Re: Lagg questions

2011-01-10 Thread Thomas Steen Rasmussen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09-01-2011 20:42, Francisco Reyes wrote: > Found a couple of good lagg tutorials > http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/freebsd-network-link-aggregation-trunking/ > http://wisekuma.net/linux-bsd/freebsd-lagg/ > > But there are a few things that I can't fi

Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org

2011-01-10 Thread FreeBSD bugmaster
Note: to view an individual PR, use: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker

Re: vlan changes to support ipoib

2011-01-10 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On Sun, 9 Jan 2011, Jeff Roberson wrote: On Sun, 9 Jan 2011, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: On Sat, 8 Jan 2011, Jeff Roberson wrote: Hi Folks, I have made some changes to vlans and I was wondering if anyone would care to review or test. Especially current vlan users. The diff is here: http://pe

Re: Lagg questions

2011-01-10 Thread Francisco Reyes
Thomas Steen Rasmussen writes: Using lagg to bundle two uplinks to two different providers will not work as you intend. You need to look into using pf or something similar to balance layer 3 traffic across two uplinks. I have had this running at home for years with pf, and it works great. Is t

Re: Lagg questions

2011-01-10 Thread Thomas Steen Rasmussen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10-01-2011 14:21, Francisco Reyes wrote: > Thomas Steen Rasmussen writes: > >> Using lagg to bundle two uplinks to two different providers will >> not work as you intend. You need to look into using pf or >> something similar to balance layer 3 tr

PPP and Route Delete

2011-01-10 Thread Melissa Jenkins
I've been working on migrating a PPTP server from FreeBSD 7.1 to FreeBSD 8.1. The server is configured using PopTop (from ports) and PPP (/usr/sbin) rather than MPD. (Before anybody tells me to use MPD we can't because it doesn't inject packets into the kernel in the same way and it's not pos

Re: PPP and Route Delete

2011-01-10 Thread Mike Tancsa
> > I've been working on migrating a PPTP server from FreeBSD 7.1 to FreeBSD 8.1. > The server is configured using PopTop (from ports) and PPP (/usr/sbin) > rather than MPD. (Before anybody tells me to use MPD we can't because it > doesn't inject packets into the kernel in the same way and it

Re: PPP and Route Delete

2011-01-10 Thread Melissa Jenkins
>> I've been working on migrating a PPTP server from FreeBSD 7.1 to FreeBSD >> 8.1. The server is configured using PopTop (from ports) and PPP (/usr/sbin) >> rather than MPD. (Before anybody tells me to use MPD we can't because it >> doesn't inject packets into the kernel in the same way and i

Re: PPP and Route Delete

2011-01-10 Thread Mike Tancsa
On 1/10/2011 1:16 PM, Melissa Jenkins wrote: >>> I've been working on migrating a PPTP server from FreeBSD 7.1 to FreeBSD >>> 8.1. The server is configured using PopTop (from ports) and PPP >>> (/usr/sbin) rather than MPD. (Before anybody tells me to use MPD we can't >>> because it doesn't inj

Re: vlan changes to support ipoib

2011-01-10 Thread John Baldwin
On Saturday, January 08, 2011 11:45:37 pm Jeff Roberson wrote: > Hi Folks, > > I have made some changes to vlans and I was wondering if anyone would care > to review or test. Especially current vlan users. The diff is here: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~jeff/vlan.diff The devat hook I'm glad

RE: Supermicro Bladeserver

2011-01-10 Thread Vogel, Jack
We attempted to repro this problem with the 82566DM (ich8 btw) in house and failed, it worked correctly for my testers. Oh, and just so the mailing lists have an update, the SM Blade problem was not an issue in the driver, it was a local change in the loader.conf that caused the problem. Regar

Re: [arp] possible DoS, fixes and improvements

2011-01-10 Thread George Neville-Neil
On Dec 7, 2010, at 14:19 , rozhuk...@gmail.com wrote: > Hi! > > Hi, Sorry it has taken me a while to test this. In the first two cases I cannot reproduce your results on HEAD. I have attempted to test this with a modified arpwhohas.py script using PCS (ports/net/pcs). I can send very larg

Re: tx v2 error 0x6204 - is this a new feature?

2011-01-10 Thread Pyun YongHyeon
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 11:10 PM, wrote: > Greetings, >  I have been receiving these messages on a recent 8.1/AMD64 install. > src/ports && world/kern about a week ago. Here is a block from the most > recent output: > nfe0: tx v2 error 0x6204 > nfe0: tx v2 error 0x6204 > nfe0: tx v2 error 0x6204

tx v2 error 0x6204 - is this a new feature?

2011-01-10 Thread fbsdmail
Greetings, I have been receiving these messages on a recent 8.1/AMD64 install. src/ports && world/kern about a week ago. Here is a block from the most recent output: nfe0: tx v2 error 0x6204 nfe0: tx v2 error 0x6204 nfe0: tx v2 error 0x6204 nfe0: tx v2 error 0x6204 nfe0: tx v2 error 0x6204 nfe0: t