On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 at 8:53 am, Ben Woods wrote:
> On Thu, 16 May 2019 at 2:25 am, Hiroki Sato wrote:
>
>> wrote
>> in <001e01d50b49$176104d0$46230e70$@gmail.com>:
>>
>> dr> Has anyone ever thought or considered integrating an IPv6 DHCP client
>> in
>> dr> base?
>>
>
> I would like to discuss
On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 12:50:49PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 10/9/19 2:34 AM, Julien Cigar wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 01:05:37PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> >> On 10/8/19 8:58 AM, Julien Cigar wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 10:20:34AM -0500, Matthew Grooms wrote:
> H
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240530
l...@donnerhacke.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #207415|0 |1
is obsolete|
On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 01:41:40PM -0500, Matthew Grooms wrote:
> On 10/9/2019 4:10 AM, Julien Cigar wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 11:22:51AM -0500, Matthew Grooms wrote:
> >> On 10/8/2019 10:58 AM, Julien Cigar wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 10:20:34AM -0500, Matthew Grooms wrote:
> >>>
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241106
--- Comment #3 from lenzi.ser...@gmail.com ---
in the file /usr/src/sys/net/rtsock.c line 1579
for the pointer => rt->rt_ifp->if_addr the system does not panic, but any
route to the ppp tunX (if_tun) results in a router to the remote ip on
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240608
--- Comment #3 from Harald Schmalzbauer ---
(In reply to Eric Joyner from comment #2)
Thanks for the hint, I also thought this could solve/influence the panic, but
won't find time before the weekend. I also found that it only happens when
