hello,all guys.I'm a newer for using bsd,I come from china. I have no
ideal now because i setup the ppp.conf and resolv.conf(add the dns
server),but ppp is still not work!I delete all the things in ppp.conf
,then add a label adsl and authname key ,but when i ppp -auto adsl ,it
can link lan but not
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 01:10:50PM -0700, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 02:28:26PM +0400, Igor Sysoev wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have several hosts running FreeBSD/amd64 7.2-STABLE updated on 11.01.2010
> > and 25.02.2010. Hosts process about 10K input and 10K output packets/s
> >
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 03:58:30PM -0500, Tom Judge wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am just following up on the thread from March (I think) about this issue.
>
> We are seeing this issue on a number of systems running 7.1.
>
> The systems in question are all Dell:
>
> * R710 R610 R410
> * PE2950
>
> The l
The following reply was made to PR kern/148322; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: dfil...@freebsd.org (dfilter service)
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/148322: commit references a PR
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 22:28:07 + (UTC)
pgollucci2010-09-09 22:28:03 UTC
FreeBS
On Sun, Sep 05, 2010 at 07:11:59PM +0200, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
> On Sunday 05 September 2010 18:52:05 Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
> > On Sunday 05 September 2010 17:53:08 Bruce Cran wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I was trying to help someone on IRC with a card that should be
> > > supported by the mw
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 01:10:50PM -0700, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 02:28:26PM +0400, Igor Sysoev wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have several hosts running FreeBSD/amd64 7.2-STABLE updated on 11.01.2010
> > and 25.02.2010. Hosts process about 10K input and 10K output packets/s
> >
On 9 Sep 2010, at 14:45, John Nielsen wrote:
> On Sep 8, 2010, at 8:32 AM, Rui Paulo wrote:
>
>> On 7 Sep 2010, at 19:41, John Nielsen wrote:
>>
>>> I am working on a network scenario which would benefit greatly from the
>>> MIMO features and higher bandwidth of 802.11n. It's my understanding t
Hi,
I am just following up on the thread from March (I think) about this issue.
We are seeing this issue on a number of systems running 7.1.
The systems in question are all Dell:
* R710 R610 R410
* PE2950
The latter do not show the issue as much as the R series systems.
The cards in one of t
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 02:28:26PM +0400, Igor Sysoev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have several hosts running FreeBSD/amd64 7.2-STABLE updated on 11.01.2010
> and 25.02.2010. Hosts process about 10K input and 10K output packets/s
> without issues. One of them, however, is loaded more than others, so it
> pr
>
> Thank you guys. Im going to try disablling PF and let only IPFW + Dummynet
> working, i will also disable flowtable.
>
What do you think about net.isr ? Could it help in my situation ?
Thanks
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.fre
On Sep 8, 2010, at 8:32 AM, Rui Paulo wrote:
> On 7 Sep 2010, at 19:41, John Nielsen wrote:
>
>> I am working on a network scenario which would benefit greatly from the MIMO
>> features and higher bandwidth of 802.11n. It's my understanding that 11n is
>> not fully supported in FreeBSD since th
2010/9/9 Igor Sysoev :
> Hi,
>
> I have several hosts running FreeBSD/amd64 7.2-STABLE updated on 11.01.2010
> and 25.02.2010. Hosts process about 10K input and 10K output packets/s
> without issues. One of them, however, is loaded more than others, so it
> processes 20K/20K packets/s.
>
> Recently
Hi,
I have several hosts running FreeBSD/amd64 7.2-STABLE updated on 11.01.2010
and 25.02.2010. Hosts process about 10K input and 10K output packets/s
without issues. One of them, however, is loaded more than others, so it
processes 20K/20K packets/s.
Recently, I have upgraded one host to 7.3-STA
Hi,
I have several hosts running FreeBSD/amd64 7.2-STABLE updated on 11.01.2010
and 25.02.2010. Hosts process about 10K input and 10K output packets/s
without issues. One of them, however, is loaded more than others, so it
processes 20K/20K packets/s.
Recently, I have upgraded one host to 7.3-STA
On Tue, 31 Aug 2010, Garrett Wollman wrote:
In article <4c7d02bb.40...@freebsd.org> an...@freebsd.org writes:
sendto() will not be touched or modified. It's just that on a TCP socket
the tcp protocol will not perform an implied connect anymore. The only
thing that changes is TCP dropping a
15 matches
Mail list logo