RE: 10Gb/s ixgbe and mbuf performance tuning.

2012-05-14 Thread Kirk Davis
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Jack Vogel [mailto:jfvo...@gmail.com] wrote: >Do you have LRO enabled? Also, you say it stops routing, do you mean it >passes non-routing traffic, or does everything stop? I do have LRO enabled on both of the interfaces. It stops accepting traffic. It doesn't

Re: 10Gb/s ixgbe and mbuf performance tuning.

2012-05-14 Thread Jack Vogel
Do you have LRO enabled? Also, you say it stops routing, do you mean it passes non-routing traffic, or does everything stop? Jack On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Kirk Davis wrote: > Hi, > >I am running FreeBSD 8.1p3 amd64 with 6Gb of RAM. This > is a router using Quagga for BG

10Gb/s ixgbe and mbuf performance tuning.

2012-05-14 Thread Kirk Davis
Hi, I am running FreeBSD 8.1p3 amd64 with 6Gb of RAM. This is a router using Quagga for BGP. It has two 10Gb/s network connections using the intel ixgbe 2.4.4 driver. It is handling routing for about 200 remote sites and about 300k simultaneous sessions through the box. After a f

Re: B.a.t.m.a.n.

2012-05-14 Thread Monthadar Al Jaberi
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Ivo Vachkov wrote: > Hello all, > > On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Monthadar Al Jaberi > wrote: >> >> On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Ivan Voras wrote: >> > On 13 May 2012 06:46, Ivo Vachkov wrote: >> >> Please define "working"? Porting? Kernel-level implemen

Re: Can't ping my IP

2012-05-14 Thread Jason Hellenthal
Beyond saying... adjust your router/firewall/gateway anything would just be a guess here. Most of the v6 tunnel providers have little details about this and expect you to understand your own technology. On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 02:27:54PM +0300, ahoball alutis wrote: > Hello, > > I going to conn

Re: B.a.t.m.a.n.

2012-05-14 Thread Ivo Vachkov
Hello all, On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Monthadar Al Jaberi wrote: > On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Ivan Voras wrote: > > On 13 May 2012 06:46, Ivo Vachkov wrote: > >> Please define "working"? Porting? Kernel-level implementation? > BSD-licensed > >> one? > > > > I'm just throwing the ide

Can't ping my IP

2012-05-14 Thread ahoball alutis
Hello, I going to connect to my IPv6 FreeBSD server using tunnel. To do that I need to check if my IP pingable. I used http://just-ping.com ping test and it cant pimg my IP. Thanks for help! ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.

Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org

2012-05-14 Thread FreeBSD bugmaster
Note: to view an individual PR, use: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker

Re: B.a.t.m.a.n.

2012-05-14 Thread Monthadar Al Jaberi
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Ivan Voras wrote: > On 13 May 2012 06:46, Ivo Vachkov wrote: >> Please define "working"? Porting? Kernel-level implementation? BSD-licensed >> one? > > I'm just throwing the idea out, in case it catches the eye of someone > who's looking for an interesting project

Re: Regarding SCTP performance

2012-05-14 Thread vansi wow
Hi Michael, Thanks for your inputs . Will provide the pcap tracefile offlist . Regards, Vamshi On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Michael Tuexen < michael.tue...@lurchi.franken.de> wrote: > On May 14, 2012, at 11:39 AM, vansi wow wrote: > > > Hi Michael, > >

Re: Regarding SCTP performance

2012-05-14 Thread Michael Tuexen
On May 14, 2012, at 11:39 AM, vansi wow wrote: > Hi Michael, > Since we use NetBSD 3.0 on the router, the SCTP stack > code is ported to NetBSD 3.0 with some tweaks for the mips platform. > There are no packet loss , since for testing ,we hosted both client and > server o

Re: Regarding SCTP performance

2012-05-14 Thread vansi wow
Hi Michael, Since we use NetBSD 3.0 on the router, the SCTP stack code is ported to NetBSD 3.0 with some tweaks for the mips platform. There are no packet loss , since for testing ,we hosted both client and server on the same router . The CPU Load is very minimal since its j

Re: Regarding SCTP performance

2012-05-14 Thread Michael Tuexen
On May 14, 2012, at 12:21 AM, vansi wow wrote: > Hi All, > we have ported SCTP from FreeBSD 7.0 tree , but we face the Hi Vamshi, I would recommend to use more recent sources... There has been a huge number of bug fixes been committed. BTW: What exactly does "porting" mean? What system