[Bug 204437] 10.2 STABLE Crashing with IPSec Support

2015-11-12 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204437 Steven Hartland changed: What|Removed |Added CC||s...@freebsd.org --- Comment #4

[Bug 204437] 10.2 STABLE Crashing with IPSec Support

2015-11-12 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204437 --- Comment #3 from Cassiano Peixoto --- (In reply to Andrey V. Elsukov from comment #2) Hi Andrey, Thanks for your help. Here is the output commands you asked. Let me know if you need something else. (kgdb) f 7 #7 0x80d2e8c2 in

[Bug 204438] setsockopt() handling of kern.ipc.maxsockbuf limit

2015-11-12 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204438 --- Comment #16 from Cameron Sparr --- I forgot that it's actually spelled out pretty clearly in the comments of the code: /* Don't error on this BSD doesn't and if you think * about it this is right. Otherwise apps have to * play 'guess

[Bug 204438] setsockopt() handling of kern.ipc.maxsockbuf limit

2015-11-12 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204438 --- Comment #15 from Alfred Perlstein --- > Re (1) do you mean that when kern.ipc.maxsockbuf gets set, scale the sb_max > value up by the inverse of sb_max_adj? ie, kern.ipc.maxsockbuf * 2304 / 2048. > In that case, setting kern.ipc.maxso

[Bug 204438] setsockopt() handling of kern.ipc.maxsockbuf limit

2015-11-12 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204438 --- Comment #14 from Cameron Sparr --- @Alfred, thanks for the background info Re (1) do you mean that when kern.ipc.maxsockbuf gets set, scale the sb_max value up by the inverse of sb_max_adj? ie, kern.ipc.maxsockbuf * 2304 / 2048. In tha

[Bug 204437] 10.2 STABLE Crashing with IPSec Support

2015-11-12 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204437 Andrey V. Elsukov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||a...@freebsd.org --- Comment #

[Bug 204438] setsockopt() handling of kern.ipc.maxsockbuf limit

2015-11-12 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204438 Alfred Perlstein changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alf...@freebsd.org --- Comment

[Bug 75122] [netinet] [patch] Incorrect inflight bandwidth calculation on first packet

2015-11-12 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=75122 --- Comment #19 from Kubilay Kocak --- There's at least one "well known" script out there that does, and was used to optimize certain kernel parameters based on average RTT, etc values that came from hostcachelist. It doesn't appear to use t

[Bug 75122] [netinet] [patch] Incorrect inflight bandwidth calculation on first packet

2015-11-12 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=75122 --- Comment #18 from Dan Nelson --- I doubt anyone is trying to parse the output of net.inet.tcp.hostcache.list, so it could be removed. At some point the spare fields in struct tcpcb could be removed, too. There are still a lot of padding

RE: Intel XL710 broken link down detection?

2015-11-12 Thread Pieper, Jeffrey E
We already have a fix in place that will be committed for review shortly. Thanks, Jeff -Original Message- From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Steven Hartland Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2015 1:52 AM To: Ryan Stone Cc: Jack F Vogel ;

[Bug 108670] [tcp] TCP connection ETIMEDOUT

2015-11-12 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108670 Hiren Panchasara changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unspecified |10.1-STABLE --- Comment #8 from

[Bug 75122] [netinet] [patch] Incorrect inflight bandwidth calculation on first packet

2015-11-12 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=75122 --- Comment #17 from Hiren Panchasara --- (In reply to Dan Nelson from comment #15) Grr. totally didn't see this comment before my comment #16. Would have saved some archeology that I had to do to dig out the rev number :-) Anyways. should

[Bug 75122] [netinet] [patch] Incorrect inflight bandwidth calculation on first packet

2015-11-12 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=75122 Hiren Panchasara changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hi...@freebsd.org --- Comment #1

Re: Intel XL710 broken link down detection?

2015-11-12 Thread Steven Hartland
Yes this works but a better way IMO would be to invert the bits we want: https://people.freebsd.org/~smh/ixl_int_init.patch If there are no objections then I'll commit this later today. Also just fixed the debug sysctls from causing panics when compiled with INVARIANTS see: https://svnweb.free

[Bug 92690] [tcp] slowstart_flightsize ignored in 6-STABLE

2015-11-12 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92690 Hiren Panchasara changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hi...@freebsd.org Resolu