On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 12:24:58AM +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
...
(luigi)
> +> this said, if the lock requests are blocking, you basically end
> +> up with the polling loops always contending for the locks, with only one
> +> doing actual work and the other one always busy-waiting.
...
(paw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all!
I was happy to configure ng_one2many on my fbsd box, but when I tried to
collect statistics about the many* links of such a node, I've got an
EINVAL. I've looked for it iun the sources, and i found that there may be
a typo, where queries only
-Original Message-
From: Luigi Rizzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 02:59:42 -0800
Subject: Polling objectives (was Re: Giant-free polling [PATCH])
>
> On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 12:24:58AM +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
>
> (lu
hi-
In section 2.5 of the Stevens book it says "we wil see how to effect
this [window scale] option with SO_RCVBUF socket option (Section 7.5)".
But, when I get to Section 7.5 it doesn't say anything about it that I
can find. I searched the whole book, and then googled and then grep'd
the heade
hi!
i would like to develop a gui app, based on gtk+, to monitor all socket
states like tcpview
(http://www.sysinternals.com/ntw2k/source/tcpview.shtml) on ms window.
my kernel experience is small, so my template is sockstat.
my question is: which variable in the xsocket or socket structure, is t
On Fri, 4 Mar 2005, 08:47-0500, lbland wrote:
> hi-
>
> In section 2.5 of the Stevens book it says "we wil see how to effect this
> [window scale] option with SO_RCVBUF socket option (Section 7.5)".
>
> But, when I get to Section 7.5 it doesn't say anything about it that I can
> find. I searched t
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 04:32:43PM +0300, dima wrote:
...
> PS: my question about locking in ether_poll_register() is still actual. I
> think pr[] should be protected by sx while adding a new handler.
ether_poll_register() was called by *foo_intr() so in 4.x it was protected
by splimp() or Giant.
Hi all,
I am wondering if any one knows about a generic parser which takes a
packet (mbuf) of a certain protocol (e.g RSVP ) as input and generates
some data structre representing the packet ?
I've been searching for a while and found that ethereal and tcpdump
for example use specific data struct
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 11:07:34AM -0500, Aziz KEZZOU wrote:
> Hi all,
> I am wondering if any one knows about a generic parser which takes a
> packet (mbuf) of a certain protocol (e.g RSVP ) as input and generates
> some data structre representing the packet ?
>
> I've been searching for a whil
i'm not an expert, but you can attach to bpf (berkeley packet filter)
greets
Andreas Bachmann
> Hi all,
> I am wondering if any one knows about a generic parser which takes a
> packet (mbuf) of a certain protocol (e.g RSVP ) as input and generates
> some data structre representing the packet ?
Hi,
please, avoid top-posting :-).
> i'm not an expert, but you can attach to bpf (berkeley packet filter)
With a correct filter, bpf(4) will help him to get only RSVP packets.
But Aziz is more likely looking for accessing RSVP header fields
individually, a task bpf(4) can't help for. A manuall
At Fri, 4 Mar 2005 11:07:34 -0500,
Aziz KEZZOU wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> I am wondering if any one knows about a generic parser which takes a
> packet (mbuf) of a certain protocol (e.g RSVP ) as input and generates
> some data structre representing the packet ?
>
> I've been searching for a while and
Hi all,
Hope someone can help me with this question:
"What does DNS do when the same hostname is reported from multiple
systems with different IP addresses? "
Thx...Peter
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/
On Mar 4, 2005, at 2:02 PM, Sheh, Peter wrote:
[ ...crossposting trimmed... ]
Hope someone can help me with this question:
"What does DNS do when the same hostname is reported from multiple
systems with different IP addresses? "
The DNS returns the same hostname for each of the IPs which have
> > my question is: which variable in the xsocket or socket structure, is the
> > unique id of a socket?
>
> xso_so
hmmm... i think, it's not a number, but a socket structure.
is this effectively the unique id?
greets
Andreas Bachmann
___
freebsd-net@
Aziz KEZZOU wrote:
Hi all,
I am wondering if any one knows about a generic parser which takes a
packet (mbuf) of a certain protocol (e.g RSVP ) as input and generates
some data structre representing the packet ?
you might look at DPF
(a packet filter/classifier)..
it has an interesting filter
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 11:07:34AM -0500, Aziz KEZZOU wrote:
> Hi all,
> I am wondering if any one knows about a generic parser which takes a
> packet (mbuf) of a certain protocol (e.g RSVP ) as input and generates
> some data structre representing the packet ?
>
> I've been searching for a while
Here is an odd situation.
If I start quagga ospfd after creating gre, tun, or gif devices, ospfd
recognises them as point-to-point interfaces and everything works.
However, if I start quagga and then create interfaces afterwards, the
interfaces are not recognised as point-to-point interfaces and
Howdy,
Sorry to bring what seems like a simple issue up here. I had been blaming
slow afp filesharing between my OS-X (10.3.8 and previous) and FreeBSD 4.x
boxes on netatalk's afp implementation for some time. Not too long ago I
got frustrated with this and tried smb and then ftp. On a simple
On Friday 04 March 2005 14:34, Charles Sprickman wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> Sorry to bring what seems like a simple issue up here. I had been blaming
> slow afp filesharing between my OS-X (10.3.8 and previous) and FreeBSD 4.x
> boxes on netatalk's afp implementation for some time. Not too long ago I
>
On Fri, 4 Mar 2005, Darcy Buskermolen wrote:
On Friday 04 March 2005 14:34, Charles Sprickman wrote:
Howdy,
Sorry to bring what seems like a simple issue up here. I had been blaming
slow afp filesharing between my OS-X (10.3.8 and previous) and FreeBSD 4.x
boxes on netatalk's afp implementation fo
On Mar 4, 2005, at 5:43 PM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
Yep, I wouldn't have come here without checking all the basics. I
should also add that given three machines in my standard config I get
the following results which will also help rule out
cabling/speed/duplex issues:
os-x <-> obsd - good
os-x
"Ang utong ko ay sasabog sa sarap!" exclaimed Charles Sprickman
while reading this message on Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 18:43
and then responded with:
> On Fri, 4 Mar 2005, Darcy Buskermolen wrote:
> >On Friday 04 March 2005 14:34, Charles Sprickman wrote:
> >>Howdy,
> >>Sorry to bring what seems l
23 matches
Mail list logo
