Hi Michael Tuexen!
On Thu, 6 Mar 2008 09:34:13 +0100; Michael Tuexen wrote about 'Re: SCTP using
questions (API etc.)':
substreams. SCTP can do it for me, it's wonderful, but in practice
there
are some questions.
How long can be one particular SCTP message? Can I rely on the fact
that it
Hi Jeremy Chadwick!
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 08:01:43 -0800; Jeremy Chadwick wrote about 'Re: INET6 --
and why I don't use it':
Makes it harder to debug, etc. Don't want to see anything IPv6 related in
command output, to let programs to bind on IPv6 addresses, etc.
Changing the Subject (but
At Mon, 3 Mar 2008 13:43:45 -0800,
Jack Vogel wrote:
The fix to this problem is in the new shared code that got checked into
CURRENT on Friday. I will be MFCing the changes eventually but
if you want to test now you'll need to go with CURRENT.
Rockin. Will this go into 6 as well or is
I should be able to get the shared code part into 6.3 once problems
are wrung out.
Jack
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 8:17 AM, George V. Neville-Neil
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At Mon, 3 Mar 2008 13:43:45 -0800,
Jack Vogel wrote:
The fix to this problem is in the new shared code that got checked
The following reply was made to PR kern/92552; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Bruce Cran [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/92552: A serious bug in most network drivers from 5.X to
6.X (regression)
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2008 23:18:23 +
Hi,
Sorry it's taken
Synopsis: A serious bug in most network drivers from 5.X to 6.X (regression)
State-Changed-From-To: open-feedback
State-Changed-By: vwe
State-Changed-When: Fri Mar 7 23:22:40 UTC 2008
State-Changed-Why:
Note that submitter has been asked for feedback.
Hi,
I had two 6.3-STABLE boxen which have been happily running away for months
on end now without any problems. Last week I upgraded (via buildworld) both
boxes to 7.0-STABLE. Since then I've had reports of some clients being
unable to connect via tcp. I've seen this happen first hand on an
On Fri, 7 Mar 2008, Jake Rizzo wrote:
Hi,
I had two 6.3-STABLE boxen which have been happily running away for months
on end now without any problems. Last week I upgraded (via buildworld) both
boxes to 7.0-STABLE. Since then I've had reports of some clients being
unable to connect via tcp.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jake Rizzo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
16:04:31.445390 IP (tos 0x20, ttl 109, id 41184, offset 0, flags [DF], proto
TCP (6), length 48) x.comcastbusiness.net.22625 192.168.1.104.http: S,
cksum 0x81e2 (correct), 3539746141:3539746141(0) win 16384
Synopsis: [sis] [patch] Problem transmitting runts in if_sis driver
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs-freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: vwe
Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Mar 8 00:21:57 UTC 2008
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Over to maintainer(s). Please have a look at it. Thx!
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 05:53:37PM -0600, David DeSimone wrote:
Jake Rizzo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
16:04:31.445390 IP (tos 0x20, ttl 109, id 41184, offset 0, flags [DF], proto
TCP (6), length 48) x.comcastbusiness.net.22625 192.168.1.104.http: S,
cksum 0x81e2 (correct),
Synopsis: [nfe] [patch] Bring in nfe(4) to RELENG_6
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs-freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: vwe
Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Mar 8 03:40:09 UTC 2008
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Over to maintainer(s).
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=120232
Old Synopsis: Routing to layer-2 address does not work on VLAN interface
New Synopsis: [vlan] Routing to layer-2 address does not work on VLAN interface
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs-freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Mar 8 05:53:10 UTC 2008
Old Synopsis: LOR icmp6_input/nd6_lookup
New Synopsis: [gif] LOR icmp6_input/nd6_lookup
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs-freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Mar 8 06:01:35 UTC 2008
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Over to maintainer(s).
14 matches
Mail list logo
