Max Laier wrote:
On Friday 10 August 2007, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 wrote:
At Fri, 10 Aug 2007 11:52:09 +0800,
blue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When looking into kame-20070801-freebsd54-snap, the function,
_dns_getaddrinfo(), defined in getaddrinfo.c, will check if the
device gets any IPv4
On Friday 10 August 2007, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 wrote:
> At Fri, 10 Aug 2007 11:52:09 +0800,
>
> blue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > When looking into kame-20070801-freebsd54-snap, the function,
> > _dns_getaddrinfo(), defined in getaddrinfo.c, will check if the
> > device gets any IPv4/global IPv6
At Fri, 10 Aug 2007 11:52:09 +0800,
blue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When looking into kame-20070801-freebsd54-snap, the function,
> _dns_getaddrinfo(), defined in getaddrinfo.c, will check if the device
> gets any IPv4/global IPv6 address before sending out any A/ query by
> calling addrc
Dear all:
When looking into kame-20070801-freebsd54-snap, the function,
_dns_getaddrinfo(), defined in getaddrinfo.c, will check if the device
gets any IPv4/global IPv6 address before sending out any A/ query by
calling addrconfig() if the user does not specify the family type
(AF_UNSPEC)
On Aug 9, 2007, at 7:40 PMAug 9, 2007, David Gilbert wrote:
The following reply was made to PR kern/115360; it has been noted
by GNATS.
From: David Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Andrew Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: kern/115360: IPv6 a
The following reply was made to PR kern/115360; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: David Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Andrew Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: kern/115360: IPv6 address and if_bridge don't play well together.
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2
Synopsis: IPv6 address and if_bridge don't play well together.
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: remko
Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Aug 9 19:21:31 UTC 2007
Responsible-Changed-Why:
This sounds more suitable for the networking team, reassign.
http://w
Eric:
Maybe. However, I just got a message from a Microsoft employee
named Samir Jain that indicates SSTP may not be a viable standard
-- or, in fact, a standard at all. He says that Microsoft is
implementing it only on Vista, not XP... even though most hardware
out there which runs XP cannot
Brett Glass <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi,
> It seems as if it would be easy to cobble together an SSTP client and
> server using code already available on FreeBSD. (It'd require a daemon
> for userland PPP and probably an SSL Netgraph node -- which,
> surprisingly, doesn't seem to exist already
