This has now been applied to -CURRENT after testing by a 3rd party.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Current FreeBSD problem reports
Critical problems
Serious problems
S Tracker Resp. Description
a kern/38554 netchanging interface ipaddress doesn't seem to work
s kern/39937 netipstealth
It is possible to record logs of all connections nated with the PF?
Already tried to use "nat log on...", without success.
Thanks.
--
Daniel Dias Gonçalves
DGNET Network Solutions
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.dgnetwork.com.br/
+55 37-99824809
+55 37-32421109
_
>
> It is possible to record logs of all connections nated with the PF?
> Already tried to use "nat log on...", without success.
>
The version of PF used in FreeBSD (OpenBSD rev 3.7 I believe) doesn't have
the log option for either nat pass or rdr pass.
That facility came in later versions of
Konrad Heuer wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> is there an analogon to the Linux sysctl variable "tcp_fin_timeout" in
> FreeBSD to force the system to close still open TCP connections after
> some time?
>
> Any hint would be great.
If I understand correctly, 'tcp_fin_timeout' on Linux sets timeout
Hello all,
I'm in need of some information on how to utilize SIOCADDMULTI. It is
supposed to be demonstrated by the mtest [1] program, but that doesn't
do anything (on an SIOCDELMULTI rn it appears nothing was added:
ENOENT), At least not for the values I tested, 1.80.c2.0.0.1 in
particular. I pr
Hi,
If any of you out there have network interfaces which have broken
ALLMULTI handling (i.e. they can't handle multicast routing), I would
love to hear from you.
Regards,
BMS
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
Jouke Witteveen wrote:
Hello all,
I'm in need of some information on how to utilize SIOCADDMULTI. It is
supposed to be demonstrated by the mtest [1] program, but that doesn't
do anything (on an SIOCDELMULTI rn it appears nothing was added:
ENOENT), At least not for the values I tested, 1.80.c2.0
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 05:05:32PM +0100, Robin Gruyters wrote:
> On 13-Jan-2007 Oleg Bulyzhin wrote:
> >
> >> Could you please test attached patch? It should fix ierrs issue
> >and should not
> >> break link events (would be fine to test it: unplug/plug cable,
> >try to change
> >> media with
Greetings,
Unless disabled with -s flag, rtadvd(8) automatically picks up on-link
prefixes from the routing table and includes them in RA messages. In
doing so, rtadvd does not seem to distinguish preferred prefixes
(preferred lifetime > 0) from distinguished ones (pltime = 0), but
simply adverti
Hello,
I am running a 6.1-RELEASE system, one IP (v4) address
configured, everything is wonderful.
Now, in the past I have added additional IPv4
addresses with this command:
ifconfig fxp0 alias 192.168.0.2 netmask
255.255.255.255
Easy. So now, I need to add a ipv6 address for the
first time,
2006/12/14, Oleg Bulyzhin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 12:55:51AM +, MQ wrote:
> 2006/12/12, Oleg Bulyzhin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 11:54:01AM +0300, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> >> Forwarding to net@ list and to Oleg, who has made polling
> >> support
> On Mon, 05 Feb 2007 16:56:49 -0800,
> "Eugene M. Kim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Note that the two automatically configured addresses on em0 are still
> preferred, while the prefix 2001:470:1f01:3222::/64 is deprecated on the
> router.
> I believe rtadvd(8) should advertise deprecated
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Randall Stewart wrote:
Well.. no I believe someone (was in Lin) mentioned that
you can get a live-lock if you allow a reduction.. and
thus the mbuf clusters were NOT allowed to be reduced..
I messed around with this a bit when changing the limit on
net.inet.tcp.maxtcptw.
14 matches
Mail list logo
