On 02/05/15 at 11:19P, Sean Bruno wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 02/05/15 11:13, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 5 February 2015 at 11:03, Sean Bruno sbr...@ignoranthack.me
wrote:
Some questions came up around the office and we ended up doing
some quite silly
Hi,
Some network cards support IEE1588 hardware timestamp (like some Intel
card), but their drivers didn't support this feature.
I beleive there is a kernel feature missing for this suppport.
Searching on the archive's mailing-list, I've found this post about some
legal issue:
On 02/05/15 at 11:13P, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 5 February 2015 at 11:03, Sean Bruno sbr...@ignoranthack.me wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Some questions came up around the office and we ended up doing some
quite silly things with lo0 and netcat.
If one runs
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186449
Garrett Cooper,425-314-3911 n...@freebsd.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
I got the bridge device created ( kernel config needed to be changed ).
But don't know how the add works -
Is it because of the lagg ???
018780222f020d# ifconfig bridge0 addm bge0 addm bge1
ifconfig: BRDGADD bge0: Invalid argument
Thanks,
-p
From: Sinha, Prokash Sinha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Some questions came up around the office and we ended up doing some
quite silly things with lo0 and netcat.
If one runs a continuous netcat on localhost to another netcat listener
on localhost that writes the output to /dev/null, netisr gets super
On 5 February 2015 at 11:03, Sean Bruno sbr...@ignoranthack.me wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Some questions came up around the office and we ended up doing some
quite silly things with lo0 and netcat.
If one runs a continuous netcat on localhost to another netcat
On Feb 5, 2015, at 1:13 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 5 February 2015 at 11:03, Sean Bruno sbr...@ignoranthack.me
mailto:sbr...@ignoranthack.me wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Some questions came up around the office and we ended up doing some
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 02/05/15 11:13, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 5 February 2015 at 11:03, Sean Bruno sbr...@ignoranthack.me
wrote:
Some questions came up around the office and we ended up doing
some quite silly things with lo0 and netcat.
If one runs a
rrs added a comment.
Jhb/Others
So lets go through your scenario with code in arp:
a) softclock dequeues callout to run
-- Which calls softclock_call_cc
We make it to line:676 and see that yes the user (arp) init'd with a
rw_mtx
and run the next line 677 (to get the lock).
b) other
rrs added a comment.
Adrian:
I know he said callout_drain, but just like in TCP that is *not* always
possible. In
the case of the arp/nd6 code lock are held (same as TCP) so you can't do a
callout_drain. Thats
why the original author put ref-counting in with the idea that the timer would
kill
gnn accepted this revision.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1691
To: arybchik, gnn
Cc: freebsd-net
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
arybchik added a comment.
Committed to src head
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1691
To: arybchik, gnn
Cc: freebsd-net
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send
arybchik closed this revision.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1691
To: arybchik, gnn
Cc: freebsd-net
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
On Feb 5, 2015, at 12:03 PM, Sean Bruno sbr...@ignoranthack.me wrote:
Signed PGP part
Some questions came up around the office and we ended up doing some
quite silly things with lo0 and netcat.
If one runs a continuous netcat on localhost to another netcat listener
on localhost that
Hi All,
I'm trying to come up with a L2 forwarding from one interface to the other. Is
creating a bridge a good idea ?
The context:
I will have ether_frame coming from client to one NIC port BCM ( the driver is
bge), it will come to an interface, and want to forward to the other interface.
On 5 February 2015 at 11:31, Scott Long via freebsd-net
freebsd-net@freebsd.org wrote:
On Feb 5, 2015, at 12:03 PM, Sean Bruno sbr...@ignoranthack.me wrote:
Signed PGP part
Some questions came up around the office and we ended up doing some
quite silly things with lo0 and netcat.
If one
On 02/05/15 at 12:31P, Scott Long via freebsd-net wrote:
On Feb 5, 2015, at 12:03 PM, Sean Bruno sbr...@ignoranthack.me wrote:
Signed PGP part
Some questions came up around the office and we ended up doing some
quite silly things with lo0 and netcat.
If one runs a continuous
On Feb 5, 2015, at 2:23 PM, hiren panchasara hi...@strugglingcoder.info
wrote:
On 02/05/15 at 12:31P, Scott Long via freebsd-net wrote:
Welcome to our workload. Granted, we don?t involve pf, but the majority of
our CPU processing right now is spent in TCP (with the rest being spent
19 matches
Mail list logo
