Re: Changing time causes ipv6 panics

2006-01-18 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
> On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 19:44:38 -0500, > Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > I ran ntpdate on an amd64 system with ipv6 enabled and a skewed clock > (ntpdate stepped it back by about an hour), and immediately got a > use-after-free panic in ifaddr. When I rebooted with memguard enab

RE: em driver + VLAN's

2006-01-18 Thread Dave Raven
Thanks for the reply - I went down to the office to do exactly what you are suggesting and it worked fine - removed "em_enable_vlans(adapter);" Thanks all Dave -Original Message- From: Doug Ambrisko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 18 January 2006 10:04 PM To: Dave Raven Cc: 'Gleb Smirnof

Re: em driver + VLAN's

2006-01-18 Thread Kevin Day
On Jan 18, 2006, at 9:05 AM, Dave Raven wrote: FreeBSD 4.9 - char em_driver_version[] = "1.7.16"; I've tried multiple bridge configurations - from bridging just em0,em1 to bridging two vlan's attached to each card. Unfortunately I don't have access to the box at the moment - if its still

Re: em driver + VLAN's

2006-01-18 Thread Doug Ambrisko
Sten Spans writes: | On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Doug Ambrisko wrote: | > Dave Raven writes: | > | FreeBSD 4.9 - char em_driver_version[] = "1.7.16"; | > | | > | I've tried multiple bridge configurations - from bridging just em0,em1 to | > | bridging two vlan's attached to each card. Unfortunately I don't

Re: em driver + VLAN's

2006-01-18 Thread Sten Spans
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Doug Ambrisko wrote: Dave Raven writes: | FreeBSD 4.9 - char em_driver_version[] = "1.7.16"; | | I've tried multiple bridge configurations - from bridging just em0,em1 to | bridging two vlan's attached to each card. Unfortunately I don't have access | to the box at the momen

Re: em driver + VLAN's

2006-01-18 Thread Doug Ambrisko
Dave Raven writes: | FreeBSD 4.9 - char em_driver_version[] = "1.7.16"; | | I've tried multiple bridge configurations - from bridging just em0,em1 to | bridging two vlan's attached to each card. Unfortunately I don't have access | to the box at the moment - if its still necessary I will fetch the

Re: MPD and client behind firewall

2006-01-18 Thread Tiago Cruz
On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 18:01 +0300, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > Masquarading GRE protocol, which is used by PPTP as transport, isn't > simple. Not all NATs can do this. If you are going to server a lot > of clients connecting from random places in the world, then you will > face this problem time to tim

RE: em driver + VLAN's

2006-01-18 Thread Dave Raven
FreeBSD 4.9 - char em_driver_version[] = "1.7.16"; I've tried multiple bridge configurations - from bridging just em0,em1 to bridging two vlan's attached to each card. Unfortunately I don't have access to the box at the moment - if its still necessary I will fetch the information tomorrow (ifconfi

Re: MPD and client behind firewall

2006-01-18 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 03:52:00PM -0200, Tiago Cruz wrote: T> I have a FreeBSD 6.0 running MPD server 3.18_3. T> The MPD server works very good when I has _direct_ connected by T> Internet. T> T> My problem is with one _client_ (Win XP) behind NAT from iptables. I T> have to do some in my PF? T>

Re: em driver + VLAN's

2006-01-18 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 03:12:27PM +0200, Dave Raven wrote: D> Hi all, D> I'm having an interesting problem at the moment. I want to bridge D> between two cisco switches on trunk ports. Basically bridging vlans - if I D> bridge my two main interfaces it works fine if they are fxp, but not when

pf: redirect packets from localhost

2006-01-18 Thread Sebastian Schwerdhoefer
Short question: Is it possible to redirect packets from localhost with "rdr"? Regards, Sebastian Schwerdhoefer ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTEC

em driver + VLAN's

2006-01-18 Thread Dave Raven
Hi all, I'm having an interesting problem at the moment. I want to bridge between two cisco switches on trunk ports. Basically bridging vlans - if I bridge my two main interfaces it works fine if they are fxp, but not when I use em cards... Could this be related to the driver, or BSD in so

Re: MPD and client behind firewall

2006-01-18 Thread Tiago Cruz
Hello Sten, very thanks by your reply! On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 11:28 +0100, Sten Daniel Sørsdal wrote: > I believe it to be an IPTables and PF issue. What? Oh my god... So, what can I do in PF-side? My potential VPN users have the client configured in your notebook, and I think that they always w

Re: MPD and client behind firewall

2006-01-18 Thread Sten Daniel Sørsdal
Tiago Cruz wrote: > I have a FreeBSD 6.0 running MPD server 3.18_3. > The MPD server works very good when I has _direct_ connected by > Internet. > > My problem is with one _client_ (Win XP) behind NAT from iptables. I > have to do some in my PF? > > In this case, I've tried do this (in iptables