Re: Problems with Chelsio driver in CURRENT...

2008-02-13 Thread Kip Macy
When you say a recent kernel/world, I take it you're still running 7.0? -Kip On Feb 12, 2008 11:38 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I have two MP/Multicore Xeon boxes with CX4 based Chelsio cards in them. If I boot 7.0-RC1 the cards can talk to each other. If I build a recent

Re: Problems with Chelsio driver in CURRENT...

2008-02-13 Thread gnn
At Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:52:52 -0800, Kip Macy wrote: Oops sorry ... What is the output of 'sysctl dev.cxgbc.0'? Here ya go, and thanks! Later, George nozomi8# ifconfig cxgb0 cxgb0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 9000

Re: Kernel compile options

2008-02-13 Thread Michael Tuexen
Hi Tom, I want to fix the SCTP code such that you can compile without INET6. I also wanted to figure out if one can change the SCTP code such that SCTP can be build with INET6 and without INET... But it seems that this does not work for FreeBSD without SCTP. Best regards Michael On Feb 13,

Re: Kernel compile options

2008-02-13 Thread Tom Evans
On Wed, 2008-02-13 at 12:55 +0100, Michael Tuexen wrote: Hi Tom, I want to fix the SCTP code such that you can compile without INET6. I also wanted to figure out if one can change the SCTP code such that SCTP can be build with INET6 and without INET... But it seems that this does not

Re: Kernel compile options

2008-02-13 Thread Michael Tuexen
Hi Tom, see my comments in-line. Best regards Michael On Feb 13, 2008, at 1:41 PM, Tom Evans wrote: On Wed, 2008-02-13 at 12:55 +0100, Michael Tuexen wrote: Hi Tom, I want to fix the SCTP code such that you can compile without INET6. I also wanted to figure out if one can change the SCTP

Re: Problems with Chelsio driver in CURRENT...

2008-02-13 Thread Kip Macy
Yup. -CURRENT has a very different driver from 7.0. It performs much better, but I don't want to MFC until it gets more test coverage. -Kip On 2/13/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK, one more data point. The issue is somewhere between RC2 and CURRENT. I just put RC2 on

Re: Newb question

2008-02-13 Thread Nick Rogness
On 2/8/08, Kurt Buff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All, My company is getting a fractional DS3 in the near future, and I've acquired a Sangoma a301 card to handle the interface. We're retaining one of the T1s we currently have, from a different provider, and we're intent on using BGP to manage

Re: Strange resolver behavior

2008-02-13 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
At Tue, 12 Feb 2008 17:31:57 -0800, Xin LI [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It looks like that certain (mis)configuration by the baidu.com DNS administrators has caused this, but I have no clue why our resolver would return NXDOMAIN after it gets a positive response? (Yes, I know that _ is not

Re: ospf cost and route selection (openospfd)

2008-02-13 Thread Eygene Ryabinkin
Josef, good day. Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 11:53:57AM +0100, Josef Pojsl wrote: I did try the patch. Unfortunately, the deamon complains about sending packets over gre interfaces. I cannot see any OSPF traffic on them with tcpdump, and no routes get added. Found another OpenBSD/FreeBSD

Re: Newb question

2008-02-13 Thread Kurt Buff
Nice, concise. Thanks! Kurt On 2/13/08, Nick Rogness [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2/8/08, Kurt Buff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All, My company is getting a fractional DS3 in the near future, and I've acquired a Sangoma a301 card to handle the interface. We're retaining one of the

Re: ospf cost and route selection (openospfd)

2008-02-13 Thread Eygene Ryabinkin
Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 10:37:29PM +0300, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: Attached is the modified patch for the port itself and the modified file 'files/patch-ospfd_packet.c': it is the only changed file from the previous version of my patch. So, if you had already patched the port to 4.2 with previous

[RESOLVED] Re: Strange resolver behavior

2008-02-13 Thread Xin LI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 wrote: [snip] At the beginning I was confused with host(1) and resolver library, they are different problems, sorry for the confusion. I think Hajimu-san's analysis was correct that it was caused by the check in resolver, here

Re: ospf cost and route selection (openospfd)

2008-02-13 Thread Josef Pojsl
Hello Eygene, On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 10:37:29PM +0300, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: Found another OpenBSD/FreeBSD discrepancy: FreeBSD wants to see IP header's length in the native host order, when it sends the packets with sendmsg(). Corrected the patch and tried it on my test setup with Qemu:

Re: Kernel compile options

2008-02-13 Thread Tom Judge
Michael Tuexen wrote: SNIP (also, please don't top post) Why not? I do that a lot... Please read: http://www.html-faq.com/etiquette/?toppost It outlines the arguments quite well. Tom1 ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: ospf cost and route selection (openospfd)

2008-02-13 Thread Eygene Ryabinkin
Josef, good day. Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 09:30:12PM +0100, Josef Pojsl wrote: On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 10:37:29PM +0300, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: Found another OpenBSD/FreeBSD discrepancy: FreeBSD wants to see IP header's length in the native host order, when it sends the packets with