[Bug 204438] setsockopt() handling of kern.ipc.maxsockbuf limit

2015-11-11 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204438 --- Comment #12 from Kubilay Kocak --- Looks like I missed the review creation, ignore my last comment, except for the 'needs a committer/assignee' bit ;D -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _

[Bug 54309] TCP Packet of 64K-1 crashes FreeBSD4.8

2015-11-11 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54309 Kubilay Kocak changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||crash, needs-qa Status|

[Bug 204438] setsockopt() handling of kern.ipc.maxsockbuf limit

2015-11-11 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204438 Kubilay Kocak changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-patch |patch --- Comment #11 from Kubilay

[Bug 129719] [nfs] [panic] Panic during shutdown, tcp_ctloutput: inp == NULL

2015-11-11 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=129719 Dan Nelson changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |Overcome By Events Status

[Bug 108670] [tcp] TCP connection ETIMEDOUT

2015-11-11 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108670 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|si...@freebsd.org |freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org --- Comment

[Bug 92690] [tcp] slowstart_flightsize ignored in 6-STABLE

2015-11-11 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92690 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|si...@freebsd.org |freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org

[Bug 82470] FreeBSD advertises wrong window scale in some situations

2015-11-11 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82470 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lini...@freebsd.org Keywor

[Bug 75122] [netinet] [patch] Incorrect inflight bandwidth calculation on first packet

2015-11-11 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=75122 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|si...@freebsd.org |freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Ke

[Bug 76504] Keep-alives doesn't work on half-closed sockets.

2015-11-11 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76504 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lini...@freebsd.org Assign

[Bug 54309] TCP Packet of 64K-1 crashes FreeBSD4.8

2015-11-11 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54309 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|si...@freebsd.org |freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org

[Bug 15095] TCP's advertised window is not scaled immediately upon discovering use of Window scale option

2015-11-11 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15095 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org|freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org -- You are

[Differential] [Updated] D4129: Bug 204438 - setsockopt() handling of kern.ipc.maxsockbuf limit

2015-11-11 Thread cameronsparr_gmail.com (Cameron Sparr)
cameronsparr_gmail.com updated the summary for this revision. REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D4129 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: cameronsparr_gmail.com, Contributor Reviewers, network Cc: freebsd-net-list, imp

[Differential] [Updated, 12 lines] D4129: Bug 204438 - setsockopt() handling of kern.ipc.maxsockbuf limit

2015-11-11 Thread cameronsparr_gmail.com (Cameron Sparr)
cameronsparr_gmail.com removed rS FreeBSD src repository as the repository for this revision. cameronsparr_gmail.com updated this revision to Diff 10121. cameronsparr_gmail.com added a comment. spaces to tabs CHANGES SINCE LAST UPDATE https://reviews.freebsd.org/D4129?vs=10120&id=10121 REV

[Bug 204438] setsockopt() handling of kern.ipc.maxsockbuf limit

2015-11-11 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204438 --- Comment #10 from Cameron Sparr --- Got it, thanks for the link, I put up a review on phabricator. May I suggest you put a link to the wiki (https://wiki.freebsd.org/CodeReview) on the homepage of the phabricator site? Looks like you can

[Differential] [Updated] D4129: Bug 204438 - setsockopt() handling of kern.ipc.maxsockbuf limit

2015-11-11 Thread cameronsparr_gmail.com (Cameron Sparr)
cameronsparr_gmail.com added a reviewer: network. cameronsparr_gmail.com added a subscriber: freebsd-net-list. REPOSITORY rS FreeBSD src repository REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D4129 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: camerons

[Bug 204438] setsockopt() handling of kern.ipc.maxsockbuf limit

2015-11-11 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204438 Cameron Sparr changed: What|Removed |Added URL|https://github.com/sparrc/f |https://reviews.freebsd.org

[Bug 204438] setsockopt() handling of kern.ipc.maxsockbuf limit

2015-11-11 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204438 --- Comment #9 from NGie Cooper --- This wiki page describes how our current code review process works: https://wiki.freebsd.org/CodeReview -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 204438] setsockopt() handling of kern.ipc.maxsockbuf limit

