Re: IPPROTO_DIVERT and PF_INET6

2008-05-06 Thread Bruce M. Simpson
Julian Elischer wrote: you could implement a whole new protocol family of which there was a single protocol.. divert. That's sheer overkill for what Edwin needs to be able to do. We already have a bunch of apps which use divert sockets in the IPv4 space, why should the existing semantics chang

Re: Problems with netgraph

2008-05-06 Thread David DeSimone
Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > unfortunatly I've been totally ignoring this thread because it said > "trouble with em" in the topic.. > If you'd said "trouble with mpd" then maybe I'd have looked earlier.. In the poster's defense, the only symptom that started this was this info f

Re: multiple routing tables review patch ready for simple testing.

2008-05-06 Thread Julian Elischer
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: On Tue, 29 Apr 2008, Julian Elischer wrote: Hi, The patch can be found at http://www.freebsd.org/~julian/mrt.diff (or http://www.freebsd.org/~julian/mrt6.diff for RELENG_6) or source can be taken from perforce at: //depot/user/julian/routing/src So after looking at the

Re: multiple routing tables review patch ready for simple testing.

2008-05-06 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008, Julian Elischer wrote: Hi, The patch can be found at http://www.freebsd.org/~julian/mrt.diff (or http://www.freebsd.org/~julian/mrt6.diff for RELENG_6) or source can be taken from perforce at: //depot/user/julian/routing/src So after looking at the patch a bit more again

Re: Problems with netgraph

2008-05-06 Thread Oleksandr Samoylyk
Julian Elischer wrote: Oleksandr Samoylyk wrote: Dear developers, Please read this thread: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2008-May/017891.html I'm using no encryption and no compression in mpd, so netgraph should fly. It seems to get bad after 500 sessions... In FreeBSD 6 -

Re: Problems with netgraph

2008-05-06 Thread Oleksandr Samoylyk
Julian Elischer wrote: Oleksandr Samoylyk wrote: Dear developers, Please read this thread: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2008-May/017891.html I'm using no encryption and no compression in mpd, so netgraph should fly. It seems to get bad after 500 sessions... In FreeBSD 6 -

Re: Problems with netgraph

2008-05-06 Thread Julian Elischer
Oleksandr Samoylyk wrote: Dear developers, Please read this thread: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2008-May/017891.html I'm using no encryption and no compression in mpd, so netgraph should fly. It seems to get bad after 500 sessions... In FreeBSD 6 - it's swi1: net - 100% CPU

Re: Problems with netgraph

2008-05-06 Thread Oleksandr Samoylyk
Oleksandr Samoylyk пишет: Oleksandr Samoylyk wrote: Dear developers, Please read this thread: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2008-May/017891.html I'm using no encryption and no compression in mpd, so netgraph should fly. It seems to get bad after 500 sessions... In FreeBSD 6

Problems with netgraph

2008-05-06 Thread Oleksandr Samoylyk
Dear developers, Please read this thread: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2008-May/017891.html I'm using no encryption and no compression in mpd, so netgraph should fly. It seems to get bad after 500 sessions... In FreeBSD 6 - it's swi1: net - 100% CPU In FreeBSD 7 - it's em0 tas

Re: Problems with netgraph

2008-05-06 Thread Oleksandr Samoylyk
Oleksandr Samoylyk wrote: Dear developers, Please read this thread: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2008-May/017891.html I'm using no encryption and no compression in mpd, so netgraph should fly. It seems to get bad after 500 sessions... In FreeBSD 6 - it's swi1: net - 100% CPU

Re: Troubles with em on FreeBSD 7

2008-05-06 Thread Julian Elischer
Oleksandr Samoylyk wrote: A bit experiments and it's was detected that it is a netgraph related problem. Whom can I address the problem? Thanks to Paul. [EMAIL PROTECTED] send details and one of us will look at it.. ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org m

Re: Not All Symbols Present in a Loadable Kernel Module

2008-05-06 Thread Alexander Sack
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 3:28 AM, Bruce Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 5 May 2008, Alexander Sack wrote: > > For my own edification, unless you specifically mark a function > > inline, will gcc really optimize them out? That seems a little > > overboard unless there is some compiler opti

Re: Troubles with em on FreeBSD 7

2008-05-06 Thread Oleksandr Samoylyk
A bit experiments and it's was detected that it is a netgraph related problem. Whom can I address the problem? Thanks to Paul. -- Oleksandr Samoylyk OVS-RIPE ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd

Re: Not All Symbols Present in a Loadable Kernel Module

2008-05-06 Thread Martes G Wigglesworth
I thought that the "inline" switch was specific to C++ and C and not gcc, hence the standard for the language says to add the inline parameter to explicitly produce optimized code. Unless gcc is not standard, I don't see why the compiler would automatically optimize the coded function to "inline."

Re: OS throws away large packets

2008-05-06 Thread Mr Y
> > > >>> Hi all, > > >>> > > >>> I'm trying to implement Large Recieve Offload for an > > >>> > > >> Ethernet driver > > >> > > >>> on FreeBSD 6.3, but all my >MTU packets are being thrown > > by the OS. > > >>> I'm using mbuf chains in this imlpementation, each mbuf is > > >>> > > >> a cluster >

Re: Not All Symbols Present in a Loadable Kernel Module

2008-05-06 Thread Bruce Evans
On Mon, 5 May 2008, Alexander Sack wrote: For my own edification, unless you specifically mark a function inline, will gcc really optimize them out? That seems a little overboard unless there is some compiler option that says its okay to do that. I guess that would be very easy to test if you