On Jun 17, 2014, at 6:07 PM, Borja Marcos wrote:
Hello,
This should be fixed before the release of 9.3, and of course as soon as
possible for the rest of the branches.
At least under 10-STABLE the oce driver can cause a panic when there's a
lot of network traffic. I have been able
On Jun 18, 2014, at 9:35 AM, Borja Marcos wrote:
In my case, the problem manifests itself running 10. Emulex provides a more
recent driver which compiles perfectly and works perfectly (if we can safely
assume that a weekend saturating a couple of interfaces runnning benchmarks
with no
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183391
--- Comment #12 from bor...@sarenet.es ---
I've compiled the latest driver supplied by Emulex.
Jun 18 17:47:22 pruebas kernel: oce0: Emulex CNA NIC
function:///10.0.747.0/// mem
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183391
--- Comment #13 from bor...@sarenet.es ---
I downloaded the source code from here.
http://www.emulex.com/downloads/emulex/drivers/freebsd/freebsd-91-amd64/drivers/
To summarize:
Compiles cleanly and works on 10-STABLE
Can be compiled
On Jun 18, 2014, at 2:20 PM, Borja Marcos wrote:
Just a follow-up.
I ran the tests on 9.3-BETA3. It doesn't panic, but the interface freezes and
it's unable to transmit packets. So, it's still unusable.
Now I'm installing the new driver and trying again. Will take time, I have
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183391
--- Comment #15 from Kubilay Kocak ko...@freebsd.org ---
Updating Version to 9.3-BETA3 to reflect latest reproduction test.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
Hi,
I was trying to create the netmap code with Centos6.5.x86_64 system but the
make command fails with the following error message:
error: ‘struct ethtool_ops’ has no member named ‘set_channels’
The 2.6.32-431.17.1.el6.x86_64' kernel is being used.
Any help would be greatly
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183391
Kubilay Kocak ko...@freebsd.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|9.2-RELEASE |9.3-BETA3
---
Greetings,
I manage a /29 at $home. While I manage _real_ IPv6 on many networks
at $work. I'm stuck with 6rd at $home. I don't much care for 6rd. It's
still pretty much 6to4. But it's all I have to work with, given the
CPE's limitations. So, as I'm new to it, I'm not quite sure _which_
address to
On 6/18/2014 9:36 AM, Chris H wrote:
Greetings,
I manage a /29 at $home. While I manage _real_ IPv6 on many networks
at $work. I'm stuck with 6rd at $home. I don't much care for 6rd. It's
still pretty much 6to4. But it's all I have to work with, given the
CPE's limitations. So, as I'm new to
Chris,
On 6/18/2014 8:11 PM, Mail Delivery System wrote:
bsd-li...@bsdforge.com: host mx99.ultimatedns.net[209.180.214.225]
said: 550 5.0.0 SPAM and BULK mail REJECTED (in reply to MAIL FROM
command)
You might need to adjust your mail filters. :)
On 6/18/2014 9:36 AM, Chris H wrote:
On 6/18/2014 9:36 AM, Chris H wrote:
Greetings,
I manage a /29 at $home. While I manage _real_ IPv6 on many networks
at $work. I'm stuck with 6rd at $home. I don't much care for 6rd. It's
still pretty much 6to4. But it's all I have to work with, given the
CPE's limitations. So, as I'm new
Chris,
On 6/18/2014 8:11 PM, Mail Delivery System wrote:
bsd-li...@bsdforge.com: host mx99.ultimatedns.net[209.180.214.225]
said: 550 5.0.0 SPAM and BULK mail REJECTED (in reply to MAIL FROM
command)
You might need to adjust your mail filters. :)
Thanks for the heads up. Appears the IP
13 matches
Mail list logo
