Re: pf state disappearing [ adaptive timeout bug ]

On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Matthew Grooms wrote: > On 1/21/2016 11:04 AM, Nick Rogers wrote: > >> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Matthew Grooms >> wrote: >> >> All, >>> >>> I have a curious problem with a lightly loaded pair of pf firewall >>>

[Bug 206478] Setting laggproto fails on 10.2

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206478 --- Comment #3 from Erin Clark --- (In reply to LN from comment #2) That portion of code appears different in 10.2-STABLE, is this perhaps the part that should be changed in that? if (proto->ti_proto ==

[Bug 196252] [patch] show tcp hostcache usage in netstat -s -p tcp

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196252 Marcelo Araujo changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org

Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls?

be>None of the above. Plain recvmsg() returns ssize_t and its len arg has be>type size_t. That is excessively typedefed and excessively large with be>64-bit ssize_t, but it is silly for the multiple-message variant to use be>smaller types. be> be>Otherwise, all the integer types should be int.

Re: pf state disappearing [ adaptive timeout bug ]

On 1/22/2016 3:35 PM, Nick Rogers wrote: On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Matthew Grooms wrote: # pfctl -si Status: Enabled for 0 days 02:25:41 Debug: Urgent State Table Total Rate current entries77759

Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX

hello, I am testing a chelsio t520-so-cr connected to a Intel card with ix(4) driver, I can get the ncxl0 interface to transmit at 14Mpps to another chelsio or to a Intel card. However I can only get 800Kpps-1Mpps for RX tests from both chelsio or Intel. I have test with both FreeBSD 11 and

[Bug 206478] Setting laggproto fails on 10.2

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206478 LN changed: What|Removed |Added CC|