On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 7:41 AM, Ivan Voras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to connect SE P1i (a "smartphone" device) to FreeBSD, in any
> possible way, via wireless (WLAN). The symptoms are that it just reports
> "Connection failed" no matter what I do.
>
> Acquired data so far:
>
Hello,
from man pim6sd:
"pim6sd requires the node running the daemon to have an IPv6 global
address.".
Does that mean that it must have an IPv6 address which
it address has a global type?
Namely, must it be an address which starts with a global prefix, like
2001::?
Or, if I will set a multic
The following reply was made to PR kern/123066; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Mihail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: misc/123066: kernel trap with ipsec
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 05:46:54 +
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 04:13:40AM +
Old Synopsis: kernel trap with ipsec
New Synopsis: [ipsec] [panic] kernel trap with ipsec
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Apr 25 04:42:50 UTC 2008
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Reclassify and assign.
http://www.freeb
Hi,
I'd like to connect SE P1i (a "smartphone" device) to FreeBSD, in any
possible way, via wireless (WLAN). The symptoms are that it just reports
"Connection failed" no matter what I do.
Acquired data so far:
0) I'm trying adhoc mode without any authorization, for now, just to get
it worki
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 03:27:53PM +0400, Igor Sysoev wrote:
> The problem that FreeBSD has small KVA space: only 2G even on amd64 32G
> machines.
>
> So with
>
> vm.kmem_size=1G
> # 64M KVA
> kern.maxbcache=64M
> # 4M KVA
> kern.ipc.maxpipekva=4M
>
>
> I can use something like this:
>
> # 25
You need to do do a one-to-one NAT, so protocol 94 (IPIP) packets get forwarded.
It's not TCP or UDP, so no ports there.
Alternatively, you can set up a NAT traversing IPSEC-in-UDP tunnel, but that
requires a kernel patch.
Baldur
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 08:11:34AM -0400, Steve Bertrand wrote:
>
* Jeremy Chadwick ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > I added it directly to the 2nd CPU (diagram on page 9 of
> > http://www.tyan.com/manuals/m_s2895_101.pdf) and the problem
> > seems to be the interaction between nfe0 and powerd :
>
> That board is the weirdest thing I've seen in years.
K8WE
The following reply was made to PR kern/123053; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Martin Matuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/123053: [re] re(4) unsupported hardware revision
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:39:54 +0200
This seems to be another 81
24.04.08, 18:39, [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Old Synopsis: re(4) unsupported hardware revision
> New Synopsis: [re] re(4) unsupported hardware revision
> Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
> Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
> Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Apr 24 14:39:41 UTC 2008
> Res
Sorry to respond off-topic, however, why would you need Packet Filter,
if you were using ipfw and dummynet?
On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 13:49 +0200, Jon Otterholm wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Has anyone got a solution to the rdr-problem when using PF together with
> Dummynet/IPFW?
>
> I found this thread from
Old Synopsis: re(4) unsupported hardware revision
New Synopsis: [re] re(4) unsupported hardware revision
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Apr 24 14:39:41 UTC 2008
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Over to maintainer(s).
h
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008, [windows-1252] Nejc koberne wrote:
> > I can't help wondering what would happen if you assigned the single jail
> > IP to be the subnet's broadcast address, in this case 192.168.15.255 ?
>
> You mean if I did this:
>
> jail_samba_ip="192.168.15.255"
>
> ? I can't e
Hello,
I´m from Brazil, new here and people call me Bilouro.
I´m participating of GSoc, with project TCP/IP regression test
suite(tcptest) with mentoring of George (gnn).
On 4/24/08, Rui Paulo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 23 Apr 2008, at 20:37, Huang, Yusheng wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was
Nejc Škoberne wrote:
Hey,
ifconfig_rl0_alias0="192.168.15.201 netmask 255.255.255.0"
the mask of an alias ipadres needs to be 32 bits.
I do not now if this solves your problem but it needs to be 32 bits.
ifconfig_rl0_alias0="192.168.15.201 netmask 255.255.255.255"
Can you explain why it nee
Baldur Gislason wrote:
It'll work fine. I've done this several times before.
Hmmm. I still can't seem to get this setup to work. The FreeBSD box is
in behind a Fortigate 200 unit.
However I've also had NAT implementations which didn't work this way but
this one should definitely work.
Are
Hi.
Has anyone got a solution to the rdr-problem when using PF together with
Dummynet/IPFW?
