What breed of a dog can text you?

2013-01-17 Thread PingBrother Networking
http://www.pingbrother.com";> is watching your devices - MONITORING - CONTROL - WATCHDOG What breed of a dog can text you? �a PingBrother watchdog. Easy! Check out our video demo to see how smart our watch

Re: Proposal for changes to network device drivers and network stack (RFC)

2013-01-17 Thread Steve Kiernan
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 00:07:06 +0100 Damien Fleuriot wrote: > > On 17 Jan 2013, at 22:53, Steve Kiernan wrote: > > > On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 22:11:27 +0100 > > Andre Oppermann wrote: > > > >> On 17.01.2013 20:23, Stephen J. Kiernan wrote: > >>> The network stack as a module patch has been separate

Re: Freebsd 8.3-RELEASE kernel panics when Xorp-1.8.6 tries to shutdown

2013-01-17 Thread Daniel Spisak
Is anyone that is familiar with the FreeBSD multicast networking code able to speak up here regarding these kernel panics? Thanks. Daniel Spisak Wednesday, January 16, 2013 8:54 PM Hi there, I'm new to the list! Myself and a colleague have been trying to use Xorp 1.8

Re: Proposal for changes to network device drivers and network stack (RFC)

2013-01-17 Thread Damien Fleuriot
On 17 Jan 2013, at 22:53, Steve Kiernan wrote: > On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 22:11:27 +0100 > Andre Oppermann wrote: > >> On 17.01.2013 20:23, Stephen J. Kiernan wrote: >>> The network stack as a module patch has been separated out and can be found >>> in the following location: >>> http://people.fre

Re: Proposal for changes to network device drivers and network stack (RFC)

2013-01-17 Thread Steve Kiernan
On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 22:11:27 +0100 Andre Oppermann wrote: > On 17.01.2013 20:23, Stephen J. Kiernan wrote: > > The network stack as a module patch has been separated out and can be found > > in the following location: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~marcel/Juniper/netstack-v2.diff > > This is qu

Re: Proposal for changes to network device drivers and network stack (RFC)

2013-01-17 Thread Andre Oppermann
On 17.01.2013 20:23, Stephen J. Kiernan wrote: The network stack as a module patch has been separated out and can be found in the following location: http://people.freebsd.org/~marcel/Juniper/netstack-v2.diff This is quite some work and a lot of changes which will a moment to review. Can you

Re: [JNPR] Proposal for changes to network device drivers and network stack (RFC)

2013-01-17 Thread Stephen J. Kiernan
On Jan 17, 2013 14:23, Stephen J. Kiernan wrote: The network stack as a module patch has been separated out and can be found in the following location: http://people.freebsd.org/~marcel/Juniper/netstack-v2.diff Details about these changes: I also forgot to mention in the previous e-mail. The

Re: Proposal for changes to network device drivers and network stack (RFC)

2013-01-17 Thread Stephen J. Kiernan
The network stack as a module patch has been separated out and can be found in the following location: http://people.freebsd.org/~marcel/Juniper/netstack-v2.diff Details about these changes: 1. Network stack module support infrastructure kern/{kern_netstack.c,netstack_if.m,netstack.h}

Re: two problems in dev/e1000/if_lem.c::lem_handle_rxtx()

2013-01-17 Thread Adrian Chadd
On 17 January 2013 09:44, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > (in the "lem" driver this cannot happen until you release some > rx slots, which only happens once at the end of the lem_rxeof() routine, > not long before re-enabling interrupts) Right. >> * .. and the hardware immediately sends you the MSI or sig

Re: two problems in dev/e1000/if_lem.c::lem_handle_rxtx()

2013-01-17 Thread Luigi Rizzo
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 08:48:25AM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: > There's also the subtle race condition in TX and RX handling that > re-queuing the taskqueue gets around. > > Which is: > > * The hardware is constantly receiving frames , right until you blow > the FIFO away by filling it up; > * Th

Re: two problems in dev/e1000/if_lem.c::lem_handle_rxtx()

2013-01-17 Thread Adrian Chadd
There's also the subtle race condition in TX and RX handling that re-queuing the taskqueue gets around. Which is: * The hardware is constantly receiving frames , right until you blow the FIFO away by filling it up; * The RX thread receives a bunch of frames; * .. and processes them; * .. once it'

Re: two problems in dev/e1000/if_lem.c::lem_handle_rxtx()

2013-01-17 Thread Luigi Rizzo
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 08:08:52AM -0800, Barney Cordoba wrote: > > > --- On Wed, 1/16/13, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > > From: Luigi Rizzo > > Subject: Re: two problems in dev/e1000/if_lem.c::lem_handle_rxtx() > > To: "Barney Cordoba" > > Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org > > Date: Wednesday, January 16

Re: two problems in dev/e1000/if_lem.c::lem_handle_rxtx()

2013-01-17 Thread Barney Cordoba
--- On Wed, 1/16/13, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > From: Luigi Rizzo > Subject: Re: two problems in dev/e1000/if_lem.c::lem_handle_rxtx() > To: "Barney Cordoba" > Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org > Date: Wednesday, January 16, 2013, 9:55 PM > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 06:19:01AM > -0800, Barney Cordoba wrote