https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204437
Steven Hartland changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||s...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #4
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204437
--- Comment #3 from Cassiano Peixoto ---
(In reply to Andrey V. Elsukov from comment #2)
Hi Andrey,
Thanks for your help. Here is the output commands you asked. Let me know if you
need something else.
(kgdb) f 7
#7 0x80d2e8c2 in
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204438
--- Comment #16 from Cameron Sparr ---
I forgot that it's actually spelled out pretty clearly in the comments of the
code:
/* Don't error on this BSD doesn't and if you think
* about it this is right. Otherwise apps have to
* play 'guess
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204438
--- Comment #15 from Alfred Perlstein ---
> Re (1) do you mean that when kern.ipc.maxsockbuf gets set, scale the sb_max
> value up by the inverse of sb_max_adj? ie, kern.ipc.maxsockbuf * 2304 / 2048.
> In that case, setting kern.ipc.maxso
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204438
--- Comment #14 from Cameron Sparr ---
@Alfred, thanks for the background info
Re (1) do you mean that when kern.ipc.maxsockbuf gets set, scale the sb_max
value up by the inverse of sb_max_adj? ie, kern.ipc.maxsockbuf * 2304 / 2048.
In tha
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204437
Andrey V. Elsukov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||a...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204438
Alfred Perlstein changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alf...@freebsd.org
--- Comment
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=75122
--- Comment #19 from Kubilay Kocak ---
There's at least one "well known" script out there that does, and was used to
optimize certain kernel parameters based on average RTT, etc values that came
from hostcachelist. It doesn't appear to use t
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=75122
--- Comment #18 from Dan Nelson ---
I doubt anyone is trying to parse the output of net.inet.tcp.hostcache.list, so
it could be removed. At some point the spare fields in struct tcpcb could be
removed, too. There are still a lot of padding
We already have a fix in place that will be committed for review shortly.
Thanks,
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org] On
Behalf Of Steven Hartland
Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2015 1:52 AM
To: Ryan Stone
Cc: Jack F Vogel ;
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108670
Hiren Panchasara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unspecified |10.1-STABLE
--- Comment #8 from
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=75122
--- Comment #17 from Hiren Panchasara ---
(In reply to Dan Nelson from comment #15)
Grr. totally didn't see this comment before my comment #16. Would have saved
some archeology that I had to do to dig out the rev number :-)
Anyways. should
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=75122
Hiren Panchasara changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hi...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #1
Yes this works but a better way IMO would be to invert the bits we want:
https://people.freebsd.org/~smh/ixl_int_init.patch
If there are no objections then I'll commit this later today.
Also just fixed the debug sysctls from causing panics when compiled with
INVARIANTS see:
https://svnweb.free
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92690
Hiren Panchasara changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hi...@freebsd.org
Resolu
15 matches
Mail list logo