https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183391
--- Comment #17 from bor...@sarenet.es ---
Created attachment 144718
-- https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=144718action=edit
10-STABLE patch for the oce driver by Stefano Garzarella
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183391
--- Comment #18 from bor...@sarenet.es ---
Luigi Rizzo and Stefano Garzarella pointed out several bugs. Notably, no
locking operations in critical sections.
Stefano Garzarella sent a test patch against -STABLE. With the patch I haven't
Return values in sendto() manpage says:
[ENOBUFS] The system was unable to allocate an internal buffer.
The operation may succeed when buffers become avail-
able.
[ENOBUFS] The output queue for a network interface was
Hello,
Today I ran into a little problem with ifconfig and rc scripts.
I have tried googling this issue, although all I could find, are people
pointing at syntax errors.
Perhaps someone here has ran into this before and could provide some
pointers.
Here is the relevant /etc/rc.conf settings;
On 16.07.2014 11:22, Jean Paul Galea wrote:
ifconfig_lagg0=laggproto failover laggport igb0 laggport igb1
94.247.171.197/32 netmask 255.255.255.240 broadcast 94.247.171.207
#ifconfig_lagg0_alias0=inet 94.247.171.195 netmask 255.255.255.255
Double mask definition?
You are trying to define
Hello!
I am having trouble using {g,s}etsockopt(SO_RCVTIMEO). Consider the following
small test program.
I expect to retrieve the value of 1 second via getsockopt call, I expect the
following output:
tv_sec=1, tv_usec=0
But I actually get
tv_sec=0, tv_usec=0
What am I missing?
Thanks!
PS:
On 07/16/2014 12:52 PM, Maciej Milewski wrote:
Double mask definition?
You are trying to define 94.247.171.197 with mask 32 and then with mask 28.
Remove the /32 from this line and use simple 94.247.171.197 netmask
255.255.255.240 broadcast 94.247.171.207
Alias is defined correctly.
The
On Wed, 16 Jul 2014, Dmitry Sivachenko wrote:
I am having trouble using {g,s}etsockopt(SO_RCVTIMEO). Consider the following
small test program.
I expect to retrieve the value of 1 second via getsockopt call, I expect the
following output:
tv_sec=1, tv_usec=0
But I actually get
tv_sec=0,
Hi all,
I'm gonna setup a Dell 1955 to use as router. Dual xeon dual core,
with these network cards:
# pciconf -lv | grep -B2 network
vendor = 'Broadcom Corporation'
device = 'NetXtreme II BCM5708S Gigabit Ethernet'
class = network
--
vendor = 'Intel Corporation'
--- Original message ---
From: Cristiano Deana cristiano.de...@gmail.com
Date: 16 July 2014, 18:32:44
Hi all,
I'm gonna setup a Dell 1955 to use as router. Dual xeon dual core,
with these network cards:
# pciconf -lv | grep -B2 network
vendor = 'Broadcom Corporation'
device =
I hope this it the right place to ask questions about netmap. I'm
toying with the idea of writing a netmap-based OSPF implementation
because bird's OSPF implementation isn't as good as its BGP
implementation, quagga doesn't scale well and openospfd doesn't compile
on 10-RELEASE or CURRENT.
But
Hi!
So the UDP transmit path is udp_usrreqs-pru_send() == udp_send() -
udp_output() - ip_output()
udp_output() does do a M_PREPEND() which can return ENOBUFS. ip_output
can also return ENOBUFS.
it doesn't look like the socket code (eg sosend_dgram()) is doing any
buffering - it's just copying
I'm about to bump into this - would you be able to put together a
patch to address these issues? That way I can also test it out with
the UDP stuff I'm working on and get it into the tree.
Thanks,
-a
On 16 July 2014 06:24, Bruce Evans b...@optusnet.com.au wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jul 2014, Dmitry
Hi,
Yes. You can write some matching code to match on what you care about
and reinject the rest back to the netmap host interface that you can
create. There's a way to grab both say, em0 for netmap and the host
side of em0 so you can reinject packets back up to the host stack and
get them from
-Original Message-
From: adrian.ch...@gmail.com [mailto:adrian.ch...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
Adrian Chadd
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 5:50 PM
To: Pieper, Jeffrey E
Cc: Ryan Stone; FreeBSD Net; freebsd-a...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ixgbe and igb - how many queues?
On 15 July 2014
On 16.07.2014 19:48, Daniel Corbe wrote:
I hope this it the right place to ask questions about netmap. I'm
toying with the idea of writing a netmap-based OSPF implementation
because bird's OSPF implementation isn't as good as its BGP
implementation, quagga doesn't scale well and openospfd
On 05/27/14 17:32, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 1:49 AM, Navdeep Parhar wrote:
I'd like to change the netmap global lock from a mutex into a sleepable
shared/exclusive lock. This will allow a driver's nm_register hook
(which is called with the global lock
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187835
Vladislav V. Prodan ad...@support.od.ua changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unspecified
Just a quick note for anyone else that might be trying out the patch...
and I've built the whole system on both nodes without WITNESS and other debug-
ging functionalities:
===
Index: /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC
19 matches
Mail list logo
