Plan to remove GIANT dependence in ixgb driver

2005-03-29 Thread Paul Willmann
Hi all, I'm new to the list, but before I go ahead and modify the ixgb (intel 10 Gb NIC) driver to have its own mutex, I want to just send out an announcement to avoid any duplication of effort by anyone else who might be doing the same. The drivers in CURRENT and STABLE both require giant.

Racoon(8) Deleting SPD Entries

2005-03-29 Thread emilio mastriani
Hi, I have a similar problem. I’m using native kernel 2.6.9-1.667 in fedora core3 and ipsec-tools -0.3.3-5.6 My peer (84.222.18.181) is a zyxel series 600 and I’m natted behind a same router. The network is: Ipsec-sever (fc3)zyxel/NAT internet

re0: discard oversize frame

2005-03-29 Thread Markus Trippelsdorf
I sometimes get the following error message using a RealTek 8169S Single-chip Gigabit Ethernet card: re0: discard oversize frame (ether type 800 flags 3 len 1514 max 1506) This happens at seemingly random times. root ~ # ifconfig re0 re0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu

Re: Plan to remove GIANT dependence in ixgb driver

2005-03-29 Thread Christian Brueffer
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 02:49:04AM -0600, Paul Willmann wrote: Hi all, I'm new to the list, but before I go ahead and modify the ixgb (intel 10 Gb NIC) driver to have its own mutex, I want to just send out an announcement to avoid any duplication of effort by anyone else who might be

Re: Plan to remove GIANT dependence in ixgb driver

2005-03-29 Thread Maxime Henrion
Christian Brueffer wrote: On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 02:49:04AM -0600, Paul Willmann wrote: Hi all, I'm new to the list, but before I go ahead and modify the ixgb (intel 10 Gb NIC) driver to have its own mutex, I want to just send out an announcement to avoid any duplication of effort

Re: Rigorous specification for TCP, UDP, and Sockets

2005-03-29 Thread Peter Sewell
Are you plannning to share the tools as well? That's what I'd be most interested in seeing, basically the ability to turn your conformance tests into regression tests. It's unclear at the moment - we'd certainly like to make that regression testing more routine, but the current tools are

Re: HOWTO connect MCI using Netgraph + Frame Relay with Digi SYNC/570i

2005-03-29 Thread Julian Elischer
John Mok wrote: Dear Julian, I have re-compiled the kernel with NETGRAPH_ETHER and NETGRAPH_IFACE. I failed to create the lmi node :- why do you want ng_ether? (it's not a problem but it's nothing to do with frame relay.) let's see you full (new) script again.. #ngctl mkpeer sync_ar0: