>> Hello, freebsd-net mailing list.
>>
>> We have server such configurtion:
>> - 2 quadcore AMD Opteron processors;
>> - 4 GB RAM;
>> - NIC Intel Pro/1000 PT, Dual Port Server Adapter.
>>
>> ###
>>
>> Problem:
>>
>> in some moments of time, a
Hi all,
CRPC version 0.7.5 is released.
CRPC or C-based Remote Procedure Call is a remote procedure call system
with automatic parallelization capabilities integrated into C language.
The project site is http://crpc.sourceforge.net/
Regards,
Andrey Babanin.
__
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 06:30:03PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Noyou misunderstood. The 7.1 box was connected to a 5.4 box doing a 50GB
> data transfer over rsync. Both nics were 1000 full duplex with a crossover
> cable.
> The speed performance was terrible and I could only get up to
Note: to view an individual PR, use:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number).
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including
experimental development code and obsolete releases.
S Tracker
Dear Pyun,
thanx for your prompt answer (as usual).
Pyun YongHyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 11:21:00PM +0200, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've serious network performance problems on a HP Turion X2
> > based brand new notebook; I onl
Synopsis: arp: Segmentation fault (core dumped)
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-i386->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: remko
Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Sep 29 19:47:28 UTC 2008
Responsible-Changed-Why:
reassign to net
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=127719
_
On Mon, 29 Sep 2008, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
However, the "request/respones" tests are awfull for my notebook (test
repeated on the notebook for the sake of conviction) :
Is it possible to rerun these tests with a 7.0 kernel of the same general
configuration? That would help us determine if
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 09:10:29PM +0100, Robert Watson wrote:
>
> On Mon, 29 Sep 2008, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
>
> >However, the "request/respones" tests are awfull for my notebook (test
> >repeated on the notebook for the sake of conviction) :
>
> Is it possible to rerun these tests with a 7.
> Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 11:03:10 +0200
> From: Holger Kipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 06:30:03PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Noyou misunderstood. The 7.1 box was connected to a 5.4 box
> doing a 50GB > data transfer over rsync. Both
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 2:03 AM, Holger Kipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 06:30:03PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Noyou misunderstood. The 7.1 box was connected to a 5.4 box doing a 50GB
>> data transfer over rsync. Both nics were 1000 full duplex with a crossove
On Mon, 29 Sep 2008, Ryan French wrote:
I'm having a bit of trouble with my MPLS protocol code at the moment. I have
the code written and compiling (mostly based on some OpenBSD code I was
shown) but when an MPLS packet is received it doesnt appear as thou my
mpls_input routine is being calle
Hi Ryan,
Did you initialize the .pr_init member of struct protosw for MPLS?
AFAIK, MPLS does not use an outer IP header, so adding a struct
ipprotosw won't work; they are similar structs however.
cheers
BMS
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
h
Hi,
Thanks for the help. I managed to figure out that the problem was I had left
out the DOMAIN_SET command in my code, but I've got that sorted now and am
just working through bugs in my code causing page faults whenever an MPLS
packet is received. Should hopefully have something up and running b
Old Synopsis: rtfree: 0xc5a8f870 has 1 refs
New Synopsis: [rtalloc] rtfree: 0xc5a8f870 has 1 refs
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Sep 30 00:40:50 UTC 2008
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Over to maintainer(s).
http://w
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 04:12:56PM +0200, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
[...]
> >
> > AFAIK it seems that you're the first one that reports poor
> > performance issue of MCP65.
>
>
> someone must be ;) no kiddin, I am not convinced this is (only)
> a driver issue (cf. "bad NFS/UDP performance
15 matches
Mail list logo
