On 17/09/14 08:48, Sean Bruno wrote:
On Mon, 2014-09-08 at 11:32 +1000, Nigel Williams wrote:
Hi,
We recently released a new tech report "Design Overview of Multipath TCP
version 0.4 for FreeBSD-11" [1]. The report provides some details on
various aspects of the implementation (session manage
> On Sep 16, 2014, at 6:53 PM, Brett Glass wrote:
>
> At 05:27 PM 9/16/2014, Chris Hill wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 16 Sep 2014, Brett Glass wrote:
>>
>>> So, what is the best solution? I cannot throw out the machine, and
>>> because I am using a VLAN switch to multiplex the port to three LANs
>>> I d
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Mark Felder wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014, at 17:59, Outback Dingo wrote:
> > >
> > Im quite curious why you would want to include something thats been found
> > to be broken and not functional
> > into mainline if it was working sure... im sure we would love
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 3:48 PM, Sean Bruno wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-09-08 at 11:32 +1000, Nigel Williams wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We recently released a new tech report "Design Overview of Multipath TCP
>> version 0.4 for FreeBSD-11" [1]. The report provides some details on
>> various aspects of the impl
At 06:57 PM 9/16/2014, Yonghyeon PYUN wrote:
Then, probably the only available option to establish a link against
the switch would be using reduced speed(100Mbps) with ifconfig(8).
If you can't reduce the speed due to other reasons I'm afraid there
is no way to establish a link at this moment.
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 07:59:18PM -0500, Jim Thompson wrote:
>
> > On Sep 16, 2014, at 6:53 PM, Brett Glass wrote:
> >
> > At 05:27 PM 9/16/2014, Chris Hill wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, 16 Sep 2014, Brett Glass wrote:
> >>
> >>> So, what is the best solution? I cannot throw out the machine, and
>
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 05:53:51PM -0600, Brett Glass wrote:
> At 05:27 PM 9/16/2014, Chris Hill wrote:
>
> >On Tue, 16 Sep 2014, Brett Glass wrote:
> >
> >>So, what is the best solution? I cannot throw out the machine, and
> >>because I am using a VLAN switch to multiplex the port to three LANs
>
At 05:27 PM 9/16/2014, Chris Hill wrote:
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014, Brett Glass wrote:
So, what is the best solution? I cannot throw out the machine, and
because I am using a VLAN switch to multiplex the port to three LANs
I do not want to reduce the speed to 100 Mbps. Ideas?
The man page mentione
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014, Brett Glass wrote:
So, what is the best solution? I cannot throw out the machine, and
because I am using a VLAN switch to multiplex the port to three LANs
I do not want to reduce the speed to 100 Mbps. Ideas?
The man page mentioned says that if "the link partner enabled th
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014, at 17:59, Outback Dingo wrote:
> >
> Im quite curious why you would want to include something thats been found
> to be broken and not functional
> into mainline if it was working sure... im sure we would love it.
> However its been months rolling along to get
> this patch
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 8:48 AM, Sean Bruno wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-09-08 at 11:32 +1000, Nigel Williams wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We recently released a new tech report "Design Overview of Multipath TCP
> > version 0.4 for FreeBSD-11" [1]. The report provides some details on
> > various aspects of th
On Mon, 2014-09-08 at 11:32 +1000, Nigel Williams wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We recently released a new tech report "Design Overview of Multipath TCP
> version 0.4 for FreeBSD-11" [1]. The report provides some details on
> various aspects of the implementation (session management, data-level
> retransmis
So, what is the best solution? I cannot throw out the machine, and
because I am using a VLAN switch to multiplex the port to three LANs
I do not want to reduce the speed to 100 Mbps. Ideas?
--Brett Glass
At 02:37 AM 9/16/2014, Yonghyeon PYUN wrote:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 08:19:37AM -0600, Bre
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 08:19:37AM -0600, Brett Glass wrote:
> At 12:08 AM 9/15/2014, Yonghyeon PYUN wrote:
>
> >Would you show me the output of dmesg(jme(4) and jmphy(4) only) to
> >know exact chip revision?
>
> Here you are.
>
> jme0: port
> 0xec80-0xecff,0xe800-0xe8ff mem 0xfbffc000-0xfbfff
14 matches
Mail list logo
