Ed Schouten wrote:
Hello everyone,
Before I start talking about any technical stuff, I want to mention I'm
so far pretty happy with the MPSAFE TTY import. Even though I spent a
lot of time close to my mailbox, the amount of troubles caused by the
import have remained pretty low (there's only one
* Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> got a p4 pointer?
Yes. It's just in //depot/projects/mpsafetty/..., just like where the
MPSAFE TTY code used to live.
--
Ed Schouten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
WWW: http://80386.nl/
pgp0H7hcpoTEP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
The following reply was made to PR kern/114714; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (dfilter service)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/114714: commit references a PR
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 04:04:05 + (UTC)
thompsa 2008-08-22 03:55:37 UTC
FreeBSD src repo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only thing i can think of is that it's the UDP checksum,
residing beyond hlen, which is overwritten somewhere in the
call to if_simloop -- in which case perhaps a better fix is
to m_pullup() the udp header as well ?
It is the checksum that gets trashed, yes.
..
Ed Schouten wrote:
Hello everyone,
Before I start talking about any technical stuff, I want to mention I'm
so far pretty happy with the MPSAFE TTY import. Even though I spent a
lot of time close to my mailbox, the amount of troubles caused by the
import have remained pretty low (there's only one
At Thu, 21 Aug 2008 22:35:19 +0200,
Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 03:11:56PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Turns out there is a bug in the code that loops back multicast
> > packets. If the underlying device driver supports checksum offloading
> > then the pack
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 03:11:56PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Turns out there is a bug in the code that loops back multicast
> packets. If the underlying device driver supports checksum offloading
> then the packet that is looped back, when it is transmitted on the
> wire, is incor
Hello everyone,
Before I start talking about any technical stuff, I want to mention I'm
so far pretty happy with the MPSAFE TTY import. Even though I spent a
lot of time close to my mailbox, the amount of troubles caused by the
import have remained pretty low (there's only one open bug report,
rel
Hi,
Turns out there is a bug in the code that loops back multicast
packets. If the underlying device driver supports checksum offloading
then the packet that is looped back, when it is transmitted on the
wire, is incorrect, due to the fact that the packet is not fully
copied.
Here is a patch. C
Here is the output from my ifconfig (I rename rl0.100 and rl0.2101 in vlan0
and vlan1, the RJ45 wire is disconected because i need internet in order to
send this message :p ):
rl0: flags=8843 mtu 1500
options=8
inet6 fe80::2e0:4dff:fe30:80e1%rl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1
eth
Javier Ubillos wrote:
> Hi freebsd-net.
> (Sorry for cross posting. This time I think I found the right forum for
> my question)
>
> I'm implementing a NAT (1 ip - 1 ip) like router. (it's not actually
> NAT, but it's a good analogy for this case).
>
> I have chosen to use pcaplib to pick up the
Brooks Davis wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 03:13:00PM +0200, Popof Popof wrote:
Hi,
I have a FreeBSD 6.0 box andi need to configure it in a way that I must use
2 vlans under one interface and both of them will get an address thanks to
dhclient.
So in order to make this job I created vlans:
i
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 03:13:00PM +0200, Popof Popof wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a FreeBSD 6.0 box andi need to configure it in a way that I must use
> 2 vlans under one interface and both of them will get an address thanks to
> dhclient.
>
> So in order to make this job I created vlans:
>
> ifconfig
I tried to change the MAC address of rl0.2101 and rl0.100 but this not
changed anything.
Any other idea ?
PS: The exact parameter of ifconfig is lladdr
2008/8/21 Dewayne Geraghty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> --- On *Wed, 8/20/08, Popof Popof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>* wrote:
> From: Popof Popof <[EMAIL PROTE
On 8/21/08, Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Does anyone know whether the above mentionned bsd systems boot to a ram
> disk or keep their filesystem on teh flash/disk?
pfSense keeps the filesystem and m0n0wall runs out of a memory backed system.
Hope this helps,
Scott
Old Synopsis: CARP interface renaming makes system no longer respond on the
virtual IP address
New Synopsis: [carp] CARP interface renaming makes system no longer respond on
the virtual IP address
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 8:20 AM, Garrett Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Comments inline.
>
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 1:03 AM, Pyun YongHyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 11:45:48PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> > Hi Pyun!
>> > I know it's been a while since I
Old Synopsis: 1.4.7 ixgbe driver panic with 4GB and PAE
New Synopsis: [ixgbe] [patch] 1.4.7 ixgbe driver panic with 4GB and PAE
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Aug 21 09:34:08 UTC 2008
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Ov
18 matches
Mail list logo
