On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 10:27:07AM -0500, David DeSimone wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> W Forms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I don't really understand this, since from what I can see all that
> > Pyun YongHyeon's changes do is replacing a constant value o
On Tue, 3 Jul 2007, John E Hein wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote at 21:21 +0900 on Jul 3, 2007:
> Please forward problems, and patches to me, or this list.
How about the NAT-T patches (see ports/ipsec-tools/Makefile)?
Any plans to integrate those?
see
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote at 21:21 +0900 on Jul 3, 2007:
> Please forward problems, and patches to me, or this list.
How about the NAT-T patches (see ports/ipsec-tools/Makefile)?
Any plans to integrate those?
This was just recently discussed on freebsd-net in May and updated for
-current at that
your mail was ZVERY hard to read becosue you mixed you comments in with my mail
without distinguishing them in any way.. I missed two of them on first reading.
Martha Pasikatan wrote:
Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Alexander Motin wrote:
Martha Pasikatan wrote:
I would like to be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
W Forms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I don't really understand this, since from what I can see all that
> Pyun YongHyeon's changes do is replacing a constant value of 6 and 8
> with macros containing the value of 6 and 8.
Here's the patch as I recal
Great work George.. :-D
R
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
My most recent check-in moves FreeBSD HEAD, soon to be 7.0 into the
post Kame era. What was once FAST_IPSEC has been made into IPSEC and
the Kame IPsec code has been removed from the tree. We will continue
to use and update the Kame IPv6
Hi,
My most recent check-in moves FreeBSD HEAD, soon to be 7.0 into the
post Kame era. What was once FAST_IPSEC has been made into IPSEC and
the Kame IPsec code has been removed from the tree. We will continue
to use and update the Kame IPv6 code but of course there will be no
more drops of code
Bjoern, good day.
Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 09:40:03AM +, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> This was fixed already:
> http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200707030720.l637KLB9095895
>
> Just update and try again;)
Yep, I had already seen the commit message. Updated slightly before
2007/07/03 07:20:20 UTC,
sazzadur rahman wrote:
Hi,
I was just wondering whether SCTP implementation in FreeBSD supports
"dynamic
address reconfiguration" (
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-tsvwg-addip-sctp-22.txt) ? I
would appriciate any help in this regard.
Thanks in advance,
Sazzad.
_
David Christensen wrote:
Sorry for the top post, please try following patch:
http://people.freebsd.org/~sephe/if_bce.c.diff
This is probably the cause; I noticed it when bce(4) was
ported to DragonFly.
Thanks Sephe, I think you're on to something. I have some
debug code in the driver to si
The following reply was made to PR kern/112710; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: W Forms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Pyun YongHyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: kern/112710: [re] if_re driver detects incorrect b243a405a405 MAC
address on SMC9452TX-1 pci gigabit cards
Date:
On Tue, 3 Jul 2007, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
Hi,
I had tried to build my kernel on the -CURRENT after your FAST_IPSEC
commits and I failed. The problem is that I am running without
INET6, so inet6_tcp_input misses three functions on the kernel
linking stage.
I believe that the following patch
George, good day.
I had tried to build my kernel on the -CURRENT after your FAST_IPSEC
commits and I failed. The problem is that I am running without
INET6, so inet6_tcp_input misses three functions on the kernel
linking stage.
I believe that the following patch will cure the situation: we don't
13 matches
Mail list logo