2015-11-11 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204438 --- Comment #8 from Allan Jude --- There is a command line tool for Phabricator called 'arcanist' (devel/php5-arcanist) that simplifies posting patches to PHabriactor. It works with svn and git. Or, via the Phabricator web interface, you c

[Bug 204438] setsockopt() handling of kern.ipc.maxsockbuf limit

2015-11-11 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204438 --- Comment #7 from Cameron Sparr --- @Kubilay I realized that I actually have no idea how to use svn/phabricator, so I'm just going to attach a patch to this case. Let me know how it looks, thank you. -- You are receiving this mail becau

[Bug 204438] setsockopt() handling of kern.ipc.maxsockbuf limit

2015-11-11 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204438 --- Comment #6 from Cameron Sparr --- Created attachment 163023 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=163023&action=edit Patch of the diff in the URL section. Changes behavior of setsockopt This change makes it so that

[Bug 202680] Silent data corruption on em(4) interfaces

2015-11-11 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202680 --- Comment #22 from Yaniv Kunda --- (In reply to Sean Bruno from comment #21) I've set the value to -1 (in loader.conf), rebooted, and verified the new value using sysctl. In contrast to Dmitry, the problem happens for me even right after

Re: Intel XL710 broken link down detection?

2015-11-11 Thread Eric Joyner
I think the early versions of the description of the command were vague, so that's why it got everyone. We caught it and fixed it a few days ago internally. On Wed, Nov 11, 2015, 8:37 AM Jack Vogel wrote: > LOL, Damn, what's the world coming to when you can't trust them Linux guys > :) > > Jack

Re: Intel XL710 broken link down detection?

2015-11-11 Thread Jack Vogel
LOL, Damn, what's the world coming to when you can't trust them Linux guys :) Jack On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 8:31 AM, Ryan Stone wrote: > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Steven Hartland > wrote: > >> Comparing this to the Linux driver which does detect the link down I've >> discovered it ac

Re: Intel XL710 broken link down detection?

2015-11-11 Thread Ryan Stone
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Steven Hartland wrote: > Comparing this to the Linux driver which does detect the link down I've > discovered it actually polls the link status by default in its watchdog. > > Disabling this with "ethtool --set-priv-flags eth1 LinkPolling off" and > the Linux dri

Re: Intel XL710 broken link down detection?

2015-11-11 Thread Steven Hartland
Comparing this to the Linux driver which does detect the link down I've discovered it actually polls the link status by default in its watchdog. Disabling this with "ethtool --set-priv-flags eth1 LinkPolling off" and the Linux driver also fails to detect link down. So this seems like a firmwa

Business proposal - advertising

2015-11-11 Thread Liat - Velis Media
Hi, I want to buy your mobile traffic. I have amazing results with similar companies like you, I believe it will be very profitable working together! We pay fix CPM and guarantee high quality offers. Pls contact me Liat -- [image: VELIS MEDIA] *Liat Tessone**|* *Mobile **Media Manage

[Bug 202680] Silent data corruption on em(4) interfaces

2015-11-11 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202680 --- Comment #21 from Sean Bruno --- Can you folks try setting the processing limits to -1? I'm curious if what you're seeing is a symptom of conflicting processing during interrupt context and deferred handling to the taskqueue threads. c

Intel XL710 broken link down detection?

2015-11-11 Thread Steven Hartland
Seems the Intel XL710 (ixl) has broken link detection, it triggers on link up but not on link down. I'm currently running HEAD (r290610) on the box which has 1.4.3 and have tried the latest driver from downloads.intel.com which is listed as 1.4.8 but reports 1.4.5. We've updated to the lates

[Bug 203630] [Hyper-V] [nat] [tcp] 10.2 NAT bug in TCP stack or hyperv netsvc driver

2015-11-11 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203630 Kubilay Kocak changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch Flags|

[Bug 204437] 10.2 STABLE Crashing with IPSec Support

2015-11-11 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204437 Kubilay Kocak changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||crash, needs-qa Severity

[Bug 204438] setsockopt() handling of kern.ipc.maxsockbuf limit

2015-11-11 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204438 Kubilay Kocak changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||mfc-stable9?, mfc-stable10?