On Dec 14, 2007 1:24 AM, Niki Denev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a reason that when adding member ports to a bridge stp is not
> enabled by default on them?
> Wouldn't it be more intuitive to be enabled by default these days?
There are several reasons not to enable STP on a bridge
Hi All,
Just a check whether WOL is supported in the Broadcom drivers. Sorry in case
this does not interest you.
I was just checking whether we have WOL support in Broadcom drivers. I had a
look at the current source and could not find the support.
Is this in the list of todo's??
Can this featu
Julian Elischer wrote:
> Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> >On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 10:33:25AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> >J> Maxime Henrion wrote:
> >J> > Replying to myself on this one, sorry about that.
> >J> > I said in my previous mail that I didn't know yet what process was
> >J> > holding the loc
John E Hein wrote:
Raffaele De Lorenzo wrote at 14:39 +0100 on Dec 10, 2007:
> You can see in the port-tree my project "csocks" and
> http://csocks.altervista.org.
Thanks for lettings us know about your project. Here are
just a few comments.
Why don't you provide the source code in the
One more comment on my last email... The patch that I included is not
meant as a real fix - it is just a bandaid. The real problem appears to
be that a very large number of vnodes (all of them?) are getting synced
(i.e. calling ffs_syncvnode()) every time. This should normally only
happen for di
> While trying to diagnose a packet loss problem in a RELENG_6 snapshot
> dated
> November 8, 2007 it looks like I've stumbled across a broken driver or
> kernel routine which stops interrupt processing long enough to severly
> degrade network performance every 30.99 seconds.
I noticed this a
Current FreeBSD problem reports
Critical problems
S Tracker Resp. Description
f kern/115360 net[ipv6] IPv6 address and if_bridge don't play well toge
1 problem total.
Serious problems
S Tracker
Krishna Kumar wrote:
Is this in the list of todo's??
Can this feature not be supported due to design issues?
Is somebody trying this out somewhere?
Please do copy me on the reply as I am not subscribed to the list.
Look into freebsd-hackers@ mail archive. In the previous month there
was a discu
On Dec 17, 2007 3:23 AM, Ivo Vachkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Dec 14, 2007 1:24 AM, Niki Denev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is there a reason that when adding member ports to a bridge stp is not
> > enabled by default on them?
> > Wouldn't it be more intuitive to be enabled b
Dear All,
Any one know how to us netgraph to create a pair of pseudo ethernet
interface. The packet
go out from one and in another.
Thanks alot
Zhouyi Zhou
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
Back to back test with no ethernet switch between two em interfaces,
same result. The receiving side has been up > 1 day and exhibits
the problem. These are also two different servers. The small
gettimeofday() syscall tester also shows the same ~30
second pattern of high latency between syscall
On Monday 17 December 2007 14:15:45 zhouyi zhou wrote:
> Dear All,
> Any one know how to us netgraph to create a pair of pseudo
> ethernet interface. The packet go out from one and in another.
tpx32# ngctl mkpeer eiface ether ether
tpx32# ngctl mkpeer eiface ether ether
tpx32# ngctl l
There ar
Maxime Henrion wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 10:33:25AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
J> Maxime Henrion wrote:
J> > Replying to myself on this one, sorry about that.
J> > I said in my previous mail that I didn't know yet what process was
J> > holdin
zhouyi zhou wrote:
Any one know how to us netgraph to create a pair of pseudo ethernet
interface. The packet
go out from one and in another.
man 4 ng_eiface ,
man 4 netgraph ?
--
Alexander Motin
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://li
Thanks. Have a kernel building now. It takes about a day of uptime
after reboot before I'll see the problem.
--
mark
On Dec 17, 2007, at 5:24 AM, David G Lawrence wrote:
While trying to diagnose a packet loss problem in a RELENG_6 snapshot
dated
November 8, 2007 it looks like I've stumbled
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, David G Lawrence wrote:
While trying to diagnose a packet loss problem in a RELENG_6 snapshot
dated
November 8, 2007 it looks like I've stumbled across a broken driver or
kernel routine which stops interrupt processing long enough to severly
degrade network performance every
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, David G Lawrence wrote:
One more comment on my last email... The patch that I included is not
meant as a real fix - it is just a bandaid. The real problem appears to
be that a very large number of vnodes (all of them?) are getting synced
(i.e. calling ffs_syncvnode()) ever
Bruce Evans wrote:
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, David G Lawrence wrote:
One more comment on my last email... The patch that I included is not
meant as a real fix - it is just a bandaid. The real problem appears to
be that a very large number of vnodes (all of them?) are getting synced
(i.e. calling f
18 matches
Mail list logo