Old Synopsis: em(4) failes to send UDP to port 0x
New Synopsis: [em] em(4) fails to send UDP to port 0x
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Dec 20 08:43:36 UTC 2010
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Over to maintainer
Note: to view an individual PR, use:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number).
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including
experimental development code and obsolete releases.
S Tracker
Synopsis: [wpi] Failure to attach wpi(4)
State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: bschmidt
State-Changed-When: Mon Dec 20 11:17:13 UTC 2010
State-Changed-Why:
Can you retry this with a recent 8.2-BETA or stable/8? There have been
quite a few changes regarding PCI-bridge resources.
Synopsis: [wpi] driver fails to attach on a fujitsu-siemens s7110
State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: bschmidt
State-Changed-When: Mon Dec 20 11:23:23 UTC 2010
State-Changed-Why:
Can you retry this with a recent 7.4-BETA, 8.2-BETA or stable/8? There have
been quite a few chan
Hi,
Not sure if this is useful information for you but here goes:
I have exactly the same problem on my Acer Aspire laptop with the same
network card but then under Solaris 10 and Opensolaris, both 64 bit.
The only way for me to get rid of this error and get the card working
is to reduce my memor
On Sun, 2010-12-19 at 00:35 +0600, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I've loaded router using two lagg interfaces in LACP mode.
> lagg0 has IP address and two ports (em0 and em1) and carry untagged frames.
> lagg1 has no IP address and has two ports (igb0 and igb1) and carry
> about 1000 dot-q vlan
On Monday 20 December 2010 12:06:24 Patrick Ale wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Not sure if this is useful information for you but here goes:
> I have exactly the same problem on my Acer Aspire laptop with the same
> network card but then under Solaris 10 and Opensolaris, both 64 bit.
>
> The only way for me to
On 20.12.2010 17:21, Shtorm wrote:
> I had this problem with igb driver, and I found, that lagg selects
> outgoing interface based on packet header flowid field if M_FLOWID field
> is set. And in the igb driver code flowid is set as
>
> #if __FreeBSD_version >= 80
> <--><--><-->r
Synopsis: [wpi] panic: blockable sleep lock with wpi(4)
State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: bschmidt
State-Changed-When: Mon Dec 20 13:33:04 UTC 2010
State-Changed-Why:
Is that still an issue on a recent stable/7 setup? I'm, not able to reproduce
this.
Responsible-Changed-Fr
Synopsis: [wpi] Intel 3945ABG low throughput
State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: bschmidt
State-Changed-When: Mon Dec 20 13:35:50 UTC 2010
State-Changed-Why:
Is that still an issue on a recent stable/7 setup?
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-net->bschmidt
Responsible-Cha
The following reply was made to PR kern/144987; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Bernhard Schmidt
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org,
gabrielquad...@hotmail.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/144987: [wpi] [panic] injecting packets with wlaninject using
Intel 3945ABG wireless card gives kernel panic
Date:
On Monday, December 20, 2010 1:10:57 am John Hay wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I see that on FreeBSD-8 if you use IPv6 inside vlans, the local part of
> the address (bottom 64 bits) is based on the MAC address of the first
> ethernet interface on the system. It was not like this in my old -7,
> machine, so I l
Old Synopsis: em interface use 100% cpu
New Synopsis: [em] em interface use 100% cpu
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Dec 20 15:20:39 UTC 2010
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Over to maintainer(s).
http://www.freebsd.or
John Baldwin wrote
in <201012200807.57670@freebsd.org>:
jh> On Monday, December 20, 2010 1:10:57 am John Hay wrote:
jh> > Hi,
jh> >
jh> > I see that on FreeBSD-8 if you use IPv6 inside vlans, the local part of
jh> > the address (bottom 64 bits) is based on the MAC address of the first
jh> >
Hi!
I observe some kind of undetected bottle-neck with input traffic processing
when traffic goes in through both ports of dual-port 82576-based card
grouped to lagg1 (lacp mode). Ports are connected to Cisco 7606 and
there are over 800 vlans created on top of lagg1.
No output errors or buffer ov
Hi Hiroki,
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 12:54:58AM +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote:
> John Baldwin wrote
> in <201012200807.57670@freebsd.org>:
>
> jh> On Monday, December 20, 2010 1:10:57 am John Hay wrote:
> jh> > Hi,
> jh> >
> jh> > I see that on FreeBSD-8 if you use IPv6 inside vlans, the local pa
Hello, Freebsd-net.
I have file server with Core2Duo E4500 CPU and Intel gigabit adapter
(82566DM).
FreeBSD 8-STABLE (8.2-PRERELEASE #1: Fri Dec 3 2010) and
samba35-3.5.6 are installed.
This server could serve about 110MiB/s to one client over CIFS, but
one core of CPU is completely busy in
On 20.12.2010 23:53, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> I have file server with Core2Duo E4500 CPU and Intel gigabit adapter
> (82566DM).
>
> FreeBSD 8-STABLE (8.2-PRERELEASE #1: Fri Dec 3 2010) and
> samba35-3.5.6 are installed.
>
> This server could serve about 110MiB/s to one client over CIFS, but
The following reply was made to PR kern/153308; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Jack Vogel
To: Yusuf Ozbilgin
Cc: freebsd-gnats-sub...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: misc/153308: em interface use 100% cpu
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 12:09:43 -0800
--20cf305644b1d0fc980497dd19d4
Content-Type: text/plai
Hello, Freebsd-net.
You wrote 20 декабря 2010 г., 20:53:27:
> I have file server with Core2Duo E4500 CPU and Intel gigabit adapter
> (82566DM).
> FreeBSD 8-STABLE (8.2-PRERELEASE #1: Fri Dec 3 2010) and
> samba35-3.5.6 are installed.
> This server could serve about 110MiB/s to one client ove
Hello, Eugene.
You wrote 20 декабря 2010 г., 22:42:41:
>> Is it normal, that 2.2GHz core is needed to saturate 1Gib link with
>> only one client (and one TCP connction), or I have something
>> misconfigured?
> Compare with ftpd that uses sendfile() kernel function.
simple "iperf" shows almo
On 21.12.2010 02:44, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Eugene.
> You wrote 20 декабря 2010 г., 22:42:41:
>
>>> Is it normal, that 2.2GHz core is needed to saturate 1Gib link with
>>> only one client (and one TCP connction), or I have something
>>> misconfigured?
>> Compare with ftpd that uses sen
On 20.12.2010 17:21, Shtorm wrote:
> I had this problem with igb driver, and I found, that lagg selects
> outgoing interface based on packet header flowid field if M_FLOWID field
> is set. And in the igb driver code flowid is set as
>
> #if __FreeBSD_version >= 80
> <--><--><-->r
On 21.12.2010 13:32, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>> I had this problem with igb driver, and I found, that lagg selects
>> outgoing interface based on packet header flowid field if M_FLOWID field
>> is set. And in the igb driver code flowid is set as
>>
>> #if __FreeBSD_version >= 80
>> <--><--
24 matches
Mail list logo
