Synopsis: [ipv6] [patch] ip6_fw doesn't count base IPv6 header in byte
statistics
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: mlaier
State-Changed-When: Fri Aug 10 20:48:26 UTC 2007
State-Changed-Why:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=115293
_
On Friday 10 August 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Synopsis: [ipv6] [patch] ip6_fw doesn't count base IPv6 header in byte
> statistics
>
> State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
> State-Changed-By: mlaier
> State-Changed-When: Fri Aug 10 20:48:26 UTC 2007
> State-Changed-Why:
Sorry. This was meant
On Fri, 10 Aug 2007, blue wrote:
> JINMEI Tatuya / wrote:
>
> >At Fri, 10 Aug 2007 13:45:46 +0800,
> >blue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>Although DNS resolver may lead to some delay or misbehavior of the upper
> >>application, I think that would be caller's resposibi
I have a bridging firewall in place using FreeBSD 6.1, if_bridge, and pf.
I'd like to be able to block IP addresses by default on the bridge, but
selectively allow people through. This is easily accomplished with a table,
however it would be nice if I could also alert people as to why they aren't
On Saturday 11 August 2007, Tieres White wrote:
> I have a bridging firewall in place using FreeBSD 6.1, if_bridge, and
> pf. I'd like to be able to block IP addresses by default on the bridge,
> but selectively allow people through. This is easily accomplished with
> a table, however it would be
On Aug 10, 2007, at 10:40 AMAug 10, 2007, David Gilbert wrote:
"Eric" == Eric F Crist writes:
Eric> FWIW, I've been using if_bridge for a short while (month or two)
Eric> and I've got all my IPs assigned to the interfaces themselves,
Eric> and not bridge0. I'm not using em or dc cards, but e
> "Eric" == Eric F Crist writes:
Eric> FWIW, I've been using if_bridge for a short while (month or two)
Eric> and I've got all my IPs assigned to the interfaces themselves,
Eric> and not bridge0. I'm not using em or dc cards, but everything
Eric> works great. I'm using the fxp driver on bot
At Fri, 10 Aug 2007 13:45:46 +0800,
blue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Although DNS resolver may lead to some delay or misbehavior of the upper
> application, I think that would be caller's resposibility to decide
> which result it would like to use. I am not so sure about the check in
> KAME im
JINMEI Tatuya / wrote:
At Fri, 10 Aug 2007 13:45:46 +0800,
blue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Although DNS resolver may lead to some delay or misbehavior of the upper
application, I think that would be caller's resposibility to decide
which result it would like to use. I am not so sure a
Old Synopsis: ip6_fw doesn't count base IPv6 header in byte statistics
New Synopsis: [ipv6] [patch] ip6_fw doesn't count base IPv6 header in byte
statistics
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Aug 10 20:41:48 UTC 200
10 matches
Mail list logo