Re: [patch] WOL support for nfe(4)

2010-11-09 Thread Yamagi Burmeister
Thanks for your reply. On Mon, 8 Nov 2010, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: Thanks for the patch. I attached slightly modified the code to better match other WOL capable drivers in tree. Because data sheet is not available I blindly made a patch based on your code. I have a couple of questions which I ca

Re: [patch] WOL support for nfe(4)

2010-11-09 Thread Pyun YongHyeon
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 09:49:14AM +0100, Yamagi Burmeister wrote: > > Thanks for your reply. > > On Mon, 8 Nov 2010, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > > >Thanks for the patch. I attached slightly modified the code to > >better match other WOL capable drivers in tree. Because data sheet > >is not availabl

Re: Problems with 8.1, PPPoE server, and Cisco client

2010-11-09 Thread Paul Thornton
On 26/10/2010 18:55, Paul Thornton wrote: > I've been taking another look at this after being dragged off onto other > things for a few days, and hopefully have some more information that > might help point in the right direction for a fix / where to debug next. > > On 20/10/2010 17:16, Julian El

Re: Problems with 8.1, PPPoE server, and Cisco client

2010-11-09 Thread Paul Thornton
Hi folks, Keeping the list archives updated for any poor soul that has a similar problem in future... On 26/10/2010 18:55, Paul Thornton wrote: > I'm also going to give mpd a go and see if that works - but if it tries > the same config options as pppoed then I may be straight back to where I > am

Re: Problems with 8.1, PPPoE server, and Cisco client

2010-11-09 Thread Paul Thornton
On 09/11/2010 20:16, Paul Thornton wrote: > Sorry for that unedited copy of the last mail to the list. Finger trouble in mail client. Must try harder! Paul. ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ne

Re: Problems with 8.1, PPPoE server, and Cisco client

2010-11-09 Thread Julian Elischer
On 11/9/10 12:18 PM, Paul Thornton wrote: Hi folks, Keeping the list archives updated for any poor soul that has a similar problem in future... On 26/10/2010 18:55, Paul Thornton wrote: I'm also going to give mpd a go and see if that works - but if it tries the same config options as pppoed th

Re: [patch] WOL support for nfe(4)

2010-11-09 Thread Yamagi Burmeister
On Tue, 9 Nov 2010, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: No, the link stays at 1000Mbps so the driver must manually switch back to 10/100Mbps. Hmm, this is real problem for WOL. Establishing 1000Mbps link to accept WOL frames is really bad idea since it can draw more power than 375mA. Consuming more power t

Re: [patch] WOL support for nfe(4)

2010-11-09 Thread Pyun YongHyeon
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 10:01:36PM +0100, Yamagi Burmeister wrote: > On Tue, 9 Nov 2010, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > > >>No, the link stays at 1000Mbps so the driver must manually switch back > >>to 10/100Mbps. > >> > > > >Hmm, this is real problem for WOL. Establishing 1000Mbps link to > >accept WOL

Re: [patch] WOL support for nfe(4)

2010-11-09 Thread Ian Smith
On Tue, 9 Nov 2010, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 10:01:36PM +0100, Yamagi Burmeister wrote: > > On Tue, 9 Nov 2010, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: [..] > > >You can switch to suspend mode with "acpiconf -s1". If all goes > > >well, driver would put the controller into suspend mode aft