For what it is worth, I also would use this Feature. to whitelist a set of
MACS
On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 4:14 PM, Aleksandr A Babaylov <"."@babolo.ru> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 01:41:12PM +0300, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
> > 05.06.2016, 11:45, "??zkan KIRIK" :
> > > I also need this feat
On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 01:41:12PM +0300, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
> 05.06.2016, 11:45, "??zkan KIRIK" :
> > I also need this feature
>
> Are you fine with exact-match mac addresses?
Yes, exact-match is fine for me.
> (E.g. new array/hash tabletype with the ability to do exact lookup on the
To view an individual PR, use:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id).
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users,
which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering
all versions including experimental development code and ob
-- Forwarded message --
From: fatal
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2016 18:20:56 +0200
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Sharing experience with Via Nano 1.6ghz with
Padlock hw accel
To: tor-rel...@lists.torproject.org
Hello,
openssl with enabled padlock and tor stable crashes on my via nano
servers r
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181703
Neel Chauhan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |Overcome By Events
Stat
On 05.06.2016 12:41, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
Are you fine with exact-match mac addresses? (E.g. new array/hash
tabletype with the ability to do exact lookup on the
source/destination mac address, w/o any masks support).
Yes, exact-match would totally satisfy my requirements.
Regards,
Ju
05.06.2016, 11:45, "Özkan KIRIK" :
> I also need this feature
Are you fine with exact-match mac addresses?
(E.g. new array/hash tabletype with the ability to do exact lookup on the
source/destination mac address, w/o any masks support).
>
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Aleksandr A Babaylov <".
I also need this feature
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Aleksandr A Babaylov <"."@babolo.ru> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 02:18:56PM +0200, Julian K. wrote:
> > is there anyone who wants to use MAC based rules with IPFW?
> > I want to build a captive portal that also supports IPv6. MAC addre
