When you say a recent kernel/world, I take it you're still running 7.0?
-Kip
On Feb 12, 2008 11:38 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have two MP/Multicore Xeon boxes with CX4 based Chelsio cards in
them. If I boot 7.0-RC1 the cards can talk to each other. If I build
a recent
At Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:52:52 -0800,
Kip Macy wrote:
Oops sorry ... What is the output of 'sysctl dev.cxgbc.0'?
Here ya go, and thanks!
Later,
George
nozomi8# ifconfig cxgb0
cxgb0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 9000
Hi Tom,
I want to fix the SCTP code such that you can compile without
INET6.
I also wanted to figure out if one can change the SCTP code
such that SCTP can be build with INET6 and without INET...
But it seems that this does not work for FreeBSD without SCTP.
Best regards
Michael
On Feb 13,
On Wed, 2008-02-13 at 12:55 +0100, Michael Tuexen wrote:
Hi Tom,
I want to fix the SCTP code such that you can compile without
INET6.
I also wanted to figure out if one can change the SCTP code
such that SCTP can be build with INET6 and without INET...
But it seems that this does not
Hi Tom,
see my comments in-line.
Best regards
Michael
On Feb 13, 2008, at 1:41 PM, Tom Evans wrote:
On Wed, 2008-02-13 at 12:55 +0100, Michael Tuexen wrote:
Hi Tom,
I want to fix the SCTP code such that you can compile without
INET6.
I also wanted to figure out if one can change the SCTP
Yup. -CURRENT has a very different driver from 7.0. It performs much
better, but I don't want to MFC until it gets more test coverage.
-Kip
On 2/13/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, one more data point.
The issue is somewhere between RC2 and CURRENT. I just put RC2 on
On 2/8/08, Kurt Buff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
My company is getting a fractional DS3 in the near future, and I've
acquired a Sangoma a301 card to handle the interface.
We're retaining one of the T1s we currently have, from a different
provider, and we're intent on using BGP to manage
At Tue, 12 Feb 2008 17:31:57 -0800,
Xin LI [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It looks like that certain (mis)configuration by the baidu.com DNS
administrators has caused this, but I have no clue why our resolver
would return NXDOMAIN after it gets a positive response? (Yes, I know
that _ is not
Josef, good day.
Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 11:53:57AM +0100, Josef Pojsl wrote:
I did try the patch. Unfortunately, the deamon complains about sending packets
over gre interfaces. I cannot see any OSPF traffic on them with tcpdump,
and no routes get added.
Found another OpenBSD/FreeBSD
Nice, concise.
Thanks!
Kurt
On 2/13/08, Nick Rogness [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/8/08, Kurt Buff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
My company is getting a fractional DS3 in the near future, and I've
acquired a Sangoma a301 card to handle the interface.
We're retaining one of the
Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 10:37:29PM +0300, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
Attached is the modified patch for the port itself and the modified
file 'files/patch-ospfd_packet.c': it is the only changed file from
the previous version of my patch. So, if you had already patched
the port to 4.2 with previous
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 wrote:
[snip]
At the beginning I was confused with host(1) and resolver library, they
are different problems, sorry for the confusion.
I think Hajimu-san's analysis was correct that it was caused by the
check in resolver, here
Hello Eygene,
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 10:37:29PM +0300, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
Found another OpenBSD/FreeBSD discrepancy: FreeBSD wants to see IP
header's length in the native host order, when it sends the packets
with sendmsg(). Corrected the patch and tried it on my test setup
with Qemu:
Michael Tuexen wrote:
SNIP
(also, please don't top post)
Why not? I do that a lot...
Please read:
http://www.html-faq.com/etiquette/?toppost
It outlines the arguments quite well.
Tom1
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
Josef, good day.
Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 09:30:12PM +0100, Josef Pojsl wrote:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 10:37:29PM +0300, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
Found another OpenBSD/FreeBSD discrepancy: FreeBSD wants to see IP
header's length in the native host order, when it sends the packets
with
15 matches
Mail list logo