On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 10:31:56AM -0700, hiren panchasara wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 1:01 AM, Julien Cigar wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 04:36:49PM -0700, hiren panchasara wrote:
> >> On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Julien Cigar wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 10:24:13AM -0700,
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176167
Andrey V. Elsukov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|In Discussion |Issue Resolved
Hi there,
I was testing the newest netmap on a dual-port x520-T2 adapter using a
6-core machine.
However, I always get error in* nm_txsync_prologue *for n - 1 threads when
I try to use n threads (n > 1), which indicates the cur pointer points to a
wrong place. At last, only one thread works corre
how many queues do you have ?
you need to run with as many threads as there are queues.
If hyperthreading is on you are likely to have 12 virtual cores,
and depending on the OS the driver might limit the number to 8
(this is what happens on FreeBSD).
pkt-gen with a single thread should tell you ho
pkt-gen tells I have 6 queues.
Yue
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> how many queues do you have ?
> you need to run with as many threads as there are queues.
> If hyperthreading is on you are likely to have 12 virtual cores,
> and depending on the OS the driver might limit
Hello list!
I have a need to use FWD in ipfw, but for my needs pf are much way simpler.
I have tested some rules in the past year inside pf, even disabling states,
but things do better with ipfw regarding FWD - do not know way.
I have heard that ipfw and pf could work together, but with a lot of
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194234
Bug ID: 194234
Summary: [ixgbe] Update ixgbe to 2.5.27
Product: Base System
Version: 11.0-CURRENT
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: Needs Triage
Severit
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194234
Eric Joyner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ricer...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 fr
Hi,
jails work now with lagg0 again on my machine. It seems to me that it
was a specific problem of this one machine.
I installed the following revisions:
272555 starting point which failed
272400 failed
272000 works
272200 works
272300 works
272400 test again and it works