I found this thread from 2006 which describes the problem in detail:
http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/net/2006-07/msg00048.html
//Jon
___
fre
On 23 Apr 2008, at 20:37, Huang, Yusheng wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if "RFC 2861 TCP Congestion Window Validation" been
implemented in FreeBSD?
Thanks!
The authors of the RFC quote HPF99. HPF99, according to the RFC, has
implementation information regarding to FreeBSD 3.2 (I haven't
Hey,
ifconfig_rl0_alias0="192.168.15.201 netmask 255.255.255.0"
the mask of an alias ipadres needs to be 32 bits.
I do not now if this solves your problem but it needs to be 32 bits.
ifconfig_rl0_alias0="192.168.15.201 netmask 255.255.255.255"
I tried with 24 bits - it doesn't work one way o
Hello,
Try not to use jail_samba_interface="rl0" for "auto aliasing" and add
ifconfig_rl0_alias0="inet 192.168.15.201 netmask 255.255.255.0"
This should give you
inet 192.168.15.201 netmask 0x broadcast 192.168.15.255
in the ifconfig output (after restart)
Okay. Now I can see this fr
Nejc Škoberne wrote:
Hi,
so what kind of setup do you have?
Sorry, forgot to provide it. I am running latest Samba 3 on FreeBSD 7.0
server.
You can get my smb.conf here:
http://stuff.skoberne.net/smb.conf (without "remote" entries suggested
by Dewayne)
My rc.conf (relevant lines):
if
Hey,
I can't help wondering what would happen if you assigned the single jail
IP to be the subnet's broadcast address, in this case 192.168.15.255 ?
You mean if I did this:
jail_samba_ip="192.168.15.255"
? I can't even ssh to the host then? And it doesn't work.
Nejc
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008, [windows-1252] Nejc koberne wrote:
> > what netmask does ifconfig show for this IP?
>
> Host:
>
> rl0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500
> options=8
> ether 00:40:f4:27:7e:a8
> inet 192.168.15.198 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.15.255
>
Nejc koberne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Hi,
> so what kind of setup do you have?
Sorry, forgot to provide it. I am running latest Samba 3 on FreeBSD 7.0 server.
You can get my smb.conf here:
http://stuff.skoberne.net/smb.conf (without "remote" entries suggested by
Dewayne)
My rc.conf (re
Hey,
I think you've answered the question. Thanks Bjorn, I setup samba
within a jail a few years ago and had forgotten the interface setup.
Nejc, this is my interface config, the jail is at 10.1.2.46
inside: flags=8843 mtu 1500
options=1b
inet 10.1.2.2 netmask 0x broa
Hey,
The firewalling allows UDP137,138; TCP 139,445; and WINS is defined on
the client end; so name resolution occurs via the PDC. I'm afraid that
Maybe this is the reason why it works for you. I don't want to use WINS, only
NetBIOS broadcasts. Windows machines have no WINS server set up.
T
Hi,
so what kind of setup do you have?
Sorry, forgot to provide it. I am running latest Samba 3 on FreeBSD 7.0 server.
You can get my smb.conf here:
http://stuff.skoberne.net/smb.conf (without "remote" entries suggested by
Dewayne)
My rc.conf (relevant lines):
ifconfig_rl0="192.168.15.198
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008, Nejc ?koberne wrote:
Hi,
..
seem to
be ignored by samba (although I can see them with tcpdump). This works for
you?
so what kind of setup do you have?
is the jail IP on a real interface or on loopback?
is the jail IP an alias or a primary IP?
what netmask does ifconfig
Hello Dewayne,
I have encountered a similar problem, when I configured a SAMBA PDC over
the wan (through IPSEC of course). You might like to consider using
these in your smb.conf:
hosts allow = 10.1. 10.2.
remote announce = 10.1.1.255 10.2.1.255
remote browse sync = 10.1.1.255 10.2.1.255
I
Mark Hills wrote:
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008, Andre Oppermann wrote:
http://people.freebsd.org/~andre/tcp_output-error-log.diff
Please apply this patch and enable the sysctl net.inet.tcp.log_debug=1
and report any output. You likely get some (normal) noise from syncache.
What we are looking for is r
Hello,
I am trying to run Samba server inside a jail and use NetBIOS broadcasts. Is
there
any way to let Samba "see" the broadcasts even if it is running in a jail? One
guy
at freebsd-questions hinted that jailed processes cannot see the broadcasts.
If this is not possible at the moment, how a
31 matches
Mail list logo
