Daniel Braniss wrote:
On Aug 17, 2015, at 3:21 PM, Rick Macklem rmack...@uoguelph.ca wrote:
Daniel Braniss wrote:
On Aug 17, 2015, at 1:41 PM, Christopher Forgeron csforge...@gmail.com
wrote:
FYI, I can regularly hit 9.3 Gib/s with my Intel X520-DA2's and FreeBSD
10.1.
Daniel Braniss wrote:
On Aug 17, 2015, at 1:41 PM, Christopher Forgeron csforge...@gmail.com
wrote:
FYI, I can regularly hit 9.3 Gib/s with my Intel X520-DA2's and FreeBSD
10.1. Before 10.1 it was less.
this is NOT iperf/3 where i do get close to wire speed,
it’s NFS writes,
On Aug 17, 2015, at 12:41 PM, Slawa Olhovchenkov s...@zxy.spb.ru wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:27:41AM +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote:
hi,
I have a host (Dell R730) with both cards, connected to an HP8200
switch at 10Gb.
when writing to the same storage (netapp) this is what
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:27:41AM +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote:
hi,
I have a host (Dell R730) with both cards, connected to an HP8200
switch at 10Gb.
when writing to the same storage (netapp) this is what I get:
ix0:~130MGB/s
mlxen0
FYI, I can regularly hit 9.3 Gib/s with my Intel X520-DA2's and FreeBSD
10.1. Before 10.1 it was less.
I used to tweak the card settings, but now it's just stock. You may want to
check your settings, the Mellanox may just have better defaults for your
switch.
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 6:41 AM,
Hi,
Does anyone know if FreeBSD 9.3 is compliant with RFC7034?
Thanks,
Gary
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On Aug 17, 2015, at 1:41 PM, Christopher Forgeron csforge...@gmail.com
wrote:
FYI, I can regularly hit 9.3 Gib/s with my Intel X520-DA2's and FreeBSD 10.1.
Before 10.1 it was less.
this is NOT iperf/3 where i do get close to wire speed,
it’s NFS writes, i.e., almost real work :-)
I
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 01:35:06PM +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote:
On Aug 17, 2015, at 12:41 PM, Slawa Olhovchenkov s...@zxy.spb.ru wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:27:41AM +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote:
hi,
I have a host (Dell R730) with both cards, connected to an HP8200
On 17 August 2015 at 13:39, Slawa Olhovchenkov s...@zxy.spb.ru wrote:
In any case, for 10Gb expect about 1200MGB/s.
Your usage of units is confusing. Above you claim you expect 1200
million gigabytes per second, or 1.2 * 10^18 Bytes/s. I don't think
any known network interface can do that,
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 01:49:27PM +0200, Alban Hertroys wrote:
On 17 August 2015 at 13:39, Slawa Olhovchenkov s...@zxy.spb.ru wrote:
In any case, for 10Gb expect about 1200MGB/s.
Your usage of units is confusing. Above you claim you expect 1200
I am use as topic starter and expect
Hi, Alexander,
I'm seeing the following backtrace with kernel trap 12 at fault address
of 0xf4, and the backtrace is:
arpintr() at arpintr+0x85e
netisr_dispatch_src() at netisr_dispatch_src+0x61
I have then read the if_ether.c as of r286525.
In line 611, la is initialized as NULL;
In line
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:27:41AM +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote:
hi,
I have a host (Dell R730) with both cards, connected to an HP8200
switch at 10Gb.
when writing to the same storage (netapp) this is what I get:
ix0:~130MGB/s
mlxen0
On Aug 17, 2015, at 3:21 PM, Rick Macklem rmack...@uoguelph.ca wrote:
Daniel Braniss wrote:
On Aug 17, 2015, at 1:41 PM, Christopher Forgeron csforge...@gmail.com
wrote:
FYI, I can regularly hit 9.3 Gib/s with my Intel X520-DA2's and FreeBSD
10.1. Before 10.1 it was less.
this is
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 05:44:37PM +0200, Alban Hertroys wrote:
On 17 August 2015 at 13:54, Slawa Olhovchenkov s...@zxy.spb.ru wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 01:49:27PM +0200, Alban Hertroys wrote:
On 17 August 2015 at 13:39, Slawa Olhovchenkov s...@zxy.spb.ru wrote:
In any case, for
I think we are getting a better performance today with the IXGBE_FDIR
switched off. It's not 100% decisive though, since we've only pushed it to
little bit below 200kpps. We'll push more traffic tomorrow and see how it
goes.
-Maxim
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Maxim Sobolev
On 17 August 2015 at 13:54, Slawa Olhovchenkov s...@zxy.spb.ru wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 01:49:27PM +0200, Alban Hertroys wrote:
On 17 August 2015 at 13:39, Slawa Olhovchenkov s...@zxy.spb.ru wrote:
In any case, for 10Gb expect about 1200MGB/s.
Your usage of units is confusing. Above
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200323
Luiz Otavio O Souza,+55 (14) 99772-1255 l...@freebsd.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Open
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200323
--- Comment #23 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: loos
Date: Mon Aug 17 19:06:15 UTC 2015
New revision: 286859
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/286859
Log:
MFC r286260:
Remove the
hi,
I have a host (Dell R730) with both cards, connected to an HP8200
switch at 10Gb.
when writing to the same storage (netapp) this is what I get:
ix0:~130MGB/s
mlxen0 ~330MGB/s
this is via nfs/tcpv3
I can get similar
Hello,
I have some questions about the sysctl net.key.preferred_oldsa:
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/sys/netipsec/key.c?view=markup#l971
When I set the net.key.preferred_oldsa to 0 (similar to Linux's behavior,
according to what I have read so far):
- why does the kernel delete itself
20 matches
Mail list logo
