Synopsis: [patch] [ip6] lltable leak when adding and removing IPv6 addresses
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Oct 24 22:32:26 UTC 2012
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Over to maintainer(s).
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/qu
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 11:11 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
...
> In this case, if using if_start() helps, then I'd like Garrett to try
> my current ixgbe patch from the other thread as well to reduce concurrent
> RX processing.
Sounds good. I'll let you guys know when I have everything setup aga
On Wednesday, October 24, 2012 11:38:01 am Jack Vogel wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 8:07 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> > On Tuesday, October 23, 2012 6:57:01 pm Garrett Cooper wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Doing some poking around at the ixgb driver with a card I have at
> > > $work using netperf
On 24.10.2012 16:26, Vadim Goncharov wrote:
Hi,
We have 'maxusers' tunable which affects many other tunables, e.g. number of
network mbuf/clusters which is often too low on current machines.
The mbuf/cluster limit can be rethought as well. Since it all comes
out of UMA and is not pre-allocate
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 8:07 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Tuesday, October 23, 2012 6:57:01 pm Garrett Cooper wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Doing some poking around at the ixgb driver with a card I have at
> > $work using netperf and two machines hooked up over crossover, I
> > discovered that while ixg
On Tuesday, October 23, 2012 6:57:01 pm Garrett Cooper wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Doing some poking around at the ixgb driver with a card I have at
> $work using netperf and two machines hooked up over crossover, I
> discovered that while ixgb's throughput performance was fantastic on
> 7.3/7.4, thoughput p
The following reply was made to PR kern/172113; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Andrew Filonov
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, egrosb...@rdtc.ru
Cc: j...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: kern/172113: [panic] [e1000] [patch] 9.1-RC1/amd64 panices in
igb(4): m_getjcl: invalid cluster type
Date: Wed, 24 Oc
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 10:37:56AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> ... don't suppose you want to throw this into a test case somewhere in the
> tree?
>
This was the bug-followup to my PR [1], that was created because I needed
own version of inet_network() for another my PR [2] and found out that
th
