Re: multiple routing tables review patch ready for simple testing.

2008-05-02 Thread John Hay
This confuses me The whole point of a FIB is to decide the *next* hop for a given input packet. So questions. 1) A packet arrives on an interface. If this interface is associated with more than one FIB, which FIB does it get given to? which ever one you select, using the

Re: kern/120725: [bce] On board second lan port 'bce1' with Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM5708 1000Base-T 0.9.6 driver in Dell 1950 and 2950 behave super slow

2008-05-02 Thread vwe
Synopsis: [bce] On board second lan port 'bce1' with Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM5708 1000Base-T 0.9.6 driver in Dell 1950 and 2950 behave super slow State-Changed-From-To: feedback-closed State-Changed-By: vwe State-Changed-When: Fri May 2 09:47:48 UTC 2008 State-Changed-Why: We're sorry to not

authentication timeouts with ath(4) in hostap mode

2008-05-02 Thread Petar Bogdanovic
Hi, I'm using an alix2c0 board with two winstron CM9 ath(4)-cards and FreeBSD 7: ifconfig ath0 (...) mediaopt hostap mode 11a channel 36 ssid sn.a -bgscan ifconfig ath1 (...) mediaopt hostap mode 11g channel 11 ssid sn.g -bgscan When I try to raise the traffic (i.e. dd | ssh

Re: multiple routing tables review patch ready for simple testing.

2008-05-02 Thread Bruce M. Simpson
John Hay wrote: The linux guys seems to have multiple fibs (or whatever they call them) which they can chain together by giving them different priorities. The effect seems to be that a packet will be matched through the highest priority fib to the lowest until a route match is found en then is

Re: multiple routing tables review patch ready for simple testing.

2008-05-02 Thread John Hay
On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 04:44:20PM +0100, Bruce M. Simpson wrote: John Hay wrote: The linux guys seems to have multiple fibs (or whatever they call them) which they can chain together by giving them different priorities. The effect seems to be that a packet will be matched through the highest

Re: multiple routing tables review patch ready for simple testing.

2008-05-02 Thread Julian Elischer
John Hay wrote: This confuses me The whole point of a FIB is to decide the *next* hop for a given input packet. So questions. 1) A packet arrives on an interface. If this interface is associated with more than one FIB, which FIB does it get given to? which ever one you select, using

Re: multiple routing tables review patch ready for simple testing.

2008-05-02 Thread Julian Elischer
Julian Elischer wrote: John Hay wrote: This confuses me The whole point of a FIB is to decide the *next* hop for a given input packet. So questions. 1) A packet arrives on an interface. If this interface is associated with more than one FIB, which FIB does it get given to? which

Re: read() returns ETIMEDOUT on steady TCP connection

2008-05-02 Thread Andre Oppermann
Mark Hills wrote: On Wed, 23 Apr 2008, Andre Oppermann wrote: http://people.freebsd.org/~andre/tcp_output-error-log.diff Please apply this patch and enable the sysctl net.inet.tcp.log_debug=1 and report any output. You likely get some (normal) noise from syncache. What we are looking for is

Re: Not All Symbols Present in a Loadable Kernel Module

2008-05-02 Thread Alexander Sack
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 10:04 PM, David Christensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm trying to build the bce driver as a kernel module under RELENG_7 but I'm finding that not all of the functions in the driver are exported as symbols. This makes it difficult to call a function from ddb because

Re: kern/123330: [nsswitch] Enabling samba wins in nsswitch.conf causes sshd, ftpd, etc services to die

2008-05-02 Thread linimon
Old Synopsis: Enabling samba wins in nsswitch.conf causes sshd, ftpd, etc services to die New Synopsis: [nsswitch] Enabling samba wins in nsswitch.conf causes sshd, ftpd, etc services to die Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-i386-freebsd-net Responsible-Changed-By: linimon

Re: multiple routing tables review patch ready for simple testing.

2008-05-02 Thread Bruce M. Simpson
Julian Elischer wrote: OLSR is an overlay network Nope -- the express intention was that it could be used for basic IP connectivity, for mobile devices. In OLSR, every node is a potential IP forwarder unless it explicitly advertises itself as being unwilling to forward. and any machine

Re: multiple routing tables review patch ready for simple testing.

2008-05-02 Thread Bruce M. Simpson
John Hay wrote: You don't need to go to the kernel for this sort of thing unless you specifically need to implement route policy based on which interface(s) a packet came in on. Yes I know that. But in the world of adhoc wireless mesh networking there are very few non-linux people, so

RE: Not All Symbols Present in a Loadable Kernel Module

2008-05-02 Thread David Christensen
I'm trying to build the bce driver as a kernel module under RELENG_7 but I'm finding that not all of the functions in the driver are exported as symbols. This makes it difficult to call a function from ddb because I get the error Symbol not found. I'm building and loading the

Re: authentication timeouts with ath(4) in hostap mode

2008-05-02 Thread Sam Leffler
Petar Bogdanovic wrote: Hi, I'm using an alix2c0 board with two winstron CM9 ath(4)-cards and FreeBSD 7: ifconfig ath0 (...) mediaopt hostap mode 11a channel 36 ssid sn.a -bgscan ifconfig ath1 (...) mediaopt hostap mode 11g channel 11 ssid sn.g -bgscan When I try to raise

Re: Network Instability when upgrading to 4GB of RAM

2008-05-02 Thread Paul Haddad
All, As a follow up to myself I installed an Intel PCIe NIC and disabled the on board RTL based one and all my problems went away. Been running with 4GB installed for a couple days now with absolutely no network issues. So seems like there's some problem with RTL NICs and = 4GB of RAM. -- Paul