Hi,
Has there been an effort to implement the Westwood congestion control
algorithm? Is there a source file available? I would like to take a look
and see how Bandwidth estimation is done there.
Thank you in advance!
Best Regards,
Karlis
___
On 01.01.2015 18:29, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
At any rate what does interface groups that the carp(4) interface is a
member of mean?
FreeBSD has interface groups. Any interface may be a member of one or multiple
groups,
you can manually insert interface into a group, list groups etc. See
John-Mark Gurney wrote this message on Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 11:11 -0700:
I would also be fine w/ documenting this behavior, though I'm sure
it'd be surprising to many that you'd have to check to make sure your
data was properly copied.
Should have reviewed the m_copyback function before
I was reviewing m_copyback from some other code, and noticed that it does
this:
if (m0 == NULL)
return;
at the beginin... If you pass in a NULL mbuf, it will not copy any data
in.. This is clearly to avoid panics, but at the same time, this means
we'll have data loss...
On 4/23/2015 11:26 AM, Matthew Grooms wrote:
On 4/22/2015 8:34 PM, Scott O'Connell wrote:
I tried your suggestions.
I was successful in changing the vmhost01 bridge to include vlan100
and tap0, and in the vm (dev) binding the address directly to vtnet0.
On the VMHOST:
tap0:
Thanks Navdeep, I figured there had to be more going on than just
allowing packets across interfaces. With forwarding automatically disabling
TSO/LRO that would entirely explain why my bandwidth throughput tests drop
off significantly.
*[image: userimage]Scott Larson[image: los angeles]
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194515
Kubilay Kocak ko...@freebsd.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|New |Open
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181741
--- Comment #9 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: ngie
Date: Sat Apr 25 05:32:03 UTC 2015
New revision: 281974
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/281974
Log:
MFC
Hi,
Just saw this. Can somebody re-produce this?
root@m4fh2:~ # sysctl net.inet.ip.forwarding
net.inet.ip.forwarding: 1
root@m4fh2:~ # ifconfig bridge0 create
root@m4fh2:~ # sysctl net.inet.ip.forwarding
net.inet.ip.forwarding: 0
That's on GENERIC 10-STABLE from the day before yesterday.
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 01:47:50AM +0900, Paul S. wrote:
Can confirm that anything to do with netif restart on a forwarding
interface also creates the same problem.
On 4/25/2015 ?? 01:46, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
Hi,
Just saw this. Can somebody re-produce this?
root@m4fh2:~ #
Hi
This happens when any interface is created if you've enabled forwarding
with the sysctl and not using gateway_enable in rc.conf. It is easily
fixed though.
See this thread from January:
https://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=403720+0+archive/2015/freebsd-net/20150104.freebsd-net
Can confirm that anything to do with netif restart on a forwarding
interface also creates the same problem.
On 4/25/2015 午前 01:46, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
Hi,
Just saw this. Can somebody re-produce this?
root@m4fh2:~ # sysctl net.inet.ip.forwarding
net.inet.ip.forwarding: 1
root@m4fh2:~ #
Hi,
--- Original Message ---
From: Nikos Vassiliadis
Date: 24 April 2015, 19:46:42
Hi,
Just saw this. Can somebody re-produce this?
root@m4fh2:~ # sysctl net.inet.ip.forwarding
net.inet.ip.forwarding: 1
root@m4fh2:~ # ifconfig bridge0 create
root@m4fh2:~ # sysctl
On 04/24/15 18:54, Gary Palmer wrote:
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 01:47:50AM +0900, Paul S. wrote:
Can confirm that anything to do with netif restart on a forwarding
interface also creates the same problem.
On 4/25/2015 ?? 01:46, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
Hi,
Just saw this. Can somebody
On 04/24/15 18:57, Paul Thornton wrote:
Hi
This happens when any interface is created if you've enabled forwarding
with the sysctl and not using gateway_enable in rc.conf. It is easily
fixed though.
See this thread from January:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194515
Bartek Rutkowski ro...@freebsd.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
robak added a subscriber: robak.
robak added a comment.
Is there any update on these fixes? I've just happened to bump my 10.1-RELEASE
into 10-STABLE and created few VIMAGE based jails. As soon as I stop any of
them, and I can reproduce it every time, the host OS crashes. That makes the
entire
glebius added a comment.
Recently Nikos has asked questions on kernel debugging. So, I guess, he is
working.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1944
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: nvass-gmx.com, bz, zec, trociny, glebius,
18 matches
Mail list logo
