Re: kern/54383: [nfs] [patch] NFS root configurations without dynamic protocols: dhcp, bootp, etc...

Synopsis: [nfs] [patch] NFS root configurations without dynamic protocols: dhcp, bootp, etc... State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: dougb State-Changed-When: Thu Jul 7 07:06:58 UTC 2011 State-Changed-Why: 1. Old, unsupported FreeBSD version 2. Likely OBE Responsible-Changed-

Re: conf/128334: [request] use wpa_cli in the "WPA DHCP" situation

Synopsis: [request] use wpa_cli in the "WPA DHCP" situation State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: dougb State-Changed-When: Thu Jul 7 07:31:57 UTC 2011 State-Changed-Why: Originator reports this is fixed Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-net->dougb Responsible-Changed-By: do

size-dependent packet loss (Re: bce packet loss)

Kevin Oberman wrote: > ... Years ago, when coaxial Ethernet the norm ... Aha! Another old-timer who has been around long enough to remember 10Mb Ethernet! Maybe something in the following will ring a bell? I have a (to me) very strange problem, for which I have a usable workaround but no actu

Re: soreceive_stream: issues with O_NONBLOCK

signal EOF. It can be simplified by immediately setting the error and going out. The other cases can't ever be true. Please try this patch: http://people.freebsd.org/~andre/soreceive_stream.diff-20110707 I can't fully test it myself due to being 1000km from my development machine and h

Re: kern/154831: [arp] [patch] arp sysctl setting log_arp_permanent_modify has no effect

Synopsis: [arp] [patch] arp sysctl setting log_arp_permanent_modify has no effect State-Changed-From-To: open->patched State-Changed-By: ae State-Changed-When: Thu Jul 7 12:00:18 UTC 2011 State-Changed-Why: Committed to head/. Thanks! http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=154831 __

Debugging dropped shell connections over a VPN

Hello, I am having problems with dropped shell connections over a VPN and I need help diagnosing the problem. My setup is something like this: - My local network is a mix of AIX, HP-UX, Linux, FreeBSD and Solaris machines running various OS versions. - My gateway / firewall machine is runn

Re: kern/154831: commit references a PR

The following reply was made to PR kern/154831; it has been noted by GNATS. From: dfil...@freebsd.org (dfilter service) To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: kern/154831: commit references a PR Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 12:00:34 + (UTC) Author: ae Date: Thu Jul 7 11:59:51 2011 New

Re: bin/137841: [patch] wpa_supplicant(8) cannot verify SHA256 signed certificates

Synopsis: [patch] wpa_supplicant(8) cannot verify SHA256 signed certificates State-Changed-From-To: open->patched State-Changed-By: ae State-Changed-When: Thu Jul 7 12:31:23 UTC 2011 State-Changed-Why: This issue was fixed in head/ with r214734. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=137841

Re: bce packet loss

Broadcom bce nics are trash. I see the same packet loss on linux as weel. The best solution is add/replace with another brand. ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail t

Re: bce packet loss

On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 02:00:26AM -0400, Charles Sprickman wrote: > More inline, including a bigger picture of what I'm seeing on some other > hosts, but I wanted to thank everyone for all the fascinating ethernet BER > info and the final explanation of what the "IfHCInBadOctets" counter > repr

Re: bce packet loss

On Jul 6, 2011, at 5:50 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote: [ ... ] > Any modern Ethernet should be running full-duplex. Sure. With a price point of ~$10 per port for unmanaged gigabit switches nowadays, this is cheap enough that it's widely deployed even for SOHO and small offices. Also, I don't believe

RE: bce packet loss

> > Any thoughts on that? It's the only thing that differs between the > two > > switches. > > > > This makes me think possibility of duplex mismatch between bce(4) > and link partner. You should not use forced media configuration on > 1000baseT link. If you used manual media configuration on bce

Re: soreceive_stream: issues with O_NONBLOCK

On Thu, 07 Jul 2011 12:47:15 +0200 Andre Oppermann wrote: AO> Please try this patch: AO> http://people.freebsd.org/~andre/soreceive_stream.diff-20110707 It works for me. No issues detected so far. Thanks. -- Mikolaj Golub ___ freeb

Re: Debugging dropped shell connections over a VPN

On Jul 7, 2011, at 4:45 AM, Paul Keusemann wrote: > My setup is something like this: > - My local network is a mix of AIX, HP-UX, Linux, FreeBSD and Solaris > machines running various OS versions. > - My gateway / firewall machine is running FreeBSD-8.1-RELEASE-p1 with ipfw, > nat and racoon for

Re: kern/156978: commit references a PR

The following reply was made to PR kern/156978; it has been noted by GNATS. From: dfil...@freebsd.org (dfilter service) To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: kern/156978: commit references a PR Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 20:02:22 + (UTC) Author: thompsa Date: Thu Jul 7 20:02:09 2011

Re: kern/158686: [patch] [tap] Add VIMAGE support to if_tap

Synopsis: [patch] [tap] Add VIMAGE support to if_tap Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-net->freebsd-virtualization Responsible-Changed-By: bz Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Jul 7 22:08:42 UTC 2011 Responsible-Changed-Why: Re-assign http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=158686

Re: bce packet loss

On Thu, 7 Jul 2011, YongHyeon PYUN wrote: On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 02:00:26AM -0400, Charles Sprickman wrote: More inline, including a bigger picture of what I'm seeing on some other hosts, but I wanted to thank everyone for all the fascinating ethernet BER info and the final explanation of what