On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 6:07 PM, Mike Tancsa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 02:44 PM 7/7/2008, Paul wrote:
Also my 82571 NIC supports multiple received queues and multiple transmit
queues so why hasn't
anyone written the driver to support this? It's not a 10gb card and it
still supports it and
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 6:22 PM, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I read through the IGB driver, and it says 82575/6 only... which is the new
chip Intel is releasing on the cards this month 2 port
and october 4 port, but the chips are on some of the motherboards right now.
Why can't it also use
On Mon, 7 Jul 2008, Artem Belevich wrote:
As was already mentioned, we can't avoid all cache misses as there's data
that's recently been updated in memory via DMA and therefor kicked out of
cache.
However, we may hide some of the latency penalty by prefetching
'interesting' data early.
Hi,
Kip Macy wrote:
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 6:07 PM, Mike Tancsa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 02:44 PM 7/7/2008, Paul wrote:
Also my 82571 NIC supports multiple received queues and multiple transmit
queues so why hasn't
anyone written the driver to support this? It's not a 10gb card
I have a pre-production card. With some bug fixes and some tuning of
interrupt handling (custom stack - I've been asked to push the changes
back in to CVS, I just don't have time right now) an otherwise
unoptimized igb can forward 1.04Mpps from one port to another (1.04
Mpps in on igb0 and
Will someone confirm if it will support the 82571EB ? I don't see a
reason why not as it's very similar hardware
and it's available now in large quantities so making 82571 part of igb I
think would be a good idea.
Kip Macy wrote:
I have a pre-production card. With some bug fixes and some
Hi all,
I have implemented an network application in kernel space and it
is working fine. The application involves 3 network interfaces that
FreeBSD 6.3 can forward mbuf between em0 and em1 in a rate 1.3 - 1.4
millions packets per second. Em2 is used for controlling the network
On Mon, 7 Jul 2008, Erik Trulsson wrote:
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 10:30:53PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jul 2008, Andre Oppermann wrote:
The theoretical maximum at 64byte frames is 1,488,100. I've looked
up my notes the 1.244Mpps number can be ajusted to 1.488Mpps.
Where is the
Joe Kuan wrote:
Hi all,
I have implemented an network application in kernel space and it is
working fine. The application involves 3 network interfaces that FreeBSD
6.3 can forward mbuf between em0 and em1 in a rate 1.3 - 1.4 millions
packets per second. Em2 is used for controlling the
On 8 Jul 2008, at 12:35, Ivan Voras wrote:
Joe Kuan wrote:
Hi all,
I have implemented an network application in kernel space and it is
working fine. The application involves 3 network interfaces that
FreeBSD
6.3 can forward mbuf between em0 and em1 in a rate 1.3 - 1.4 millions
packets
On Tuesday 08 July 2008 03:32:40 Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2008-Jul-07 16:15:40 +, Achim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Performance with a single client is degraded when the client is smbmount
and downloading.
With a second transfer in any direction, performance becomes better, to
about 3.5
Hi,
Kip Macy wrote:
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 6:22 PM, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I read through the IGB driver, and it says 82575/6 only... which is the new
chip Intel is releasing on the cards this month 2 port
and october 4 port, but the chips are on some of the motherboards right now.
On 7/8/08, Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There were some patches floating around for if_em to do a prefetch of the
first bit of packet data on packets before handing them up the stack. My
I found Andre Oppermann's optimization patch mentioned in july 2005
status report:
But this is probably no routing table, and single source and dst ips or
very limited number of ips and ports.
the entire problem with Linux is the route cache, try and generate
random source ips and random source/dst ports
and it won't even do 100kpps without problems.
I would like to log into
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Brian McGinty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a pre-production card. With some bug fixes and some tuning of
interrupt handling (custom stack - I've been asked to push the changes
back in to CVS, I just don't have time right now) an otherwise
unoptimized igb can
I have a pre-production card. With some bug fixes and some tuning of
interrupt handling (custom stack - I've been asked to push the changes
back in to CVS, I just don't have time right now) an otherwise
unoptimized igb can forward 1.04Mpps from one port to another (1.04
Mpps in on igb0 and
16 matches
Mail list logo
