Re: Should I be using ipv6_activate_all_interfaces or ip6addrctl_policy=ipv6_prefer

2014-08-27 Thread Jonathan Price
On 2014-08-27 01:40, Peter Wemm wrote: On Tuesday 26 August 2014 10:40:27 free...@jonathanprice.org wrote: Hello, I am configuring a server with IPv4 and IPv6 addresses and have noticed that FreeBSD seems to be preferring IPv4, such as when establishing SSH connections. After reading through

Re: Should I be using ipv6_activate_all_interfaces or ip6addrctl_policy=ipv6_prefer

2014-08-27 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 11:31 PM, Jonathan Price free...@jonathanprice.org wrote: On 2014-08-27 01:40, Peter Wemm wrote: On Tuesday 26 August 2014 10:40:27 free...@jonathanprice.org wrote: Hello, I am configuring a server with IPv4 and IPv6 addresses and have noticed that FreeBSD seems

Re: Patches for RFC6937 and draft-ietf-tcpm-newcwv-00

2014-08-27 Thread Eggert, Lars
It would be great if people could also review Aris' PRR patch - RFC6937 has been out for a while. Lars prr.patch Description: Binary data On 2014-8-26, at 20:09, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote: Hi! I'm going to merge Tom's work in a week unless someone gives me a really good

Re: Patches for RFC6937 and draft-ietf-tcpm-newcwv-00

2014-08-27 Thread Adrian Chadd
Is there a PR for it? -a On 27 August 2014 00:23, Eggert, Lars l...@netapp.com wrote: It would be great if people could also review Aris' PRR patch - RFC6937 has been out for a while. Lars On 2014-8-26, at 20:09, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote: Hi! I'm going to merge Tom's

Re: Patches for RFC6937 and draft-ietf-tcpm-newcwv-00

2014-08-27 Thread Eggert, Lars
Not as far as I know. Lars On 2014-8-27, at 9:39, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote: Is there a PR for it? -a On 27 August 2014 00:23, Eggert, Lars l...@netapp.com wrote: It would be great if people could also review Aris' PRR patch - RFC6937 has been out for a while. Lars

Re: Patches for RFC6937 and draft-ietf-tcpm-newcwv-00

2014-08-27 Thread Adrian Chadd
Ok. Is it the same patch you sent out in Feb? -a On 27 August 2014 00:43, Eggert, Lars l...@netapp.com wrote: Not as far as I know. Lars On 2014-8-27, at 9:39, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote: Is there a PR for it? -a On 27 August 2014 00:23, Eggert, Lars l...@netapp.com

Re: Patches for RFC6937 and draft-ietf-tcpm-newcwv-00

2014-08-27 Thread Eggert, Lars
Yep On 2014-8-27, at 9:53, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote: Ok. Is it the same patch you sent out in Feb? -a On 27 August 2014 00:43, Eggert, Lars l...@netapp.com wrote: Not as far as I know. Lars On 2014-8-27, at 9:39, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote: Is there a

Re: Should I be using ipv6_activate_all_interfaces or ip6addrctl_policy=ipv6_prefer

2014-08-27 Thread freebsd
While doubting Peter's networking answers is usually foolish, I think this one is at least a bit misleading. As he says, ipv6_activate_all_interfaces=YES will set all interfaces on the system to -ifdisable which, since it is an IPv6 option, will enable IPv6 on all interfaces. NO will disable

Re: Should I be using ipv6_activate_all_interfaces or ip6addrctl_policy=ipv6_prefer

2014-08-27 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On 27 Aug 2014, at 06:31 , Jonathan Price free...@jonathanprice.org wrote: On 2014-08-27 01:40, Peter Wemm wrote: On Tuesday 26 August 2014 10:40:27 free...@jonathanprice.org wrote: Hello, I am configuring a server with IPv4 and IPv6 addresses and have noticed that FreeBSD seems to be

Re: Should I be using ipv6_activate_all_interfaces or ip6addrctl_policy=ipv6_prefer

2014-08-27 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 1:20 AM, free...@jonathanprice.org wrote: While doubting Peter's networking answers is usually foolish, I think this one is at least a bit misleading. As he says, ipv6_activate_all_interfaces=YES will set all interfaces on the system to -ifdisable which, since it

Re: Should I be using ipv6_activate_all_interfaces or ip6addrctl_policy=ipv6_prefer

2014-08-27 Thread Jonathan Price
I was over-simplifying and, as you state, any interface explicitly configured for IPv6 will have IPv6 disabled. Those with explicit IPv6 configuration will not be disabled. Most end-user systems are NOT configured with an address. In most cases SLAAC (and, perhaps DHCPv6) along with things like

Re: Should I be using ipv6_activate_all_interfaces or ip6addrctl_policy=ipv6_prefer

2014-08-27 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On 27 Aug 2014, at 18:55 , Jonathan Price free...@jonathanprice.org wrote: Would that mean that a line such as 'ifconfig_IF=DHCP' would not count the interface as being explicitly configured? I haven’t looked into SLAAC or DHCPv6 configuration yet, so I'm not sure if either of those require

how join the mail list?

2014-08-27 Thread David
hi, I want to add netmap support for my net driver, but I don't understand very well the steps on PORTING file. I'd like to join the mail list and check if someone could help me or if someone has gone for the same path. How do I join? -- David Díaz Barquero Ingeniería en Computadores

Re: how join the mail list?

2014-08-27 Thread Jason Hellenthal
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net -- Jason Hellenthal Mobile: +1 (616) 953-0176 jhellent...@dataix.net JJH48-ARIN On Aug 27, 2014, at 16:46, David dajos...@gmail.com wrote: hi, I want to add netmap support for my net driver, but I don't understand very well the

help porting netmap to new driver

2014-08-27 Thread David
Hi, I'm needing to use netmap on a custom driver, I don't understand the content of the functions I need to implement and that are detailed on PORTING file. can someone give a hand to understand it better? regards -- David Díaz Barquero Ingeniería en Computadores Tecnológico de Costa Rica

Re: help porting netmap to new driver

2014-08-27 Thread Luigi Rizzo
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 3:18 PM, David dajos...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'm needing to use netmap on a custom driver, I don't understand the content of the functions I need to implement and that are detailed on PORTING file. ​sometimes (often, actually) the hw has bottlenecks that make native

[Bug 191975] [ng_iface] [regression] in 10.0: cannot contact local services

2014-08-27 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191975 --- Comment #6 from dgilb...@eicat.ca --- I'd like to quickly respond before things veer away. The problem exists when pf is not even loaded or enabled. I brought in some pf examples to try to discern which parts of the stack see the

[Bug 191975] [ng_iface] [regression] in 10.0: cannot contact local services

2014-08-27 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191975 --- Comment #7 from dgilb...@eicat.ca --- I can also add that I have an application that uses if_tun interfaces and they don't exhibit the ng_iface problems. Nor do the gif interfaces exhibit the problem when the packet has not arrived on