> On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 10:42:27PM +0900, CHOI Junho wrote:
> C> I understand what you mean. If so, why serious network server like nfs
> C> is still in ke
On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 11:03:31AM -0600, Guy Helmer wrote:
G> I'm wondering if bumping the recvspace should help, if changing the
G> ngsocket hook to queue incoming data should help, if it would be best to
G> replace ngsocket with a memory-mapped interface, or if anyone has any
G> other ideas t
Junho,
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 10:42:27PM +0900, CHOI Junho wrote:
C> I understand what you mean. If so, why serious network server like nfs
C> is still in kernel?
Because it is filesystem. Do you want kernel httpd or fast httpd for
static content? In case of the latter use nginx from ports, in
10 matches
Mail list logo
