https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224116
Eugene Grosbein changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Open|Closed
Resolution|---
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205592
Eugene Grosbein changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |Feedback Timeout
Sta
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247647
--- Comment #9 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: vmaffione
Date: Mon Jul 20 21:08:57 UTC 2020
New revision: 363378
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/363378
Log:
iflib: initialize netmap w
Hi!
> Has anyone compiled a script/test suite for testing various NIC
> features to make sure they work/function properly?
>
> That is, being able to run a couple interfaces back to back, and turn
> off the features off on one, and make sure things like checksum offload
> and the like work proper
Has anyone compiled a script/test suite for testing various NIC
features to make sure they work/function properly?
That is, being able to run a couple interfaces back to back, and turn
off the features off on one, and make sure things like checksum offload
and the like work properly?
--
John-M
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 04:25:27PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 03:38:48PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 03:05:50PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> >
> > > > > Currently this is idle server and totaly interrupts count for firmware
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 03:38:48PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 03:05:50PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
>
> > > > Currently this is idle server and totaly interrupts count for firmware
> > > > command completion is 50x more compared to completion queue
> > > > in
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 03:05:50PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > > Currently this is idle server and totaly interrupts count for firmware
> > > command completion is 50x more compared to completion queue
> > > interrupts. I am afraid to flooded at prodation load.
> > Did you reflashed firmw
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 02:31:48PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 02:04:26PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 01:43:39PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 07:12:07PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > > >
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 02:04:26PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 01:43:39PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 07:12:07PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > > Can anybody explain what purpose of unnamed interrupts of Mellanox
> > > Connec
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 01:43:39PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 07:12:07PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > Can anybody explain what purpose of unnamed interrupts of Mellanox
> > ConnectX-5 cards?
> >
> > I am see 19 interrupts per card. I am mean last 16 is RX
On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 07:12:07PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> Can anybody explain what purpose of unnamed interrupts of Mellanox
> ConnectX-5 cards?
>
> I am see 19 interrupts per card. I am mean last 16 is RX queue.
It is more correct to describe them as completion queue interrupts, they
12 matches
Mail list logo
