On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 01:49:40AM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 12:37:46PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 06:41:10PM +0900, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 1 Feb 2006 12:04:21 +0300
> > > > Gleb Smirnoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > >
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 09:59:39PM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 01:49:40AM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 12:37:46PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 06:41:10PM +0900, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, 1 Feb 2006 12:04
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 01:49:40AM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 12:37:46PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 06:41:10PM +0900, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 1 Feb 2006 12:04:21 +0300
> > > > Gleb Smirnoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > >
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 12:37:46PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 06:41:10PM +0900, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
> > > On Wed, 1 Feb 2006 12:04:21 +0300
> > > Gleb Smirnoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> >
> > glebius> If you have compiled the modules as part of buildkernel
>
Brian Candler wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 12:42:36PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
And, If I have't not control about the second gateway? Because my client
have a notebook, and he can try connect at anyplace, anytime :-(
So, I think that is impossible to to... is true?
no,
you
At 02:13 PM 2/1/2006, Sam Leffler wrote:
Dan Swartzendruber wrote:
Poking through ieee80211_ioctl.c in the kernel, I see this:
case IEEE80211_IOC_SCAN_REQ:
if (ic->ic_opmode == IEEE80211_M_HOSTAP)/*
XXX ignore */
break;
er
Synopsis: [net] slowstart_flightsize ignored in 6-STABLE
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-net->andre
Responsible-Changed-By: andre
Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Feb 1 19:32:33 UTC 2006
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Take over.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=92690
__
Old Synopsis: slowstart_flightsize ignored in 6-STABLE
New Synopsis: [net] slowstart_flightsize ignored in 6-STABLE
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Feb 1 19:21:15 UTC 2006
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Over to maintai
Dan Swartzendruber wrote:
Poking through ieee80211_ioctl.c in the kernel, I see this:
case IEEE80211_IOC_SCAN_REQ:
if (ic->ic_opmode == IEEE80211_M_HOSTAP)/* XXX
ignore */
break;
error = ieee80211_setupscan(ic, ic->ic_cha
Synopsis: A serious bug in most network drivers from 5.X to 6.X (regression)
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Feb 1 19:05:14 UTC 2006
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Over to freebsd-net for evaluation.
http://www.freebs
Poking through ieee80211_ioctl.c in the kernel, I see this:
case IEEE80211_IOC_SCAN_REQ:
if (ic->ic_opmode == IEEE80211_M_HOSTAP)/*
XXX ignore */
break;
error = ieee80211_setupscan(ic, ic->ic_chan_avail);
i
I have an atheros PCI card (cisco aironet) operating bridged with
fxp0. All is working fine. The only thing is that if I try to do a
scan with 'ifconfig ath0 scan' (as documented in the manpage), it
hangs. I've let it sit for 1/2 hour and it never prints
anything. Hitting ctrl-C breaks ou
Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
Last week, at the Linux.conf.au in Dunedin, Van Jacobson presented
some slides about work he has been doing rearchitecting the Linux
network stack. He claims to have reduced the CPU usage by 80% and
doubled network throughput (he expects more, but it was limited by
me
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 12:42:36PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> >And, If I have't not control about the second gateway? Because my client
> >have a notebook, and he can try connect at anyplace, anytime :-(
> >
> >So, I think that is impossible to to... is true?
> >
> >
> no,
> you should be abl
Hello,
Sorry for messing with things I should not as I am not a FreeBSD
developer but I think this idea can be implemented without titanic
work (I can be wrong due to lack of information about FreeBSD
developement).
Now routing is performed using lookup of destination address in the
routing table
Hello from all, good morning.
I wrote a little article speaking about VPN in FreeBSD, called "VPN
Solutions integrating Linux, FreeBSD and Windows":
http://www.linuxrapido.org/modules.php?name=Sections&op=viewarticle&artid=95
Well, I can't saw the start from this thread, but I have some things to
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 06:41:10PM +0900, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > On Wed, 1 Feb 2006 12:04:21 +0300
> > Gleb Smirnoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> glebius> If you have compiled the modules as part of buildkernel
> glebius> target, then all options from kernel would apply to all
Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
Last week, at the Linux.conf.au in Dunedin, Van Jacobson presented
some slides about work he has been doing rearchitecting the Linux
network stack. He claims to have reduced the CPU usage by 80% and
doubled network throughput (he expects more, but it was limited by
mem
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 01:36:19AM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
L> On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 12:04:21PM +0300, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
L> > On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 12:56:58AM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
L> > L> just noticed that if_bridge.ko fails to load if your kernel
L> > L> is not compiled with INET6 - t
Hi,
> On Wed, 1 Feb 2006 12:04:21 +0300
> Gleb Smirnoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
glebius> If you have compiled the modules as part of buildkernel
glebius> target, then all options from kernel would apply to all
glebius> modules, thus the bridge_ip6_checkbasic() function won't
glebius> be
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 12:04:21PM +0300, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 12:56:58AM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> L> just noticed that if_bridge.ko fails to load if your kernel
> L> is not compiled with INET6 - the failure is actually only
> L> on symbols related to stats gathering in
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 12:56:58AM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
L> just noticed that if_bridge.ko fails to load if your kernel
L> is not compiled with INET6 - the failure is actually only
L> on symbols related to stats gathering in
L> bridge_ip6_checkbasic()
L>
L> I wonder if it might be worthwhile j
just noticed that if_bridge.ko fails to load if your kernel
is not compiled with INET6 - the failure is actually only
on symbols related to stats gathering in
bridge_ip6_checkbasic()
I wonder if it might be worthwhile just ignoring
those stats when compiling if_bridge as a module,
so it can be loa
23 matches
Mail list logo
