NO, I didn't encounter a lot if input errors on 4.11.
But I met a lot if input errors on 5.4. And I don't know why?
Is this for so many CSWs( systat -vmstat 1) or any other reason?
BTW, New patch loops in em_intr() like linux' NAPI. If we apply new
patch, polling is necessary yet?
David.Mao
-
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 10:41:28AM +0800, Mao Shou Yan wrote:
M> Can we patch it against 4.11?
M> If not, can we patch the em_intr() to 4.11?
M> Is this patch useful to 4.11?
I don't think so. Do you encounter a lot if input errors on 4.11?
--
Totus tuus, Glebius.
GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE
___
- Original Message -
From: "Marcin Jessa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 9:22 PM
Subject: Re: PPPoE and Radius on 6.0RC1
It does. Everything is working now.
good to hear that :->
Any idea how t
Can we patch it against 4.11?
If not, can we patch the em_intr() to 4.11?
Is this patch useful to 4.11?
Thanks!
David.Mao
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gleb Smirnoff
Sent: 2005年10月20日 22:02
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: em(4) patch for
Hi guys!
I've done another test on the IPSec + gif issue.
Here at my home network I'm running a RELENG_6 box and I've also just
setup a 2nd test server (RELEASE_5_4).
Both are connected by a direct 100 MBit/s LAN connection.
Set up IPSec rules for both machines, created a gif tunnel between bot
Yvan,
>>2) a gif tunnel
>
> No, and that's the main difference for now: I *never* used Gif
> interfaces.
And that's the point. When not using a gif interface to pass traffic
through the IPSec tunnel, I don't see any trouble at all and everything
works fine. As soon as a gif interface is invo
Çäðàâñòâóéòå
Before corrections productivity did not test,
but under loading the link is down.
After has added "media" and "mediaopt" in rc.conf
for some days the link has not fallen never,
but whether there were loadings these days I know.
After a patch, copied approximately 23 Gb data
in four st
On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 10:49:13 +0800
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Marcin Jessa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, October 21, 2005 8:55 PM
> Subject: Re: PPPoE and R
Current FreeBSD problem reports
Critical problems
Serious problems
Non-critical problems
S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description
---
o [2003/07/11] kern/54383 net [nfs] [patch] NFS root configurations w
kamal kc wrote:
- final thing does this makes any difference
(calling the htons() twice):
ip->ip_id=htons(ip->ip_id);
ip->ip_id=htons(ip->ip_id);
on little endian machines: yes. on big endian machines: no. So don't
do it. :)
freebsd has several fields of the ip heade
Sorry for the delay, you took me out of the To: listing, so the message
just went into my lists box, which I didn't get to until today.
On Fri, 14 Oct 2005, Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
Assuming that port reuse is the problem, there is no quick fix for
this, just resetting connections when a SYN
On Sun, 9 Oct 2005, Jan Mikael Melen wrote:
Hi,
I have the D-Link DWL-G520 which has the atheros 5212 chip. When rebooting the
FreeBSD 6.0-BETA5 after the final sync kernel panics. If the if_ath module has
not been loaded in to the memory all works fine. Does anyone have any good
idea how to g
On 2005-10-23 22:27, kamal kc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> one thing i would like to ask?
>
> does it make any difference if i free the mbuf 'm' passed to
> if_output() and pass my own mbuf to if_output.
>
> is the original mbuf referenced by any other pointers or global
> variables ??
If you are
13 matches
Mail list logo
