Brooks Davis wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 06:30:05PM -0700, Peter Losher wrote:
Randy Bush wrote:
this has been a cause of great pain for a lng time.
http://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/hpn-ssh/
as openssh seems not to be fixing it (and i do not consider a 2mb fixed
buffer to be
Garrett Wollman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Am I the only one who would be happier if openssh were not in the base
system at all? I always have to install the port anyway; having it in
the base just gives me more files I need to delete after an install.
Well, it's not going to get any better if
Hi All,
I am running FreeBSD 6.2-release. I have been running PAT via natd
and ipfw for some time now and it runs great. However, I continue to
try and employ static NAT on this router, and as soon as I do so all
other clients lose routing. My natd.conf is as below:
unregistered_only
Synopsis: RTM_MISS with the transit packets
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs-freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: remko
Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Jun 13 14:39:07 UTC 2008
Responsible-Changed-Why:
This looks like networking code :)
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=124540
Someone I know got a
http://www.buy.com/prod/thinkpad-11a-b-g-wireless-lan-mini-pci-express-adapter-network-adapter/q/loc/101/201992199.html
and it works well.
-Boris
Paolo Pisati wrote:
Hi,
as the subjects says i'm looking for a freebsd-supported wifi express card.
I know i should look for
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 13:04:08 +0200, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Garrett Wollman wrote:
Am I the only one who would be happier if openssh were not in the base
system at all?
Quite possibly :)
I don't think it's at all viable to ship FreeBSD without an ssh client
in this day and
Jack Vogel wrote:
Did you ever install the fix to the 82573 NIC eeprom?
Just saw the watchdog error using an Intel Pro Quad PT card...
it has the '82571EB' chip on it.
-- Do those cards need the eeprom 'fix'?
-- or is related to kern/122928
-- how does one go about disabling the watchdog?
Tom Judge wrote this message on Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 15:01 -0500:
Bill Moran wrote:
In response to R J [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I am trying to use tcpdump (or snort, but they are both behaving the same
in this case) to capture all the lines or contents of an msn
chat session, the actual
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 23:11:13 -0400 (EDT)
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Brooks
Am I the only one who would be happier if openssh were not in the base
system at all? I always have to install the port anyway; having it in
the base just gives me more files I need to delete after an install.
From: Steven Hartland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 03:32:39 +0100
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 23:11:13 -0400 (EDT)
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Brooks
Am I the only one who would be happier if openssh were not in the base
system at all? I always have to install the port
Just saw the watchdog error using an Intel Pro Quad PT card...
more info: doing about 100Mbps plugged into a Cisco 2960:
Gi0/23mango-em2 connected a-full a-1000 10/100/1000BaseTX
Would setting the duplex and speed manually (instead of using auto-negotionation) help prevent
11 matches
Mail list logo
