On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 09:52:38PM +0200, Andreas Longwitz wrote:
> Yonghyeon PYUN wrote:
>
> >> Maybe there is a bug in vr(4) that generates the hang, but why is
> >
> > Probably yes and I shall have to narrow down the issue.
>
> One more hint: No hang - but of course no TX support - anymore, w
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 1:16 PM, trafdev wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Could someone help with following problem of SO_REUSEPORT.
The most portable "load balance" between processes listening on the
same TCP addr/port probably is:
s=socket();
bind(s);
listen(s);
/* various socketopt and fcntl as you needed
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 04:20:30PM +0200, claudiu vasadi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The patch applied without any problems and the "Size mismatch" messages
> are gone now. However, we cannot get an IP via "dhclient" and we also
> don't have any network connectivity if we set a manual IP. The only
> messages
Yonghyeon PYUN wrote:
>> Maybe there is a bug in vr(4) that generates the hang, but why is
>
> Probably yes and I shall have to narrow down the issue.
One more hint: No hang - but of course no TX support - anymore, when I use
--- if_vr.c.orig2013-06-25 09:58:29.0 +0200
+++ if_vr
On 14.07.2013 23:14, Barney Cordoba wrote:
> So why not get a real 10gb/s card? RJ45 10gig is here,
> and it works a lot better than LAGG.
>
> If you want to get more than 1Gb/s on a single connection,
> you'd need to use roundrobin, which will alternate packets
> without concern for ordering. Pu
So why not get a real 10gb/s card? RJ45 10gig is here,
and it works a lot better than LAGG.
If you want to get more than 1Gb/s on a single connection,
you'd need to use roundrobin, which will alternate packets
without concern for ordering. Purists will argue against it,
but it does work and moder
Synopsis: [netinet] [patch] Multicast SO_REUSEADDR handled incorrectly
State-Changed-From-To: open->patched
State-Changed-By: trociny
State-Changed-When: Sun Jul 14 15:18:10 UTC 2013
State-Changed-Why:
The fix is committed.
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-net->trociny
Responsible-Changed-B
Hi,
The patch applied without any problems and the "Size mismatch" messages
are gone now. However, we cannot get an IP via "dhclient" and we also
don't have any network connectivity if we set a manual IP. The only
messages we see now (with the manual IP) is "no buffer space available".
I checked t
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 10:30:40PM +0200, Andreas Longwitz wrote:
> Yonghyeon PYUN wrote:
>
> >>> Try attached patch and let me know how it works.
> >> Thanks for your patch. I will test it on next update of my soekris boxes
> >> with sis interfaces. Because they are all remote far away this will
