Hi Evandro.
I've tested netmap-ipfw on real NICs.
Use "
./kipfw -i netmap:em0 -i netmap:em1
" to run netmap-ipfw on em0 and em1. ipfw works as a bridge and copy
incoming packets to em0 to em1 if they pass defined rules (and vice versa,
from em1 to em0).
If you still have problem with ipfw-netmap,
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 5:02 AM, Evandro Nunes
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 9:24 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>>
>>> The code on code.google.com/p/netmap-ipfw/ works well for me
>>> on physical interfaces.
>>>
>>> For using the nics many
Xin Li wrote this message on Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 13:41 -0800:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 11/07/14 08:31, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > ... that's .. odd.
> >
> > Let's poke the freebsd crypto and network stack people and ask. I
> > can't imagine why this is a problem a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 11/07/14 08:31, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> ... that's .. odd.
>
> Let's poke the freebsd crypto and network stack people and ask. I
> can't imagine why this is a problem anymore and we should default
> to it being on. The other thing you could do is
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> ... that's .. odd.
>
> Let's poke the freebsd crypto and network stack people and ask. I
> can't imagine why this is a problem anymore and we should default to
> it being on.
I don't think there's a crypto@ list, though security@ might repres
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 5:02 AM, Evandro Nunes
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 9:24 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
>> The code on code.google.com/p/netmap-ipfw/ works well for me
>> on physical interfaces.
>>
>> For using the nics many of your examples show that you are not using the
>> various program
... that's .. odd.
Let's poke the freebsd crypto and network stack people and ask. I
can't imagine why this is a problem anymore and we should default to
it being on. The other thing you could do is have the tor port require
it be turned on before tor runs.
-adrian
On 7 November 2014 00:20, gra
At Fri, 7 Nov 2014 13:33:43 +0100,
Matthias Apitz wrote:
> My question is: What does the %em0 mean in the IPv6 addr and why it is
> not working without it?
[...]
> I consulted the handbook and the RFC:
>
> https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/network-ipv6.html
> http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3513.tx
On 2014-11-05 19:11:55 (+0100), Ilya Bakulin wrote:
> On 2014-11-05 19:00, Mark Felder wrote:
> > Now if we could only stamp out the bug with ipv6 fragment and pf I'd be
> > a happy, happy daemon. :-)
>
> This is somewhat more complex problem, I'll take a look as the time
> allows.
>
I've been
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 9:24 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> The code on code.google.com/p/netmap-ipfw/ works well for me
> on physical interfaces.
>
> For using the nics many of your examples show that you are not using the
> various programs correctly. There is clearly a
> mismatch between what this co
> it does not work with the link-local addr:
>
> $ ./ipv6-client fe80::20c:29ff:fe47:a38d
> host: fe80::20c:29ff:fe47:a38d
> ssh: connect: Network is unreachable
This is expected.
> but with appending %em0 it does work:
>
> $ ./ipv6-client fe80::20c:29ff:fe47:a38d%em0
> host: fe80::20c:29ff
Hi,
I have a small question re/ the IPv6 link-local address; I configured
IPv6 in my 11-CURRENT with:
/etc/rc.conf:
ifconfig_em0_ipv6="inet6 accept_rtadv"
rtsold_enable="YES"
The em0 interface now looks like this:
# ifconfig em0
em0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500
options=9b
eth
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 03:42:28PM +0400, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
>
> I'd like to remove faith (IPv6/v4 translator) from base.
Another data point: http://www.litech.org/ptrtd/
This project was similar to faith; the last release was in 2002 and it
has been officially declared dead in 2
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 8:52 AM, Philipp Winter wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 04:04:41AM -0500, grarpamp wrote:
>> 173 FreeBSD
>
> FreeBSD still seems to use globally incrementing IP IDs by default.
> That's an issue as it leaks fine-grained information about how many
> packets a relay's networ
14 matches
Mail list logo