Re: bridge and stp defaults

On Dec 14, 2007 1:24 AM, Niki Denev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Is there a reason that when adding member ports to a bridge stp is not > enabled by default on them? > Wouldn't it be more intuitive to be enabled by default these days? There are several reasons not to enable STP on a bridge

WOL suport in Broadcom 5721 (57XX)

Hi All, Just a check whether WOL is supported in the Broadcom drivers. Sorry in case this does not interest you. I was just checking whether we have WOL support in Broadcom drivers. I had a look at the current source and could not find the support. Is this in the list of todo's?? Can this featu

Re: Deadlock in the routing code

Julian Elischer wrote: > Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > >On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 10:33:25AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: > >J> Maxime Henrion wrote: > >J> > Replying to myself on this one, sorry about that. > >J> > I said in my previous mail that I didn't know yet what process was > >J> > holding the loc

Re: Added native socks support to libc in FreeBSD 7

John E Hein wrote: Raffaele De Lorenzo wrote at 14:39 +0100 on Dec 10, 2007: > You can see in the port-tree my project "csocks" and > http://csocks.altervista.org. Thanks for lettings us know about your project. Here are just a few comments. Why don't you provide the source code in the

Re: Packet loss every 30.999 seconds

One more comment on my last email... The patch that I included is not meant as a real fix - it is just a bandaid. The real problem appears to be that a very large number of vnodes (all of them?) are getting synced (i.e. calling ffs_syncvnode()) every time. This should normally only happen for di

Re: Packet loss every 30.999 seconds

> While trying to diagnose a packet loss problem in a RELENG_6 snapshot > dated > November 8, 2007 it looks like I've stumbled across a broken driver or > kernel routine which stops interrupt processing long enough to severly > degrade network performance every 30.99 seconds. I noticed this a

Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org

Current FreeBSD problem reports Critical problems S Tracker Resp. Description f kern/115360 net[ipv6] IPv6 address and if_bridge don't play well toge 1 problem total. Serious problems S Tracker

Re: WOL suport in Broadcom 5721 (57XX)

Krishna Kumar wrote: Is this in the list of todo's?? Can this feature not be supported due to design issues? Is somebody trying this out somewhere? Please do copy me on the reply as I am not subscribed to the list. Look into freebsd-hackers@ mail archive. In the previous month there was a discu

Re: bridge and stp defaults

On Dec 17, 2007 3:23 AM, Ivo Vachkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Dec 14, 2007 1:24 AM, Niki Denev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Is there a reason that when adding member ports to a bridge stp is not > > enabled by default on them? > > Wouldn't it be more intuitive to be enabled b

using netgraph to create a pair of pseudo ethernet interface

Dear All, Any one know how to us netgraph to create a pair of pseudo ethernet interface. The packet go out from one and in another. Thanks alot Zhouyi Zhou ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net

Re: Packet loss every 30.999 seconds

Back to back test with no ethernet switch between two em interfaces, same result. The receiving side has been up > 1 day and exhibits the problem. These are also two different servers. The small gettimeofday() syscall tester also shows the same ~30 second pattern of high latency between syscall

Re: using netgraph to create a pair of pseudo ethernet interface

On Monday 17 December 2007 14:15:45 zhouyi zhou wrote: > Dear All, > Any one know how to us netgraph to create a pair of pseudo > ethernet interface. The packet go out from one and in another. tpx32# ngctl mkpeer eiface ether ether tpx32# ngctl mkpeer eiface ether ether tpx32# ngctl l There ar

Re: Deadlock in the routing code

Maxime Henrion wrote: Julian Elischer wrote: Gleb Smirnoff wrote: On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 10:33:25AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: J> Maxime Henrion wrote: J> > Replying to myself on this one, sorry about that. J> > I said in my previous mail that I didn't know yet what process was J> > holdin

Re: using netgraph to create a pair of pseudo ethernet interface

zhouyi zhou wrote: Any one know how to us netgraph to create a pair of pseudo ethernet interface. The packet go out from one and in another. man 4 ng_eiface , man 4 netgraph ? -- Alexander Motin ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://li

Re: Packet loss every 30.999 seconds

Thanks. Have a kernel building now. It takes about a day of uptime after reboot before I'll see the problem. -- mark On Dec 17, 2007, at 5:24 AM, David G Lawrence wrote: While trying to diagnose a packet loss problem in a RELENG_6 snapshot dated November 8, 2007 it looks like I've stumbled

Re: Packet loss every 30.999 seconds

On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, David G Lawrence wrote: While trying to diagnose a packet loss problem in a RELENG_6 snapshot dated November 8, 2007 it looks like I've stumbled across a broken driver or kernel routine which stops interrupt processing long enough to severly degrade network performance every

Re: Packet loss every 30.999 seconds

On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, David G Lawrence wrote: One more comment on my last email... The patch that I included is not meant as a real fix - it is just a bandaid. The real problem appears to be that a very large number of vnodes (all of them?) are getting synced (i.e. calling ffs_syncvnode()) ever

Re: Packet loss every 30.999 seconds

Bruce Evans wrote: On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, David G Lawrence wrote: One more comment on my last email... The patch that I included is not meant as a real fix - it is just a bandaid. The real problem appears to be that a very large number of vnodes (all of them?) are getting synced (i.e. calling f