Re: IPv6 userland cleanup

On 10/09/2019 03:17, Mihir Luthra wrote: > Also, while replacing gethostby* calls, I came across arp. I learned that > arp command is only for ipv4 while ipv6 uses ndp protocol. I was wondering > if it would be useful to make a ndp command for ipv6 just like arp is for > ipv4? There already is a n

[Bug 240400] ipnat not working some time after a lot of calls to the "map" or "rdr" rules (drop packets)

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240400 Cy Schubert changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|n...@freebsd.org |c...@freebsd.org -- You are receiv

[Bug 240400] ipnat not working some time after a lot of calls to the "map" or "rdr" rules (drop packets)

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240400 Cy Schubert changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|Affects Many People |Affects Only Me -- You are receivin

[Bug 240400] ipnat not working some time after a lot of calls to the "map" or "rdr" rules (drop packets)

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240400 --- Comment #2 from Cy Schubert --- 11.2-RELEASE does not have r338047, the bucket index fix. Update to 11.3-STABLE first, please. Or see PR/208566 for the fix. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___

[Bug 240400] ipnat not working some time after a lot of calls to the "map" or "rdr" rules (drop packets)

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240400 --- Comment #1 from Cy Schubert --- ipnat -lv output, please. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.fre

[Bug 240400] ipnat not working some time after a lot of calls to the "map" or "rdr" rules (drop packets)

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240400 DYM changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|Affects Some People |Affects Many People -- You are receiving th

Re: IPv6 userland cleanup

Hi everyone, I have started working on the project ipv6 userland cleanup [1]. I introduced myself here almost 2 months [2] ago but couln't really start with project before due to time constraints. Now I started with replacing some gethostby* calls with getaddrinfo(3). I have some code with me whic

[Bug 240400] ipnat not working some time after a lot of calls to the "map" or "rdr" rules (drop packets)

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240400 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|n...@freebsd.org -- You are receiv

[Bug 240416] Windows scaling (net.inet.tcp.rfc1323=1) does not start the TCP connection to some systems

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240416 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|n...@freebsd.org -- You are receiv

Re: BBR patches?

Hello Jamie, Thanks - I see there is a new file added tcp_ratelimit.c (probably to emulate tc-fq behavior under Linux?). However, don't see this file under "netinet/"am I missing something? Is there a way to checkout the entire netinet/ code with BBR changes in FreeBSD? I would like to build,

[Bug 240023] netmap lb pointer out of bounds on ixgbe

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240023 --- Comment #6 from mike --- Some differences of note: in IXGBE driver: diff sys/dev/ixgbe/ixgbe_netmap.c 11.2/sys/dev/ixgbe/ixgbe_netmap.c 33c33 < /*$FreeBSD: releng/11.3/sys/dev/ixgbe/ixgbe_netmap.c 344047 2019-02-12 09:26:05Z vmaffione

Re: panic: rcv_start < rcv_end

> On 5. Sep 2019, at 21:40, Piotr Kubaj via freebsd-net > wrote: > > Hello, > > today I had a panic on CURRENT/powerpc64. I guess running make fetch for one > of ports had something to do with it: > db> show panic > panic: rcv_start < rcv_end > db> bt > Tracing pid 0 tid 100176 td 0xc6

Re: BBR patches?

> I would like to try BBR under FreeBSD. > > I'm willing to try anything experimental as well. Could someone please > suggest what is the latest patch available for this. The last patch I came > across is: > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D15525 > > Could someone please confirm if there is anything la

Re: 10 Gbps NIC - advice needed

I second the recommendation for Chelsio. I had brand new retail Intel 40GE NICs (4 x 10GE) and I got so frustrated with the bugs that I sold them used on eBay just to recoup some of the cost. -Dustin On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 6:41 AM Robert Heron wrote: > > Hi, > > I need to use a 10 Gbps, 2 port

BBR patches?

Hello everyone, I would like to try BBR under FreeBSD. I'm willing to try anything experimental as well. Could someone please suggest what is the latest patch available for this. The last patch I came across is: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D15525 Could someone please confirm if there is anything