On 19.03.2013 05:29, Garrett Wollman wrote:
<
said:
I've attached a patch that has assorted changes.
So I've done some preliminary testing on a slightly modified form of
this patch, and it appears to have no major issues. However, I'm
still waiting for my user with 500 VMs to have enough fr
Hi.
On 19.03.2013 12:56, Yoann Gini wrote:
Even if it’s not built-in the L2TP / PPTP standard, the rest of the world do
it, and need it by the way. Using the VPN gateway as a default one is not
acceptable when it’s made to secure access to specific resources only (i.e:
Split Tunneling), as a
I am looking for suggestions on how to troubleshoot a recurring issue we
have seen on a pair of firewalls. Twice in the past month, we have rebooted
the pair in response to reports of lost connections (an effective, albeit
unhelpful solution). In both cases, we have observed that most connections
s
Garrett Wollman wrote:
> < said:
>
> > I've attached a patch that has assorted changes.
>
> So I've done some preliminary testing on a slightly modified form of
> this patch, and it appears to have no major issues. However, I'm
> still waiting for my user with 500 VMs to have enough free to be a
I wrote:
> Garrett Wollman wrote:
> > < > said:
> >
> > > I've attached a patch that has assorted changes.
> >
> > So I've done some preliminary testing on a slightly modified form of
> > this patch, and it appears to have no major issues. However, I'm
> > still waiting for my user with 500 VMs to
Hi.
On 19.03.2013 20:27, Thomas Johnson wrote:
Does anyone have any suggestions on what I should look for, when this
happens again? Could this be related to reported CARP issues in 9.1, as
discussed on this list recently?
So, in other words, you upgraded from pf 4.4 to pf 4.5 and problems
arise
Hi.
On 19.03.2013 12:03, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
I have no idea how this change can freeze your box. It would be
even better to know whether the issue was triggered by bge(4)
changes. I think you can use bge(4)/brgphy(4) of 8.3-RELEASE on
your stable/8. Copy required files from 8.3-RELEASE to stab
The following reply was made to PR kern/165305; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Mark Andrews
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org,
ma...@isc.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/165305: [ip6] [request] Feature parity between IP_TOS and
IPV6_TCLASS
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 10:05:41 +1100
As a further followup
The following reply was made to PR kern/165305; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Mark Andrews
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org,
ma...@isc.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/165305: [ip6] [request] Feature parity between IP_TOS and
IPV6_TCLASS
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 10:01:49 +1100
Thanks for adding this
Prompt please what or how to implement NAT64 on Freebsd?
--
Vladislav V. Prodan
System & Network Administrator
http://support.od.ua
+380 67 4584408, +380 99 4060508
VVP88-RIPE
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lis
On Wednesday March 20 2013 01:54:03 Vladislav Prodan wrote:
> Prompt please what or how to implement NAT64 on Freebsd?
It is very unfortunate that the PF firewall on FreeBSD
is stuck at an old version and doesn't support NAT64,
nor does the IPFW support it AFICT.
The quickest options that I see i
> On Wednesday March 20 2013 01:54:03 Vladislav Prodan wrote:
> > Prompt please what or how to implement NAT64 on Freebsd?
>
> The quickest options that I see is to fire up a VirtualBox
> under FreeBSD and install a guest OS there that can do the job,
> like OpenBSD 5.2, or perhaps using an old
12 matches
Mail list logo
